These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29450892)

  • 1. Rat choice in rapidly changing concurrent schedules.
    McLean AP; Grace RC; Shevchouk OT; Cording JR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Mar; 109(2):313-335. PubMed ID: 29450892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats.
    Newland MC; Reile PA; Langston JL
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004; 26(2):179-94. PubMed ID: 15019952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapid acquisition of preference in concurrent schedules: effects of reinforcement amount.
    Maguire DR; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 17416469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rapid acquisition of bias in signal detection: dynamics of effective reinforcement allocation.
    Hutsell BA; Jacobs EA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Jan; 97(1):29-49. PubMed ID: 22287803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference.
    Davison M; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jul; 80(1):95-129. PubMed ID: 13677611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Steady-state choice between four alternatives obeys the constant-ratio rule.
    Bensemann J; Lobb B; Podlesnik CA; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jul; 104(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 25989016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration.
    McLean AP; Blampied NM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jan; 75(1):25-42. PubMed ID: 11256865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Concurrent-schedule performance in transition: changeover delays and signaled reinforcer ratios.
    Krägeloh CU; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jan; 79(1):87-109. PubMed ID: 12696743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamical concurrent schedules.
    Palya WL; Allan RW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jan; 79(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 12696738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensitivity, changeover responses, and choice in transition.
    Jiménez AA; Aparicio CF
    Behav Processes; 2009 Sep; 82(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19615608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The matching law and effects of reinforcer rate and magnitude on choice in transition.
    Kyonka EG
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 18243576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fix and sample with rats in the dynamics of choice.
    Aparicio CF; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jul; 86(1):43-63. PubMed ID: 16903492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The general matching law describes choice on concurrent variable-interval schedules of wheel-running reinforcement.
    Belke TW; Belliveau J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 May; 75(3):299-310. PubMed ID: 11453620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Choice, changing over, and reinforcement delays.
    Shahan TA; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Nov; 74(3):311-30. PubMed ID: 11218228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Choosing among multiple alternatives: Relative and overall reinforcer rates.
    Beeby E; Alsop B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):204-222. PubMed ID: 28758210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Choice dynamics in concurrent ratio schedules of reinforcement.
    Bellow D; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2023 Mar; 119(2):337-355. PubMed ID: 36718124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Zebrafish choice behavior is sensitive to reinforcer rate, immediacy, and magnitude ratios.
    Kuroda T; Ritchey CM; Podlesnik CA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2021 Sep; 116(2):182-207. PubMed ID: 34223635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inter-response-time reinforcement and relative reinforcer frequency control choice.
    Tanno T; Silberberg A
    Learn Behav; 2015 Mar; 43(1):54-71. PubMed ID: 25515591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensitivity to pre- and post-reinforcer delays in self-control choice.
    Yamaguchi T; Saeki D; Ito M
    Behav Processes; 2015 Dec; 121():8-12. PubMed ID: 26456039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contingency discriminability and the generalized matching law describe choice on concurrent ratio schedules of wheel-running reinforcement.
    Belke TW
    Behav Processes; 2012 Jul; 90(3):291-301. PubMed ID: 22414348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.