BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29453717)

  • 1. U-tube based near-surface environmental monitoring in the Shenhua carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) project.
    Li Q; Song R; Shi H; Ma J; Liu X; Li X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Apr; 25(12):12034-12052. PubMed ID: 29453717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling the key factors that could influence the diffusion of CO
    Li Q; Shi H; Yang D; Wei X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Feb; 24(4):3727-3738. PubMed ID: 27888483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Potential CO
    Derakhshan-Nejad Z; Sun J; Yun ST; Lee G
    Environ Geochem Health; 2019 Oct; 41(5):2339-2364. PubMed ID: 30826969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Separation and capture of CO2 from large stationary sources and sequestration in geological formations--coalbeds and deep saline aquifers.
    White CM; Strazisar BR; Granite EJ; Hoffman JS; Pennline HW;
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2003 Jun; 53(6):645-715. PubMed ID: 12828330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monitoring of a simulated CO(2) leakage in a shallow aquifer using stable carbon isotopes.
    Schulz A; Vogt C; Lamert H; Peter A; Heinrich B; Dahmke A; Richnow HH
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Oct; 46(20):11243-50. PubMed ID: 23002713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CO
    Rastelli E; Corinaldesi C; Dell'Anno A; Amaro T; Greco S; Lo Martire M; Carugati L; Queirós AM; Widdicombe S; Danovaro R
    Mar Environ Res; 2016 Dec; 122():158-168. PubMed ID: 27816195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of potential, cost, and environmental benefits of CCS-EWR technology for coal-fired power plants in Yellow River Basin of China.
    Xu M; Zhang X; Shen S; Wei S; Fan JL
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Aug; 292():112717. PubMed ID: 34015611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Early atmospheric detection of carbon dioxide from carbon capture and storage sites.
    Pak NM; Rempillo O; Norman AL; Layzell DB
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Aug; 66(8):739-47. PubMed ID: 27111469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Framework for the assessment of interaction between CO2 geological storage and other sedimentary basin resources.
    Michael K; Whittaker S; Varma S; Bekele E; Langhi L; Hodgkinson J; Harris B
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2016 Feb; 18(2):164-75. PubMed ID: 26767550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using Prokaryotes for Carbon Capture Storage.
    Hicks N; Vik U; Taylor P; Ladoukakis E; Park J; Kolisis F; Jakobsen KS
    Trends Biotechnol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 27712920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Carbon capture and storage (CCS) and its potential role to mitigate carbon emission in China].
    Chen WY; Wu ZX; Wang WZ
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2007 Jun; 28(6):1178-82. PubMed ID: 17674718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A review of CO2 sequestration projects and application in China.
    Tang Y; Yang R; Bian X
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():381854. PubMed ID: 25302323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensitivity thresholds of groundwater parameters for detecting CO
    Berger PM; Wimmer B; Iranmanesh A
    Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Oct; 191(11):685. PubMed ID: 31659477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Feasibility of a perfluorocarbon tracer based network to support monitoring, verification, and accounting of sequestered CO₂.
    Watson TB; Sullivan T
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Feb; 46(3):1692-9. PubMed ID: 22243211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Deep CCS: Moving Beyond 90% Carbon Dioxide Capture.
    Dods MN; Kim EJ; Long JR; Weston SC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Jul; 55(13):8524-8534. PubMed ID: 34157836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Water challenges for geologic carbon capture and sequestration.
    Newmark RL; Friedmann SJ; Carroll SA
    Environ Manage; 2010 Apr; 45(4):651-61. PubMed ID: 20127328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Illustrative national scale scenarios of environmental and human health impacts of Carbon Capture and Storage.
    Tzanidakis K; Oxley T; Cockerill T; ApSimon H
    Environ Int; 2013 Jun; 56():48-64. PubMed ID: 23603732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discussion of the influence of CO and CH4 in CO2 transport, injection, and storage for CCS technology.
    Blanco ST; Rivas C; Bravo R; Fernández J; Artal M; Velasco I
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Sep; 48(18):10984-92. PubMed ID: 25140928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 1. Emissions modeling and analysis of air pollution measurements.
    Kelly F; Anderson HR; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Barratt B; Beevers S; Derwent D; Green D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Apr; (155):5-71. PubMed ID: 21830496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Siting is a constraint to realize environmental benefits from carbon capture and storage.
    Sekar A; Williams E; Chester M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Oct; 48(19):11705-12. PubMed ID: 25187199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.