These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29451926)

  • 21. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivate for root coverage: 2-year results of an RCT using 3D digital measuring for volumetric comparison of gingival dimensions.
    Zuhr O; Rebele SF; Vach K; Petsos H; Hürzeler MB;
    J Clin Periodontol; 2020 Sep; 47(9):1144-1158. PubMed ID: 32510644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical application of autologous fibroblast cell culture in gingival recession treatment.
    Milinkovic I; Aleksic Z; Jankovic S; Popovic O; Bajic M; Cakic S; Lekovic V
    J Periodontal Res; 2015 Jun; 50(3):363-70. PubMed ID: 25040690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 1: Comparison of clinical parameters.
    McGuire MK; Nunn M
    J Periodontol; 2003 Aug; 74(8):1110-25. PubMed ID: 14514224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Coronally advanced flap with or without porcine collagen matrix for root coverage: a randomized clinical trial.
    Moreira ARO; Santamaria MP; Silvério KG; Casati MZ; Nociti Junior FH; Sculean A; Sallum EA
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Dec; 20(9):2539-2549. PubMed ID: 26917493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predictor factors for long-term outcomes stability of coronally advanced flap with or without connective tissue graft in the treatment of single maxillary gingival recessions: 9 years results of a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Rasperini G; Acunzo R; Pellegrini G; Pagni G; Tonetti M; Pini Prato GP; Cortellini P
    J Clin Periodontol; 2018 Sep; 45(9):1107-1117. PubMed ID: 29777632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part I. Clinical and patient-centred outcomes.
    Zuhr O; Rebele SF; Schneider D; Jung RE; Hürzeler MB
    J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jun; 41(6):582-92. PubMed ID: 24117676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Enamel matrix proteins (Emdogain) in combination with coronally advanced flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of shallow gingival recessions.
    Berlucchi I; Francetti L; Del Fabbro M; Testori T; Weinstein RL
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Dec; 22(6):583-93. PubMed ID: 12516830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Semilunar coronally positioned flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession: a 30-month follow-up study.
    Bittencourt S; Ribeiro Edel P; Sallum EA; Sallum AW; Nociti FH; Casati MZ
    J Periodontol; 2009 Jul; 80(7):1076-82. PubMed ID: 19563287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB plus β-tricalcium phosphate or connective tissue: comparison of clinical parameters at 5 years.
    McGuire MK; Scheyer ET; Snyder MB
    J Periodontol; 2014 Oct; 85(10):1361-70. PubMed ID: 24694077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Split-mouth evaluation of connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative for the treatment of isolated gingival recession defects in dogs.
    Shirakata Y; Nakamura T; Shinohara Y; Nakamura-Hasegawa K; Hashiguchi C; Takeuchi N; Imafuji T; Sculean A; Noguchi K
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Aug; 23(8):3339-3349. PubMed ID: 30506228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison between a xenogeneic dermal matrix and connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Meza-Mauricio J; Cortez-Gianezzi J; Duarte PM; Tavelli L; Rasperini G; de Faveri M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Dec; 25(12):6919-6929. PubMed ID: 34021404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of the efficacy and long-term stability of tunnel technique and coronally advanced flap in the treatment of gingival recession: a Meta-analysis.
    Cheng X; Tang R; Ge Z
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Aug; 41(4):450-462. PubMed ID: 37474478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of EDTA root conditioning on the outcome of coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Barootchi S; Tavelli L; Ravidà A; Wang CW; Wang HL
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Nov; 22(8):2727-2741. PubMed ID: 30293186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The influence of local anatomy on the outcome of treatment of gingival recession associated with non-carious cervical lesions.
    Santamaria MP; Ambrosano GM; Casati MZ; Nociti FH; Sallum AW; Sallum EA
    J Periodontol; 2010 Jul; 81(7):1027-34. PubMed ID: 20214443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part II. Volumetric studies on healing dynamics and gingival dimensions.
    Rebele SF; Zuhr O; Schneider D; Jung RE; Hürzeler MB
    J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jun; 41(6):593-603. PubMed ID: 24708338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Patient-centered outcomes after subepithelial connective tissue grafts and coronally advanced flaps.
    Roman A; Balazsi R; Câmpian RS; Soancă A; Moldovan R; Sculean A; Stratul SI
    Quintessence Int; 2012; 43(10):841-51. PubMed ID: 23115762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Root coverage by coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft and/or enamel matrix derivative: a meta-analysis.
    Cheng GL; Fu E; Tu YK; Shen EC; Chiu HC; Huang RY; Yuh DY; Chiang CY
    J Periodontal Res; 2015 Apr; 50(2):220-30. PubMed ID: 25039691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of root coverage with and without connective tissue graft for the treatment of single maxillary gingival recession using an image analysis system: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Lops D; Gobbato L; Nart J; Guazzo R; Ho DK; Bressan E
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2015; 35(2):247-54. PubMed ID: 25738345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Long-term evaluation (20 years) of the outcomes of subepithelial connective tissue graft plus coronally advanced flap in the treatment of maxillary single recession-type defects.
    Pini Prato GP; Franceschi D; Cortellini P; Chambrone L
    J Periodontol; 2018 Nov; 89(11):1290-1299. PubMed ID: 29873085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparative Evaluation of Coronally Advanced Flap with and without Bioactive Glass Putty in the Management of Gingival Recession Defects: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Bansal A; Kulloli A; Kathariya R; Shetty S; Jain H; Raikar S
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2016 Jan; 18(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 26764966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.