These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29454030)

  • 1. Using decision thresholds for ranking treatments in network meta-analysis results in more informative rankings.
    Brignardello-Petersen R; Johnston BC; Jadad AR; Tomlinson G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jun; 98():62-69. PubMed ID: 29454030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rapid methods including network meta-analysis to produce evidence in clinical decision support: a decision analysis.
    Eiring Ø; Brurberg KG; Nytrøen K; Nylenna M
    Syst Rev; 2018 Oct; 7(1):168. PubMed ID: 30342549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uncertainty in Treatment Rankings: Reanalysis of Network Meta-analyses of Randomized Trials.
    Trinquart L; Attiche N; Bafeta A; Porcher R; Ravaud P
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 May; 164(10):666-73. PubMed ID: 27089537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative summaries of treatment effect estimates obtained with network meta-analysis of survival curves to inform decision-making.
    Cope S; Jansen JP
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Dec; 13():147. PubMed ID: 24289277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using Normalized Entropy to Measure Uncertainty of Rankings for Network Meta-analyses.
    Wu YC; Shih MC; Tu YK
    Med Decis Making; 2021 Aug; 41(6):706-713. PubMed ID: 33754893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Impact of Excluding Trials from Network Meta-Analyses - An Empirical Study.
    Zhang J; Yuan Y; Chu H
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0165889. PubMed ID: 27926924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Continuously updated network meta-analysis and statistical monitoring for timely decision-making.
    Nikolakopoulou A; Mavridis D; Egger M; Salanti G
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 May; 27(5):1312-1330. PubMed ID: 27587588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Node-making process in network meta-analysis of nonpharmacological treatment are poorly reported.
    James A; Yavchitz A; Ravaud P; Boutron I
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 May; 97():95-102. PubMed ID: 29196202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meta-Review: Network Meta-Analyses in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.
    Cortese S; Tomlinson A; Cipriani A
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2019 Feb; 58(2):167-179. PubMed ID: 30738544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bias in identification of the best treatment in a Bayesian network meta-analysis for binary outcome: a simulation study.
    Kibret T; Richer D; Beyene J
    Clin Epidemiol; 2014; 6():451-60. PubMed ID: 25506247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Approaches to interpreting and choosing the best treatments in network meta-analyses.
    Mbuagbaw L; Rochwerg B; Jaeschke R; Heels-Andsell D; Alhazzani W; Thabane L; Guyatt GH
    Syst Rev; 2017 Apr; 6(1):79. PubMed ID: 28403893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Overlapping network meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies.
    Naudet F; Schuit E; Ioannidis JPA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1999-2008. PubMed ID: 29040566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Antithrombotic therapy in patients receiving saphenous vein coronary artery bypass grafts: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Solo K; Martin J; Lavi S; Kabali C; John-Baptiste A; Nevis IF; Choudhury T; Mamas MA; Bagur R
    BMJ Open; 2018 Apr; 8(4):e019555. PubMed ID: 29627809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bibliographic study showed improving statistical methodology of network meta-analyses published between 1999 and 2015.
    Petropoulou M; Nikolakopoulou A; Veroniki AA; Rios P; Vafaei A; Zarin W; Giannatsi M; Sullivan S; Tricco AC; Chaimani A; Egger M; Salanti G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Feb; 82():20-28. PubMed ID: 27864068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Living network meta-analysis was feasible when considering the pace of evidence generation.
    Créquit P; Martin-Montoya T; Attiche N; Trinquart L; Vivot A; Ravaud P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 108():10-16. PubMed ID: 30552957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Borrowing of strength from indirect evidence in 40 network meta-analyses.
    Lin L; Xing A; Kofler MJ; Murad MH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Feb; 106():41-49. PubMed ID: 30342086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A multifaceted graphical display, including treatment ranking, was developed to aid interpretation of network meta-analysis.
    Nevill CR; Cooper NJ; Sutton AJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 May; 157():83-91. PubMed ID: 36870376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Treatments for the Fifth Metacarpal Neck Fractures: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Zong SL; Zhao G; Su LX; Liang WD; Li LG; Cheng G; Wang AJ; Cao XQ; Zheng QT; Li LD; Kan SL
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Mar; 95(11):e3059. PubMed ID: 26986129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Cipriani A; Furukawa TA; Salanti G; Chaimani A; Atkinson LZ; Ogawa Y; Leucht S; Ruhe HG; Turner EH; Higgins JPT; Egger M; Takeshima N; Hayasaka Y; Imai H; Shinohara K; Tajika A; Ioannidis JPA; Geddes JR
    Lancet; 2018 Apr; 391(10128):1357-1366. PubMed ID: 29477251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.