289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29453054)
21. Evaluation of large-scale highly polymorphic microhaplotypes in complex DNA mixtures analysis using RMNE method.
Zhu Q; Wang H; Cao Y; Huang Y; Wei Y; Hu Y; Dai X; Shan T; Wang Y; Zhang J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jul; 65():102874. PubMed ID: 37075688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Expanding beyond the current core STR loci: An exploration of 73 STR markers with increased diversity for enhanced DNA mixture deconvolution.
Novroski NMM; Wendt FR; Woerner AE; Bus MM; Coble M; Budowle B
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jan; 38():121-129. PubMed ID: 30396008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Mixture interpretation: Experimental and simulated reevaluation of qualitative analysis.
Manabe S; Mori Y; Kawai C; Ozeki M; Tamaki K
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2013 Mar; 15(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 23089142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. EuroForMix: An open source software based on a continuous model to evaluate STR DNA profiles from a mixture of contributors with artefacts.
Bleka Ø; Storvik G; Gill P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():35-44. PubMed ID: 26720812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Facilitating complex DNA mixture interpretation by sequencing highly polymorphic haplotypes.
Voskoboinik L; Motro U; Darvasi A
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jul; 35():136-140. PubMed ID: 29775859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accurate assessment of the weight of evidence for DNA mixtures by integrating the likelihood ratio.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Mar; 27():1-16. PubMed ID: 27914277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Implementation and validation of an improved allele specific stutter filtering method for electropherogram interpretation.
Kalafut T; Schuerman C; Sutton J; Faris T; Armogida L; Bright JA; Buckleton J; Taylor D
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jul; 35():50-56. PubMed ID: 29660688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Validating TrueAllele
Bauer DW; Butt N; Hornyak JM; Perlin MW
J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):380-398. PubMed ID: 31580496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. NOCIt: a computational method to infer the number of contributors to DNA samples analyzed by STR genotyping.
Swaminathan H; Grgicak CM; Medard M; Lun DS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():172-180. PubMed ID: 25625964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Performance of a method for weighting a range in the number of contributors in probabilistic genotyping.
McGovern C; Cheng K; Kelly H; Ciecko A; Taylor D; Buckleton JS; Bright JA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102352. PubMed ID: 32707473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The efficacy of DNA mixture to mixture matching.
Bright JA; Taylor D; Kerr Z; Buckleton J; Kruijver M
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():64-71. PubMed ID: 30986620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
Taylor D; Bright JA; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Sep; 7(5):516-28. PubMed ID: 23948322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluating forensic DNA profiles using peak heights, allowing for multiple donors, allelic dropout and stutters.
Puch-Solis R; Rodgers L; Mazumder A; Pope S; Evett I; Curran J; Balding D
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Sep; 7(5):555-63. PubMed ID: 23948327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Internal validation of STRmix™ for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
Moretti TR; Just RS; Kehl SC; Willis LE; Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Onorato AJ
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():126-144. PubMed ID: 28504203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Empirical analysis of the STR profiles resulting from conceptual mixtures.
Paoletti DR; Doom TE; Krane CM; Raymer ML; Krane DE
J Forensic Sci; 2005 Nov; 50(6):1361-6. PubMed ID: 16382829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A top-down approach to DNA mixtures.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 May; 46():102250. PubMed ID: 32169810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Towards understanding the effect of uncertainty in the number of contributors to DNA stains.
Buckleton JS; Curran JM; Gill P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Mar; 1(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 19083724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Estimation of the number of contributors of theoretical mixture profiles based on allele counting: Does increasing the number of loci increase success rate of estimates?
Dembinski GM; Sobieralski C; Picard CJ
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Mar; 33():24-32. PubMed ID: 29175725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The molecular characterization of a depurinated trial DNA sample can be a model to understand the reliability of the results in forensic genetics.
Fattorini P; Previderè C; Sorçaburu-Cigliero S; Marrubini G; Alù M; Barbaro AM; Carnevali E; Carracedo A; Casarino L; Consoloni L; Corato S; Domenici R; Fabbri M; Giardina E; Grignani P; Baldassarra SL; Moratti M; Nicolin V; Pelotti S; Piccinini A; Pitacco P; Plizza L; Resta N; Ricci U; Robino C; Salvaderi L; Scarnicci F; Schneider PM; Seidita G; Trizzino L; Turchi C; Turrina S; Vatta P; Vecchiotti C; Verzeletti A; De Stefano F
Electrophoresis; 2014 Nov; 35(21-22):3134-44. PubMed ID: 25176610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effect of varying the number of contributors on likelihood ratios for complex DNA mixtures.
Benschop CCG; Haned H; Jeurissen L; Gill PD; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Nov; 19():92-99. PubMed ID: 26204570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
