These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29454215)

  • 1. Effect-based trigger values for in vitro and in vivo bioassays performed on surface water extracts supporting the environmental quality standards (EQS) of the European Water Framework Directive.
    Escher BI; Aїt-Aїssa S; Behnisch PA; Brack W; Brion F; Brouwer A; Buchinger S; Crawford SE; Du Pasquier D; Hamers T; Hettwer K; Hilscherová K; Hollert H; Kase R; Kienle C; Tindall AJ; Tuerk J; van der Oost R; Vermeirssen E; Neale PA
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jul; 628-629():748-765. PubMed ID: 29454215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect-based trigger values for in vitro bioassays: Reading across from existing water quality guideline values.
    Escher BI; Neale PA; Leusch FD
    Water Res; 2015 Sep; 81():137-48. PubMed ID: 26057261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect-Based Trigger Values for Mixtures of Chemicals in Surface Water Detected with In Vitro Bioassays.
    Escher BI; Neale PA
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2021 Feb; 40(2):487-499. PubMed ID: 33252775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk-based approach in the revised European Union drinking water legislation: Opportunities for bioanalytical tools.
    Dingemans MM; Baken KA; van der Oost R; Schriks M; van Wezel AP
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2019 Jan; 15(1):126-134. PubMed ID: 30144268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect-Based Trigger Values Are Essential for the Uptake of Effect-Based Methods in Water Safety Planning.
    Neale PA; Escher BI; de Baat ML; Enault J; Leusch FDL
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2023 Mar; 42(3):714-726. PubMed ID: 36524849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of a bioanalytical test battery for water quality monitoring: Fingerprinting identified micropollutants and their contribution to effects in surface water.
    Neale PA; Altenburger R; Aït-Aïssa S; Brion F; Busch W; de Aragão Umbuzeiro G; Denison MS; Du Pasquier D; Hilscherová K; Hollert H; Morales DA; Novák J; Schlichting R; Seiler TB; Serra H; Shao Y; Tindall AJ; Tollefsen KE; Williams TD; Escher BI
    Water Res; 2017 Oct; 123():734-750. PubMed ID: 28728110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mixture effects in samples of multiple contaminants - An inter-laboratory study with manifold bioassays.
    Altenburger R; Scholze M; Busch W; Escher BI; Jakobs G; Krauss M; Krüger J; Neale PA; Ait-Aissa S; Almeida AC; Seiler TB; Brion F; Hilscherová K; Hollert H; Novák J; Schlichting R; Serra H; Shao Y; Tindall A; Tollefsen KE; Umbuzeiro G; Williams TD; Kortenkamp A
    Environ Int; 2018 May; 114():95-106. PubMed ID: 29499452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mixture effects of organic micropollutants present in water: towards the development of effect-based water quality trigger values for baseline toxicity.
    Tang JY; McCarty S; Glenn E; Neale PA; Warne MS; Escher BI
    Water Res; 2013 Jun; 47(10):3300-14. PubMed ID: 23618317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect-based tools for monitoring estrogenic mixtures: Evaluation of five in vitro bioassays.
    Kunz PY; Simon E; Creusot N; Jayasinghe BS; Kienle C; Maletz S; Schifferli A; Schönlau C; Aït-Aïssa S; Denslow ND; Hollert H; Werner I; Vermeirssen ELM
    Water Res; 2017 Mar; 110():378-388. PubMed ID: 27836174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bioassay battery interlaboratory investigation of emerging contaminants in spiked water extracts - Towards the implementation of bioanalytical monitoring tools in water quality assessment and monitoring.
    Di Paolo C; Ottermanns R; Keiter S; Ait-Aissa S; Bluhm K; Brack W; Breitholtz M; Buchinger S; Carere M; Chalon C; Cousin X; Dulio V; Escher BI; Hamers T; Hilscherová K; Jarque S; Jonas A; Maillot-Marechal E; Marneffe Y; Nguyen MT; Pandard P; Schifferli A; Schulze T; Seidensticker S; Seiler TB; Tang J; van der Oost R; Vermeirssen E; Zounková R; Zwart N; Hollert H
    Water Res; 2016 Nov; 104():473-484. PubMed ID: 27585427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of a framework to derive effect-based trigger values to interpret CALUX data for drinking water quality.
    Been F; Pronk T; Louisse J; Houtman C; van der Velden-Slootweg T; van der Oost R; Dingemans MML
    Water Res; 2021 Apr; 193():116859. PubMed ID: 33540341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endocrine disrupting chemicals entering European rivers: Occurrence and adverse mixture effects in treated wastewater.
    Finckh S; Buchinger S; Escher BI; Hollert H; König M; Krauss M; Leekitratanapisan W; Schiwy S; Schlichting R; Shuliakevich A; Brack W
    Environ Int; 2022 Dec; 170():107608. PubMed ID: 36343551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the use of the partitioning approach to derive Environmental Quality Standards (EQS) for persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in sediments: a review of existing data.
    Dueri S; Castro-Jiménez J; Comenges JM
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Sep; 403(1-3):23-33. PubMed ID: 18572224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. SIMONI (smart integrated monitoring) as a novel bioanalytical strategy for water quality assessment: Part i-model design and effect-based trigger values.
    van der Oost R; Sileno G; Suárez-Muñoz M; Nguyen MT; Besselink H; Brouwer A
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2017 Sep; 36(9):2385-2399. PubMed ID: 28470755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Future water quality monitoring--adapting tools to deal with mixtures of pollutants in water resource management.
    Altenburger R; Ait-Aissa S; Antczak P; Backhaus T; Barceló D; Seiler TB; Brion F; Busch W; Chipman K; de Alda ML; de Aragão Umbuzeiro G; Escher BI; Falciani F; Faust M; Focks A; Hilscherova K; Hollender J; Hollert H; Jäger F; Jahnke A; Kortenkamp A; Krauss M; Lemkine GF; Munthe J; Neumann S; Schymanski EL; Scrimshaw M; Segner H; Slobodnik J; Smedes F; Kughathas S; Teodorovic I; Tindall AJ; Tollefsen KE; Walz KH; Williams TD; Van den Brink PJ; van Gils J; Vrana B; Zhang X; Brack W
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Apr; 512-513():540-551. PubMed ID: 25644849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new risk assessment approach for the prioritization of 500 classical and emerging organic microcontaminants as potential river basin specific pollutants under the European Water Framework Directive.
    von der Ohe PC; Dulio V; Slobodnik J; De Deckere E; Kühne R; Ebert RU; Ginebreda A; De Cooman W; Schüürmann G; Brack W
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 May; 409(11):2064-77. PubMed ID: 21414651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Delivering environmental benefit from the use of Environmental Quality Standards: why we need to focus on implementation.
    Merrington G; Peters A; Whitehouse P; Clarke R; Merckel D
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Feb; 25(4):3053-3059. PubMed ID: 28432624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Deriving environmental quality standards in European surface waters: when are there too few data?
    Merrington G; Van Sprang P
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2014 Jan; 21(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 23589253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Environmental quality standards for water framework directive priority substances: challenges and opportunities.
    Crane M; Babut M
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2007 Apr; 3(2):290-6. PubMed ID: 17477297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bioassay predictive values for chemical health risks in drinking water.
    Pronk TE; Hoondert RPJ; Kools SAE; Kumar V; de Baat ML
    Environ Int; 2024 Jun; 188():108733. PubMed ID: 38744044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.