BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29453880)

  • 1. Information bias in epidemiological studies with a special focus on obstetrics and gynecology.
    Kesmodel US
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Apr; 97(4):417-423. PubMed ID: 29453880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An overview of confounding. Part 2: how to identify it and special situations.
    Howards PP
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Apr; 97(4):400-406. PubMed ID: 29341101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methodological issues regarding confounding and exposure misclassification in epidemiological studies of occupational exposures.
    Blair A; Stewart P; Lubin JH; Forastiere F
    Am J Ind Med; 2007 Mar; 50(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 17096363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bias due to non-differential misclassification of polytomous confounders.
    Brenner H
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1993 Jan; 46(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 8433115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cohort studies in the context of obstetric and gynecologic research: a methodologic overview.
    Messerlian C; Basso O
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Apr; 97(4):371-379. PubMed ID: 29194569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An overview of confounding. Part 1: the concept and how to address it.
    Howards PP
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Apr; 97(4):394-399. PubMed ID: 29341103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Classification bias in epidemiological studies].
    Zieliński A
    Przegl Epidemiol; 2008; 62(2):461-70. PubMed ID: 18807495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interpreting the literature in obstetrics and gynecology: I. Key concepts in epidemiology and biostatistics.
    Peterson HB; Kleinbaum DG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Oct; 78(4):710-7. PubMed ID: 1923179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bias in occupational epidemiology studies.
    Pearce N; Checkoway H; Kriebel D
    Occup Environ Med; 2007 Aug; 64(8):562-8. PubMed ID: 17053019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Misclassification of the mediator matters when estimating indirect effects.
    Blakely T; McKenzie S; Carter K
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2013 May; 67(5):458-66. PubMed ID: 23386673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exposure-dependent misclassification of exposure in interaction analyses.
    Lundberg M; Hallqvist J; Diderichsen F
    Epidemiology; 1999 Sep; 10(5):545-9. PubMed ID: 10468429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differential misclassification arising from nondifferential errors in exposure measurement.
    Flegal KM; Keyl PM; Nieto FJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 1991 Nov; 134(10):1233-44. PubMed ID: 1746532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patterns of bias due to differential misclassification by case-control status in a case-control study.
    Chyou PH
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2007; 22(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 17225958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cross-sectional studies - what are they good for?
    Kesmodel US
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Apr; 97(4):388-393. PubMed ID: 29453895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attribute frequency and misclassification bias.
    Sosenko JM; Gardner LB
    J Chronic Dis; 1987; 40(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 3818875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of joint misclassification of exposure and disease on epidemiologic measures of association.
    Brenner H; Savitz DA; Gefeller O
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1993 Oct; 46(10):1195-202. PubMed ID: 8410104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bias and causal associations in observational research.
    Grimes DA; Schulz KF
    Lancet; 2002 Jan; 359(9302):248-52. PubMed ID: 11812579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bias magnification in ecologic studies: a methodological investigation.
    Webster TF
    Environ Health; 2007 Jul; 6():17. PubMed ID: 17615079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. It's All How You "Spin" It: Interpretive Bias in Research Findings in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Literature.
    Turrentine M
    Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 129(2):239-242. PubMed ID: 28079777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of misclassification on the estimation of association: a review.
    Höfler M
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2005; 14(2):92-101. PubMed ID: 16175878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.