These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29453496)
21. 1-Year clinical study of indirect resin composite restorations luted with a self-adhesive resin cement: effect of enamel etching. Azevedo CG; De Goes MF; Ambrosano GM; Chan DC Braz Dent J; 2012; 23(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 22666765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Total-etch versus self-etch adhesive: effect on postoperative sensitivity. Perdigão J; Geraldeli S; Hodges JS J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Dec; 134(12):1621-9. PubMed ID: 14719760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Marginal integrity of low-shrinking versus methacrylate-based composite: effect of different one-step self-etch adhesives. Gregor L; Dorien L; Bortolotto T; Feilzer AJ; Krejci I Odontology; 2017 Jul; 105(3):291-299. PubMed ID: 27803985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel. Van Meerbeek B; Kanumilli P; De Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Lambrechts P; Peumans M Dent Mater; 2005 Apr; 21(4):375-83. PubMed ID: 15766585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A three-year prospective randomized study of silorane- and methacrylate-based composite restorative systems in class II restorations. Mahmoud SH; Ali AK; Hegazi HA J Adhes Dent; 2014 Jun; 16(3):285-92. PubMed ID: 24779025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of surface treatments on microtensile bond strength of repaired aged silorane resin composite. Palasuk J; Platt JA; Cho SD; Levon JA; Brown DT; Hovijitra ST Oper Dent; 2013; 38(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 22830537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations. Souza-Junior EJ; Prieto LT; Araújo CT; Paulillo LA Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month clinical evaluation. Mena-Serrano A; Kose C; De Paula EA; Tay LY; Reis A; Loguercio AD; Perdigão J J Esthet Restor Dent; 2013 Feb; 25(1):55-69. PubMed ID: 23374411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Two-year clinical trial of a universal adhesive in total-etch and self-etch mode in non-carious cervical lesions. Lawson NC; Robles A; Fu CC; Lin CP; Sawlani K; Burgess JO J Dent; 2015 Oct; 43(10):1229-34. PubMed ID: 26231300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A 7-year randomized prospective study of a one-step self-etching adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. The effect of curing modes and restorative material. van Dijken JW; Pallesen U J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40(12):1060-7. PubMed ID: 22955004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Randomized controlled trial of the 2-year clinical performance of a silorane-based resin composite in class 1 posterior restorations. Efes BG; Yaman BC; Gurbuz O; Gumuştaş B Am J Dent; 2013 Feb; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 23724547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A double-blind randomized clinical trial of a silorane-based resin composite in class 2 restorations: 18-month follow-up. Gonçalves FS; Leal CD; Bueno AC; Freitas AB; Moreira AN; Magalhães CS Am J Dent; 2013 Apr; 26(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 24073532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results. Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Two-year clinical performance of self-etching adhesive systems in composite restorations of anterior teeth. Barcellos DC; Batista GR; Silva MA; Pleffken PR; Rangel PM; Fernandes VV; Di Nicoló R; Torres CR Oper Dent; 2013; 38(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 23110580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Eighteen-month clinical performance of a self-etching primer in unprepared class V resin restorations. Brackett WW; Brackett MG; Dib A; Franco G; Estudillo H Oper Dent; 2005; 30(4):424-9. PubMed ID: 16130861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems. Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage composite in posterior restorations: one-year results. Baracco B; Perdigão J; Cabrera E; Giráldez I; Ceballos L Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):117-29. PubMed ID: 22313275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Two-year clinical performance of a low-shrinkage composite in posterior restorations. Baracco B; Perdigão J; Cabrera E; Ceballos L Oper Dent; 2013; 38(6):591-600. PubMed ID: 23570300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Eight-year randomized clinical evaluation of Class II nanohybrid resin composite restorations bonded with a one-step self-etch or a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive. van Dijken JW; Pallesen U Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Jul; 19(6):1371-9. PubMed ID: 25359327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical Effectiveness of Different Polishing Systems and Self-Etch Adhesives in Class V Composite Resin Restorations: Two-Year Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Jang JH; Kim HY; Shin SM; Lee CO; Kim DS; Choi KK; Kim SY Oper Dent; 2017; 42(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 28002695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]