These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29453895)

  • 1. Cross-sectional studies - what are they good for?
    Kesmodel US
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Apr; 97(4):388-393. PubMed ID: 29453895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Information bias in epidemiological studies with a special focus on obstetrics and gynecology.
    Kesmodel US
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Apr; 97(4):417-423. PubMed ID: 29453880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpreting the literature in obstetrics and gynecology: I. Key concepts in epidemiology and biostatistics.
    Peterson HB; Kleinbaum DG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Oct; 78(4):710-7. PubMed ID: 1923179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cohort studies in the context of obstetric and gynecologic research: a methodologic overview.
    Messerlian C; Basso O
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Apr; 97(4):371-379. PubMed ID: 29194569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. General concepts in biostatistics and clinical epidemiology: Observational studies with cross-sectional and ecological designs.
    Cataldo R; Arancibia M; Stojanova J; Papuzinski C
    Medwave; 2019 Sep; 19(8):e7698. PubMed ID: 31596838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Knowledge, attitudes, and intentions toward fertility awareness and oocyte cryopreservation among obstetrics and gynecology resident physicians.
    Yu L; Peterson B; Inhorn MC; Boehm JK; Patrizio P
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):403-11. PubMed ID: 26677956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Critical Appraisal Skills Among Canadian Obstetrics and Gynaecology Residents: How Do They Fare?
    Bougie O; Posner G; Black AY
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2015 Jul; 37(7):639-647. PubMed ID: 26366822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Low fertility awareness in United States reproductive-aged women and medical trainees: creation and validation of the Fertility & Infertility Treatment Knowledge Score (FIT-KS).
    Kudesia R; Chernyak E; McAvey B
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Oct; 108(4):711-717. PubMed ID: 28911930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward cervical cancer among women attending Obstetrics and Gynecology Department: A cross-sectional, hospital-based survey in South India.
    Narayana G; Suchitra MJ; Sunanda G; Ramaiah JD; Kumar BP; Veerabhadrappa KV
    Indian J Cancer; 2017; 54(2):481-487. PubMed ID: 29469083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating the reproducibility of research in obstetrics and gynecology.
    Rauh S; Bowers A; Rorah D; Tritz D; Pate H; Frye L; Vassar M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Feb; 269():24-29. PubMed ID: 34954422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Burnout, depression, and career satisfaction: cross-sectional study of obstetrics and gynecology residents.
    Becker JL; Milad MP; Klock SC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 195(5):1444-9. PubMed ID: 17074551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Residency training in pediatric and adolescent gynecology across obstetrics and gynecology residency programs: a cross-sectional study.
    Solomon ER; Muffly TM; Hood C; Attaran M
    J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2013 Jun; 26(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 23566793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intrauterine device knowledge and practices: a national survey of obstetrics and gynecology residents.
    Tang J; Maurer R; Bartz D
    South Med J; 2013 Sep; 106(9):500-5. PubMed ID: 24002554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interpreting the term selection bias in medical research.
    Mark DH
    Fam Med; 1997 Feb; 29(2):132-6. PubMed ID: 9048175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality of websites of obstetrics and gynecology departments: a cross-sectional study.
    Rezniczek GA; Küppers L; Heuer H; Hefler LA; Buerkle B; Tempfer CB
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Apr; 15():103. PubMed ID: 25928159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic reviews of medical evidence: the use of meta-analysis in obstetrics and gynecology.
    Peipert JF; Bracken MB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Apr; 89(4):628-33. PubMed ID: 9083325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An overview of confounding. Part 1: the concept and how to address it.
    Howards PP
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Apr; 97(4):394-399. PubMed ID: 29341103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors influencing the career interest of medical graduates in obstetrics and gynaecology in Hong Kong: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey.
    Lam CY; Cheung CS; Hui AS
    Hong Kong Med J; 2016 Apr; 22(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 26915338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The case-control study: a primer for the obstetrician-gynecologist.
    Peipert JF; Grimes DA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jul; 84(1):140-5. PubMed ID: 8008310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An overview of confounding. Part 2: how to identify it and special situations.
    Howards PP
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Apr; 97(4):400-406. PubMed ID: 29341101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.