These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29453496)
1. Influence of surface treatment on the performance of silorane-based composite resin in class I restorations: a randomized clinical trial. Marques IP; de Oliveira FBS; Souza JGS; Ferreira RC; Magalhães CS; França FMG; Popoff DAV Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Dec; 22(9):2989-2996. PubMed ID: 29453496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Five-year clinical performance of a silorane- vs a methacrylate-based composite combined with two different adhesive approaches. Baracco B; Fuentes MV; Ceballos L Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jun; 20(5):991-1001. PubMed ID: 26388406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Repair of dimethacrylate-based composite restorations by a silorane-based composite: a one-year randomized clinical trial. Popoff DA; Santa Rosa TT; Ferreira RC; Magalhães CS; Moreira AN; Mjör IA Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):E1-10. PubMed ID: 22616930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two-year clinical performance of dimethacrylatebased composite restorations repaired with a silorane-based composite. Popoff DA; de Magalhães CS; de Freitas Oliveira W; Soares LA; de Almeida Santa Rosa TT; Ferreira RC; Moreira AN; Mjör IA J Adhes Dent; 2014 Dec; 16(6):575-83. PubMed ID: 25516879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-year clinical evaluation of different restorative resins in class I restorations. Yazici AR; Ustunkol I; Ozgunaltay G; Dayangac B Oper Dent; 2014; 39(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 24754716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-year clinical evaluation of a silorane composite resin. Walter R; Boushell LW; Heymann HO; Ritter AV; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD; Chung Y; Swift EJ J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 24344912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microleakage and microtensile bond strength of silorane-based and dimethacrylate-based restorative systems. Santos MJ; Podorieszach A; Rizkalla AS; Santos GC Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013; 34 Spec No 8():19-24. PubMed ID: 24568172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Methacrylate- and silorane-based composite restorations: hardness, depth of cure and interfacial gap formation as a function of the energy dose. D'Alpino PH; Bechtold J; dos Santos PJ; Alonso RC; Di Hipólito V; Silikas N; Rodrigues FP Dent Mater; 2011 Nov; 27(11):1162-9. PubMed ID: 21925724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial. Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Practice-based, clinical trial of a silorane-based composite resin system in posterior teeth. Malhotra N; Somashekar ST; Mala K; Pai V; Shenoy R SADJ; 2013 Sep; 68(8):358, 360-3. PubMed ID: 24660403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. One-year clinical evaluation of composite restorations in posterior teeth: effect of adhesive systems. Sundfeld RH; Scatolin RS; Oliveira FG; Machado LS; Alexandre RS; Sundefeld ML Oper Dent; 2012; 37(6):E1-8. PubMed ID: 22621163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Two-Year Clinical Evaluation of a Nanofilled Etch-and-Rinse and a Self-Etch Adhesive System Containing MDPB and Fluoride in Non-carious Cervical Lesions. de Oliveira FG; Machado LS; Sundfeld-Neto D; Giannini M; Briso AL; Dos Santos PH; Sundefeld ML; Sundfeld RH Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2017 Mar; 38(3):e1-e4. PubMed ID: 28257217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical performance of posterior restorations using a universal adhesive over moist and dry dentin: A 36-month double-blind split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Ñaupari-Villasante R; Falconi-Páez C; Castro AS; Gutiérrez MF; Mendez-Bauer ML; Aliaga P; Dávila-Sánchez A; Arrais C; Reis A; Loguercio AD J Dent; 2024 Aug; 147():105080. PubMed ID: 38788919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique. Baratieri LN; Ritter AV J Esthet Restor Dent; 2001; 13(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 11831309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical Evaluation of a Silorane- and a Methacrylate-Based Resin Composite in Class II Restorations: 24-Month Results. Karaman E; Yazici AR; Ozgunaltay G; Ustunkol I; Berber A Oper Dent; 2017; 42(4):E102-E110. PubMed ID: 28682704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Two-year clinical performance of Clearfil SE and Clearfil S3 in restoration of unabraded non-carious class V lesions. Brackett MG; Dib A; Franco G; Estrada BE; Brackett WW Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 20533626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of dentin roughness on the adhesive performance in non-carious cervical lesions: A double-blind randomized clinical trial. Loguercio AD; Luque-Martinez IV; Fuentes S; Reis A; Muñoz MA J Dent; 2018 Feb; 69():60-69. PubMed ID: 28962842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical, double blind, randomized controlled trial of experimental adhesive protocols in caries-affected dentin. Pintado-Palomino K; de Almeida CVVB; da Motta RJG; Fortes JHP; Tirapelli C Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Apr; 23(4):1855-1864. PubMed ID: 30218228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of different monomer-based composites and acid etching pre-treatment of enamel on the microleakage using self-etch adhesives systems. Catelan A; Giorgi MC; Soares GP; Lima DA; Marchi GM; Aguiar FH Acta Odontol Scand; 2014 Nov; 72(8):651-5. PubMed ID: 24580091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage resin composite in endodontically treated premolars: 3-year follow-up. Gönülol N; Kalyoncuoğlu E; Ertaş E; Misilli T Clin Oral Investig; 2019 May; 23(5):2323-2330. PubMed ID: 30293184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]