These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29452426)

  • 41. [How Scientific Publishing works].
    De Fiore L
    Recenti Prog Med; 2008; 99(7-8):372-6. PubMed ID: 18751617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Open Access uptake by universities worldwide.
    Robinson-Garcia N; Costas R; van Leeuwen TN
    PeerJ; 2020; 8():e9410. PubMed ID: 32714658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. National differences in dissemination and use of open access literature.
    Simard MA; Ghiasi G; Mongeon P; Larivière V
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0272730. PubMed ID: 35943972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. What I learned from predatory publishers.
    Beall J
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2017 Jun; 27(2):273-278. PubMed ID: 28694718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Manuscript Submission Invitations from 'Predatory Journals': What Should Authors Do?
    Kebede M; Schmaus-Klughammer AE; Tekle BT
    J Korean Med Sci; 2017 May; 32(5):709-712. PubMed ID: 28378541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The Open Access initiative in scientific and biomedical publishing: fourth in the series on editorship.
    Liesegang TJ; Schachat AP; Albert DM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jan; 139(1):156-67. PubMed ID: 15652842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Publishing in Oncology Nursing: A Look to the Past, Present, and Future.
    Schulmeister L
    Semin Oncol Nurs; 2018 Nov; 34(4):329-337. PubMed ID: 30270140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals.
    Wicherts JM
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0147913. PubMed ID: 26824759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Publishing Ethics and Predatory Practices: A Dilemma for All Stakeholders of Science Communication.
    Gasparyan AY; Yessirkepov M; Diyanova SN; Kitas GD
    J Korean Med Sci; 2015 Aug; 30(8):1010-6. PubMed ID: 26240476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The five deadly sins of science publishing.
    Tracz V
    F1000Res; 2015; 4():112. PubMed ID: 26097694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. For free or for fee? Dilemma of small scientific journals.
    Kljaković-Gaspić M; Petrak J; Rudan I; Biloglav Z
    Croat Med J; 2007 Jun; 48(3):292-9. PubMed ID: 17589971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The end of print: digitization and its consequence--revolutionary changes in scholarly and social communication and in scientific research.
    Davidson LA
    Int J Toxicol; 2005; 24(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 15981737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. 10 years experience with pioneering open access publishing in health informatics: the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR).
    Eysenbach G
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 160(Pt 2):1329-33. PubMed ID: 20841900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Trends of electronic publishing in medicine and life sciences].
    Strelski-Waisman N; Waisman D
    Harefuah; 2005 Sep; 144(9):634-8, 676, 675. PubMed ID: 16218535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Open access publishing -- panacea or Trojan horse?
    Graczyński MR; Moses L
    Med Sci Monit; 2004 Jan; 10(1):ED1-3. PubMed ID: 14704638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. How society publishers can accelerate their transition to open access and align with Plan S.
    Wise A; Estelle L
    Learn Publ; 2020 Jan; 33(1):14-27. PubMed ID: 32089590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Figureheads, ghost-writers and pseudonymous quant bloggers: the recent evolution of authorship in science publishing.
    Charlton BG
    Med Hypotheses; 2008 Oct; 71(4):475-80. PubMed ID: 18755552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Rules to be adopted for publishing a scientific paper.
    Picardi N
    Ann Ital Chir; 2016; 87():1-3. PubMed ID: 28474609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Exploring new frontiers of electronic publishing in biomedical science.
    Ng KH
    Singapore Med J; 2009 Mar; 50(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 19352562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Gold or green: the debate on open access policies.
    Abadal E
    Int Microbiol; 2013 Sep; 16(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 24568035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.