These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29451315)
1. Sensitivity to the Sampling Process Emerges From the Principle of Efficiency. Jara-Ettinger J; Sun F; Schulz L; Tenenbaum JB Cogn Sci; 2018 May; 42 Suppl 1():270-286. PubMed ID: 29451315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. People learn other people's preferences through inverse decision-making. Jern A; Lucas CG; Kemp C Cognition; 2017 Nov; 168():46-64. PubMed ID: 28662485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Naïve Utility Calculus as a unified, quantitative framework for action understanding. Jara-Ettinger J; Schulz LE; Tenenbaum JB Cogn Psychol; 2020 Dec; 123():101334. PubMed ID: 32738590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Children's understanding of the costs and rewards underlying rational action. Jara-Ettinger J; Gweon H; Tenenbaum JB; Schulz LE Cognition; 2015 Jul; 140():14-23. PubMed ID: 25867996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Young children's use of statistical sampling evidence to infer the subjectivity of preferences. Ma L; Xu F Cognition; 2011 Sep; 120(3):403-11. PubMed ID: 21353215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inferences about moral character moderate the impact of consequences on blame and praise. Siegel JZ; Crockett MJ; Dolan RJ Cognition; 2017 Oct; 167():201-211. PubMed ID: 28527671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A decision network account of reasoning about other people's choices. Jern A; Kemp C Cognition; 2015 Sep; 142():12-38. PubMed ID: 26010559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Young children infer preferences from a single action, but not if it is constrained. Pesowski ML; Denison S; Friedman O Cognition; 2016 Oct; 155():168-175. PubMed ID: 27416301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mentalizing under influence: abnormal dependence on prior expectations in patients with schizophrenia. Chambon V; Pacherie E; Barbalat G; Jacquet P; Franck N; Farrer C Brain; 2011 Dec; 134(Pt 12):3728-41. PubMed ID: 22108577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The child as econometrician: a rational model of preference understanding in children. Lucas CG; Griffiths TL; Xu F; Fawcett C; Gopnik A; Kushnir T; Markson L; Hu J PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e92160. PubMed ID: 24667309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Learning the Structure of Social Influence. Gershman SJ; Pouncy HT; Gweon H Cogn Sci; 2017 Apr; 41 Suppl 3():545-575. PubMed ID: 28294384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Age-related similarities and differences in monitoring spatial cognition. Ariel R; Moffat SD Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2018 May; 25(3):351-377. PubMed ID: 28361562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multiple neural signatures of social proof and deviance during the observation of other people's preferences. Schnuerch R; Richter J; Koppehele-Gossel J; Gibbons H Psychophysiology; 2016 Jun; 53(6):823-36. PubMed ID: 26928085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rational Inference of Beliefs and Desires From Emotional Expressions. Wu Y; Baker CL; Tenenbaum JB; Schulz LE Cogn Sci; 2018 Apr; 42(3):850-884. PubMed ID: 28986938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inferring mass in complex scenes by mental simulation. Hamrick JB; Battaglia PW; Griffiths TL; Tenenbaum JB Cognition; 2016 Dec; 157():61-76. PubMed ID: 27592412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Post choice information integration as a causal determinant of confidence: Novel data and a computational account. Moran R; Teodorescu AR; Usher M Cogn Psychol; 2015 May; 78():99-147. PubMed ID: 25868113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inferring word meanings by assuming that speakers are informative. Frank MC; Goodman ND Cogn Psychol; 2014 Dec; 75():80-96. PubMed ID: 25238461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]