768 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29449445)
21. The effect of Q.Clear reconstruction on quantification and spatial resolution of 18F-FDG PET in simultaneous PET/MR.
Tian D; Yang H; Li Y; Cui B; Lu J
EJNMMI Phys; 2022 Jan; 9(1):1. PubMed ID: 35006411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Impact of time of flight and point spread function on quantitative parameters of lung lesions in
Huang K; Feng Y; Liang W; Li L
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Nov; 21(1):169. PubMed ID: 34773998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Quantitative performance and optimal regularization parameter in block sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstructions in clinical
Ter Voert EEGW; Muehlematter UJ; Delso G; Pizzuto DA; Müller J; Nagel HW; Burger IA
EJNMMI Res; 2018 Jul; 8(1):70. PubMed ID: 30054750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Does a novel penalized likelihood reconstruction of 18F-FDG PET-CT improve signal-to-background in colorectal liver metastases?
Parvizi N; Franklin JM; McGowan DR; Teoh EJ; Bradley KM; Gleeson FV
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 84(10):1873-8. PubMed ID: 26163992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Optimizing scan time and bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm in copper-64 PET/CT imaging: a phantom study.
Monsef A; Sheikhzadeh P; Steiner JR; Sadeghi F; Yazdani M; Ghafarian P
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 May; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 38608316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Reconstructed spatial resolution and contrast recovery with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction (Q.Clear) for FDG-PET compared to time-of-flight (TOF) with point spread function (PSF).
Rogasch JM; Suleiman S; Hofheinz F; Bluemel S; Lukas M; Amthauer H; Furth C
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Jan; 7(1):2. PubMed ID: 31925574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation and Optimization of a New PET Reconstruction Algorithm, Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction, for Lung Cancer Assessment According to Lesion Size.
Otani T; Hosono M; Kanagaki M; Onishi Y; Matsubara N; Kawabata K; Kimura H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Aug; 213(2):W50-W56. PubMed ID: 30995096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of a Bayesian Penalized Likelihood PET Reconstruction Compared With Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization on Clinical Image Quality Over a Wide Range of Patient Weights.
Chilcott AK; Bradley KM; McGowan DR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):153-157. PubMed ID: 29091008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Phantom and clinical evaluation of the effect of a new Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm (HYPER Iterative) on
Xu L; Cui C; Li R; Yang R; Liu R; Meng Q; Wang F
EJNMMI Res; 2022 Dec; 12(1):73. PubMed ID: 36504014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Impact of different image reconstructions on PET quantification in non-small cell lung cancer: a comparison of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma.
Messerli M; Kotasidis F; Burger IA; Ferraro DA; Muehlematter UJ; Weyermann C; Kenkel D; von Schulthess GK; Kaufmann PA; Huellner MW
Br J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 92(1096):20180792. PubMed ID: 30673302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical evaluation of reconstruction and acquisition time for pediatric
Shkumat NA; Vali R; Shammas A
Pediatr Radiol; 2020 Jun; 50(7):966-972. PubMed ID: 32125447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Time-of-Flight Information Improved the Detectability of Subcentimeter Spheres Using a Clinical PET/CT Scanner.
Hashimoto N; Morita K; Tsutsui Y; Himuro K; Baba S; Sasaki M
J Nucl Med Technol; 2018 Sep; 46(3):268-273. PubMed ID: 29599404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Optimization of a Bayesian penalized likelihood algorithm (Q.Clear) for
Yoshii T; Miwa K; Yamaguchi M; Shimada K; Wagatsuma K; Yamao T; Kamitaka Y; Hiratsuka S; Kobayashi R; Ichikawa H; Miyaji N; Miyazaki T; Ishii K
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Sep; 7(1):56. PubMed ID: 32915344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Optimization of Image Reconstruction for
Rowley LM; Bradley KM; Boardman P; Hallam A; McGowan DR
J Nucl Med; 2017 Apr; 58(4):658-664. PubMed ID: 27688476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Image enhancement of whole-body oncology [
Mehranian A; Wollenweber SD; Walker MD; Bradley KM; Fielding PA; Su KH; Johnsen R; Kotasidis F; Jansen FP; McGowan DR
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Jan; 49(2):539-549. PubMed ID: 34318350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Influence of Reconstruction FOV and Matrix Size on the Quantitative Accuracy of FDG-PET: Comparison between OSEM and Bayesian Penalized Likelihood].
Mikami S; Nakamura F; Nakamura A; Torizuka T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2021; 77(5):454-462. PubMed ID: 34011788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Brain PET imaging optimization with time of flight and point spread function modelling.
Prieto E; Martí-Climent JM; Morán V; Sancho L; Barbés B; Arbizu J; Richter JA
Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):948-955. PubMed ID: 26249138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm for low-count clinical
Te Riet J; Rijnsdorp S; Roef MJ; Arends AJ
EJNMMI Phys; 2019 Dec; 6(1):32. PubMed ID: 31889228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Image reconstruction methods affect software-aided assessment of pathologies of [
Lindström E; Oddstig J; Danfors T; Jögi J; Hansson O; Lubberink M
Neuroimage Clin; 2020; 28():102386. PubMed ID: 32882645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Optimization of PET/CT image quality using the GE 'Sharp IR' point-spread function reconstruction algorithm.
Vennart NJ; Bird N; Buscombe J; Cheow HK; Nowosinska E; Heard S
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jun; 38(6):471-479. PubMed ID: 28394818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
