1005 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29452283)
21. Minimally Invasive Versus Traditional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Single-Level Spondylolisthesis Grades 1 and 2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Qin R; Liu B; Zhou P; Yao Y; Hao J; Yang K; Xu TL; Zhang F; Chen X
World Neurosurg; 2019 Feb; 122():180-189. PubMed ID: 30414524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Fusion technique does not affect short-term patient-reported outcomes for lumbar degenerative disease.
Divi SN; Schroeder GD; Goyal DKC; Radcliff KE; Galetta MS; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Kurd MF; Rihn JA; Kaye ID; Woods BR; Vaccaro AR; Kepler CK
Spine J; 2019 Dec; 19(12):1960-1968. PubMed ID: 31356987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with stenosis.
Cheng X; Zhang K; Sun X; Zhao C; Li H; Ni B; Zhao J
Spine J; 2017 Aug; 17(8):1127-1133. PubMed ID: 28416439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Does Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Have Advantages over Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis?
Fujimori T; Le H; Schairer WW; Berven SH; Qamirani E; Hu SS
Global Spine J; 2015 Apr; 5(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 25844282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Mini-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion augmented by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation: a comparison of surgical outcomes in adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.
Kim JS; Kang BU; Lee SH; Jung B; Choi YG; Jeon SH; Lee HY
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Apr; 22(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 19342933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5-year follow-up from the prospective multicenter Quality Outcomes Database registry.
Chan AK; Bydon M; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Shaffrey CI; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Michalopoulos GD; Guan J; Haid RW; Agarwal N; Park C; Chou D; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurg Focus; 2023 Jan; 54(1):E2. PubMed ID: 36587409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterolateral instrumented fusion (PLF) in degenerative lumbar disorders: a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up.
Høy K; Bünger C; Niederman B; Helmig P; Hansen ES; Li H; Andersen T
Eur Spine J; 2013 Sep; 22(9):2022-9. PubMed ID: 23584162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. In Single-Level, Open, Posterior Lumbar Fusion, Does Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion or Posterolateral Fusion Lead to Better Outcomes?
Chanbour H; Steinle AM; Tang AR; Gardocki RJ; Abtahi AM; Stephens BF; Zuckerman SL
Neurosurgery; 2023 Jan; 92(1):110-117. PubMed ID: 36519862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of interbody fusion compared with posterolateral fusion on lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Dantas F; Dantas FLR; Botelho RV
Spine J; 2022 May; 22(5):756-768. PubMed ID: 34896611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: An Analysis of the Prospective Quality Outcomes Database.
Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Foley KT; Glassman SD; Shaffrey CI; Wang MY; Park P; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Guan J; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurgery; 2020 Sep; 87(3):555-562. PubMed ID: 32409828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparing rates of early pedicle screw loosening in posterolateral lumbar fusion with and without transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Kim DH; Hwang RW; Lee GH; Joshi R; Baker KC; Arnold P; Sasso R; Park D; Fischgrund J
Spine J; 2020 Sep; 20(9):1438-1445. PubMed ID: 32387295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Clinical outcomes of single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis by minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with bilateral tubular channels].
Zeng ZL; Jia L; Yu Y; Xu W; Hu X; Zhan XH; Jia YW; Wang JJ; Cheng LM
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 55(4):279-284. PubMed ID: 28355766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Dynamic stabilization for L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with more than 2 years of follow-up.
Kuo CH; Chang PY; Wu JC; Chang HK; Fay LY; Tu TH; Cheng H; Huang WC
Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Jan; 40(1):E3. PubMed ID: 26721577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using the biportal endoscopic techniques versus microscopic tubular technique.
Kang MS; You KH; Choi JY; Heo DH; Chung HJ; Park HJ
Spine J; 2021 Dec; 21(12):2066-2077. PubMed ID: 34171465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: 2-year assessment of narcotic use, return to work, disability, and quality of life.
Adogwa O; Parker SL; Bydon A; Cheng J; McGirt MJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Dec; 24(8):479-84. PubMed ID: 21336176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis by instrumented posterolateral versus instrumented posterolateral with transforaminal lumbar interbody single-level fusion.
Kelly JP; Alcala-Marquez C; Dawson JM; Mehbod AA; Pinto MR
J Spine Surg; 2019 Sep; 5(3):351-357. PubMed ID: 31663046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparative study of perioperative complications between transforaminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Liu J; Deng H; Long X; Chen X; Xu R; Liu Z
Eur Spine J; 2016 May; 25(5):1575-1580. PubMed ID: 26126415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?
Adogwa O; Elsamadicy AA; Han JL; Cheng J; Karikari I; Bagley CA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):689-696. PubMed ID: 26722957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Radiological and Clinical Comparison of Posterolateral Fusion and Transforaminal Interbody Fusion Techniques in Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis.
Bozkurt G; Isikay I; Hanalioglu S
World Neurosurg; 2018 Aug; 116():e1060-e1065. PubMed ID: 29864570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Percutaneous Endoscopic Robot-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PE RA-TLIF) for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Technical Note and Two Years Clinical Results.
Chang M; Wang L; Yuan S; Tian Y; Zhao Y; Liu X
Pain Physician; 2022 Jan; 25(1):E73-E86. PubMed ID: 35051154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
