These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29451529)

  • 1. Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviews.
    Byrne JA
    Res Integr Peer Rev; 2016; 1():12. PubMed ID: 29451529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: methodological approaches to evaluate the literature and establish best evidence.
    Skelly AC; Hashimoto RE; Norvell DC; Dettori JR; Fischer DJ; Wilson JR; Tetreault LA; Fehlings MG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S9-18. PubMed ID: 24026148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical reviewers improve reporting in biomedical articles: a randomized trial.
    Cobo E; Selva-O'Callagham A; Ribera JM; Cardellach F; Dominguez R; Vilardell M
    PLoS One; 2007 Mar; 2(3):e332. PubMed ID: 17389922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A systematic review of peer review for scientific manuscripts.
    Larson BP; Chung KC
    Hand (N Y); 2012 Mar; 7(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 23449238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.
    Enquselassie F
    Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide.
    Kelly J; Sadeghieh T; Adeli K
    EJIFCC; 2014 Oct; 25(3):227-43. PubMed ID: 27683470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Practical Tips of English Expressions for Non-Native English-Speaking Peer Reviewers.
    Lee M
    Vasc Specialist Int; 2021 Jul; 37():23. PubMed ID: 34282058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A prospective study on an innovative online forum for peer reviewing of surgical science.
    Almquist M; von Allmen RS; Carradice D; Oosterling SJ; McFarlane K; Wijnhoven B
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0179031. PubMed ID: 28662046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer reviewer training and editor support: results from an international survey of nursing peer reviewers.
    Freda MC; Kearney MH; Baggs JG; Broome ME; Dougherty M
    J Prof Nurs; 2009; 25(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 19306833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relationship of previous training and experience of journal peer reviewers to subsequent review quality.
    Callaham ML; Tercier J
    PLoS Med; 2007 Jan; 4(1):e40. PubMed ID: 17411314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A retrospective analysis of submissions, acceptance rate, open peer review operations, and prepublication bias of the multidisciplinary open access journal Head & Face Medicine.
    Stamm T; Meyer U; Wiesmann HP; Kleinheinz J; Cehreli M; Cehreli ZC
    Head Face Med; 2007 Jun; 3():27. PubMed ID: 17562003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic review of content and quality of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis review articles.
    Milne KM; Chan C; Fisher JH; de Boer K; Ryerson CJ
    ERJ Open Res; 2018 Oct; 4(4):. PubMed ID: 30588478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact Factors and Prediction of Popular Topics in a Journal.
    Nielsen MB; Seitz K
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Aug; 37(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 27490462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the benefits of systematic reviews for wildlife parasitology.
    Haddaway NR; Watson MJ
    Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl; 2016 Aug; 5(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 27617203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A survey of prevalence of narrative and systematic reviews in five major medical journals.
    Faggion CM; Bakas NP; Wasiak J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):176. PubMed ID: 29281975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does anybody read "evidence-based" articles?
    Loke YK; Derry S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2003 Jul; 3():14. PubMed ID: 12892569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perspectives on involvement in the peer-review process: surveys of patient and public reviewers at two journals.
    Schroter S; Price A; Flemyng E; Demaine A; Elliot J; Harmston RR; Richards T; Staniszewska S; Stephens R
    BMJ Open; 2018 Sep; 8(9):e023357. PubMed ID: 30185581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.