These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29454111)

  • 41. Rational design of hyper-glycosylated interferon beta analogs: a computational strategy for glycoengineering.
    Samoudi M; Tabandeh F; Minuchehr Z; Ahangari Cohan R; Nouri Inanlou D; Khodabandeh M; Sabery Anvar M
    J Mol Graph Model; 2015 Mar; 56():31-42. PubMed ID: 25544388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Improved cryoEM-Guided Iterative Molecular Dynamics--Rosetta Protein Structure Refinement Protocol for High Precision Protein Structure Prediction.
    Lindert S; McCammon JA
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Mar; 11(3):1337-46. PubMed ID: 25883538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Experimental verification of force fields for molecular dynamics simulations using Gly-Pro-Gly-Gly.
    Aliev AE; Courtier-Murias D
    J Phys Chem B; 2010 Sep; 114(38):12358-75. PubMed ID: 20825228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Protein design for diversity of sequences and conformations using dead-end elimination.
    Hanf KJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 899():127-44. PubMed ID: 22735950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Benchmarking a computational design method for the incorporation of metal ion-binding sites at symmetric protein interfaces.
    Hansen WA; Khare SD
    Protein Sci; 2017 Aug; 26(8):1584-1594. PubMed ID: 28513090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Molecular dynamics simulations of B '-DNA: sequence effects on A-tract-induced bending and flexibility.
    McConnell KJ; Beveridge DL
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Nov; 314(1):23-40. PubMed ID: 11724529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Folding free energy function selects native-like protein sequences in the core but not on the surface.
    Jaramillo A; Wernisch L; Héry S; Wodak SJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2002 Oct; 99(21):13554-9. PubMed ID: 12368470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Protein backbone ensemble generation explores the local structural space of unseen natural homologs.
    Schenkelberg CD; Bystroff C
    Bioinformatics; 2016 May; 32(10):1454-61. PubMed ID: 26787668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Information-Driven, Ensemble Flexible Peptide Docking Using HADDOCK.
    Geng C; Narasimhan S; Rodrigues JP; Bonvin AM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1561():109-138. PubMed ID: 28236236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Iterative Molecular Dynamics-Rosetta Protein Structure Refinement Protocol to Improve Model Quality.
    Lindert S; Meiler J; McCammon JA
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2013 Aug; 9(8):3843-3847. PubMed ID: 23956701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Enzyme-like proteins from an unselected library of designed amino acid sequences.
    Wei Y; Hecht MH
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2004 Jan; 17(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 14985539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. RapidRMSD: rapid determination of RMSDs corresponding to motions of flexible molecules.
    Neveu E; Popov P; Hoffmann A; Migliosi A; Besseron X; Danoy G; Bouvry P; Grudinin S
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Aug; 34(16):2757-2765. PubMed ID: 29554205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Cosolvent-Based Molecular Dynamics for Ensemble Docking: Practical Method for Generating Druggable Protein Conformations.
    Uehara S; Tanaka S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Apr; 57(4):742-756. PubMed ID: 28388074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Coevolutionary Signals and Structure-Based Models for the Prediction of Protein Native Conformations.
    Dos Santos RN; Jiang X; Martínez L; Morcos F
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1851():83-103. PubMed ID: 30298393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Ensemble-based docking using biased molecular dynamics.
    Campbell AJ; Lamb ML; Joseph-McCarthy D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jul; 54(7):2127-38. PubMed ID: 24881672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Protocols for Requirement-Driven Protein Design in the Rosetta Modeling Program.
    Guffy SL; Teets FD; Langlois MI; Kuhlman B
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 May; 58(5):895-901. PubMed ID: 29659276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Hybrid MC/MD for protein design.
    Michael E; Polydorides S; Simonson T; Archontis G
    J Chem Phys; 2020 Aug; 153(5):054113. PubMed ID: 32770896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Improved PEP-FOLD Approach for Peptide and Miniprotein Structure Prediction.
    Shen Y; Maupetit J; Derreumaux P; Tufféry P
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2014 Oct; 10(10):4745-58. PubMed ID: 26588162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Sub-angstrom modeling of complexes between flexible peptides and globular proteins.
    Raveh B; London N; Schueler-Furman O
    Proteins; 2010 Jul; 78(9):2029-40. PubMed ID: 20455260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Molecular dynamics simulation for rational protein engineering: Present and future prospectus.
    Rouhani M; Khodabakhsh F; Norouzian D; Cohan RA; Valizadeh V
    J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Sep; 84():43-53. PubMed ID: 29909273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.