191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29453054)
1. Determining the number of contributors to DNA mixtures in the low-template regime: Exploring the impacts of sampling and detection effects.
Norsworthy S; Lun DS; Grgicak CM
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2018 May; 32():1-8. PubMed ID: 29453054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An assessment of the information content of likelihood ratios derived from complex mixtures.
Marsden CD; Rudin N; Inman K; Lohmueller KE
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():64-72. PubMed ID: 26851613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Distinguishing between donors and their relatives in complex DNA mixtures with binary models.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():95-109. PubMed ID: 26745184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inclusion probability with dropout: an operational formula.
Milot E; Courteau J; Crispino F; Mailly F
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():71-76. PubMed ID: 25559642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CEESIt: A computational tool for the interpretation of STR mixtures.
Swaminathan H; Garg A; Grgicak CM; Medard M; Lun DS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():149-160. PubMed ID: 26946255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Familial searching on DNA mixtures with dropout.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():128-138. PubMed ID: 26905597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using simulated microhaplotype genotyping data to evaluate the value of machine learning algorithms for inferring DNA mixture contributor numbers.
Wang H; Zhu Q; Huang Y; Cao Y; Hu Y; Wei Y; Wang Y; Hou T; Shan T; Dai X; Zhang X; Wang Y; Zhang J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Mar; 69():103008. PubMed ID: 38244524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of a DNA mixture statistics tool incorporating allelic drop-out and drop-in.
Mitchell AA; Tamariz J; O'Connell K; Ducasse N; Budimlija Z; Prinz M; Caragine T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):749-61. PubMed ID: 22999739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Precision DNA Mixture Interpretation with Single-Cell Profiling.
Ge J; King JL; Smuts A; Budowle B
Genes (Basel); 2021 Oct; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 34828255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigation into the effect of mixtures comprising related people on non-donor likelihood ratios, and potential practises to mitigate providing misleading opinions.
Kalafut T; Bright JA; Taylor D; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102691. PubMed ID: 35390645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Least-square deconvolution: a framework for interpreting short tandem repeat mixtures.
Wang T; Xue N; Birdwell JD
J Forensic Sci; 2006 Nov; 51(6):1284-97. PubMed ID: 17199614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. TrueAllele(®) Genotype Identification on DNA Mixtures Containing up to Five Unknown Contributors.
Perlin MW; Hornyak JM; Sugimoto G; Miller KW
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jul; 60(4):857-68. PubMed ID: 26189920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identifying contributors of DNA mixtures by means of quantitative information of STR typing.
Tvedebrink T; Eriksen PS; Mogensen HS; Morling N
J Comput Biol; 2012 Jul; 19(7):887-902. PubMed ID: 21210742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Complex DNA mixture analysis in a forensic context: evaluating the probative value using a likelihood ratio model.
Haned H; Benschop CCG; Gill PD; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():17-25. PubMed ID: 25485478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of large-scale highly polymorphic microhaplotypes in complex DNA mixtures analysis using RMNE method.
Zhu Q; Wang H; Cao Y; Huang Y; Wei Y; Hu Y; Dai X; Shan T; Wang Y; Zhang J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jul; 65():102874. PubMed ID: 37075688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mixture interpretation: Experimental and simulated reevaluation of qualitative analysis.
Manabe S; Mori Y; Kawai C; Ozeki M; Tamaki K
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2013 Mar; 15(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 23089142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. EuroForMix: An open source software based on a continuous model to evaluate STR DNA profiles from a mixture of contributors with artefacts.
Bleka Ø; Storvik G; Gill P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():35-44. PubMed ID: 26720812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. NOCIt: a computational method to infer the number of contributors to DNA samples analyzed by STR genotyping.
Swaminathan H; Grgicak CM; Medard M; Lun DS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():172-180. PubMed ID: 25625964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
Taylor D; Bright JA; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Sep; 7(5):516-28. PubMed ID: 23948322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating forensic DNA profiles using peak heights, allowing for multiple donors, allelic dropout and stutters.
Puch-Solis R; Rodgers L; Mazumder A; Pope S; Evett I; Curran J; Balding D
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Sep; 7(5):555-63. PubMed ID: 23948327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
