322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29454444)
1. Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy: is the incidence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula comparable to that after open pancreatoduodenectomy?
Kantor O; Pitt HA; Talamonti MS; Roggin KK; Bentrem DJ; Prinz RA; Baker MS
Surgery; 2018 Mar; 163(3):587-593. PubMed ID: 29454444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Robotic vs Open Pancreatoduodenectomy on Incidence of Pancreatic Fistula.
McMillan MT; Zureikat AH; Hogg ME; Kowalsky SJ; Zeh HJ; Sprys MH; Vollmer CM
JAMA Surg; 2017 Apr; 152(4):327-335. PubMed ID: 28030724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perioperative and oncologic outcome of robot-assisted minimally invasive (hybrid laparoscopic and robotic) pancreatoduodenectomy: based on pancreatic fistula risk score and cancer/staging matched comparison with open pancreatoduodenectomy.
Kim HS; Kim H; Kwon W; Han Y; Byun Y; Kang JS; Choi YJ; Jang JY
Surg Endosc; 2021 Apr; 35(4):1675-1681. PubMed ID: 32277354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis based on factors predictive of postoperative pancreatic fistula.
Napoli N; Kauffmann EF; Menonna F; Costa F; Iacopi S; Amorese G; Giorgi S; Baggiani A; Boggi U
Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1234-1247. PubMed ID: 28812160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Is Associated with Decreased Clinically Relevant Pancreatic Fistulas: a Propensity-Matched Analysis.
Cai J; Ramanathan R; Zenati MS; Al Abbas A; Hogg ME; Zeh HJ; Zureikat AH
J Gastrointest Surg; 2020 May; 24(5):1111-1118. PubMed ID: 31267434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Updated Alternative Fistula Risk Score (ua-FRS) to Include Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy: Pan-European Validation.
Mungroop TH; Klompmaker S; Wellner UF; Steyerberg EW; Coratti A; D'Hondt M; de Pastena M; Dokmak S; Khatkov I; Saint-Marc O; Wittel U; Abu Hilal M; Fuks D; Poves I; Keck T; Boggi U; Besselink MG;
Ann Surg; 2021 Feb; 273(2):334-340. PubMed ID: 30829699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fistula risk score-adjusted comparison of postoperative pancreatic fistula following laparoscopic vs open pancreatoduodenectomy.
Lee B; Yoon YS; Kang CM; Choi M; Lee JS; Hwang HK; Cho JY; Lee WJ; Han HS
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2021 Dec; 28(12):1089-1097. PubMed ID: 33174394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Delayed gastric emptying is associated with increased risk of mortality in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Dominguez OH; Grigorian A; Wolf RF; Imagawa DK; Nahmias JT; Jutric Z
Updates Surg; 2023 Apr; 75(3):523-530. PubMed ID: 36309940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Independent Predictors of Increased Operative Time and Hospital Length of Stay Are Consistent Across Different Surgical Approaches to Pancreatoduodenectomy.
Xourafas D; Pawlik TM; Cloyd JM
J Gastrointest Surg; 2018 Nov; 22(11):1911-1919. PubMed ID: 29943136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. External validation of alternative fistula risk score (a-FRS) for predicting pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy.
Lao M; Zhang X; Guo C; Chen W; Zhang Q; Ma T; Bai X; Liang T
HPB (Oxford); 2020 Jan; 22(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 31272847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing the impact of conversion on outcomes of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy and pancreatoduodenectomy.
Beane JD; Pitt HA; Dolejs SC; Hogg ME; Zeh HJ; Zureikat AH
HPB (Oxford); 2018 Apr; 20(4):356-363. PubMed ID: 29191691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: Is Minimally Invasive Surgery Better than Open? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Petrucciani N; Crovetto A; DE Felice F; Pace M; Giulitti D; Yusef M; Nigri G; Valabrega S; Kassir R; D'Angelo F; Debs T; Ramacciato G; Aurello P
Anticancer Res; 2022 Jul; 42(7):3285-3298. PubMed ID: 35790274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of unplanned conversion to an open procedure during minimally invasive pancreatectomy.
Stiles ZE; Dickson PV; Deneve JL; Glazer ES; Dong L; Wan JY; Behrman SW
J Surg Res; 2018 Jul; 227():168-177. PubMed ID: 29804849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing Short-term and Oncologic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy Across Low and High Volume Centers.
Torphy RJ; Friedman C; Halpern A; Chapman BC; Ahrendt SS; McCarter MM; Edil BH; Schulick RD; Gleisner A
Ann Surg; 2019 Dec; 270(6):1147-1155. PubMed ID: 29771723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Population-Based Assessment of Selective Drain Placement During Pancreatoduodenectomy Using the Modified Fistula Risk Score.
Xourafas D; Ejaz A; Tsung A; Dillhoff M; Pawlik TM; Cloyd JM
J Am Coll Surg; 2019 Apr; 228(4):583-591. PubMed ID: 30586644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive hepatopancreatobiliary surgery in North America: an ACS-NSQIP analysis of predictors of conversion for laparoscopic and robotic pancreatectomy and hepatectomy.
Zureikat AH; Borrebach J; Pitt HA; Mcgill D; Hogg ME; Thompson V; Bentrem DJ; Hall BL; Zeh HJ
HPB (Oxford); 2017 Jul; 19(7):595-602. PubMed ID: 28400087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Antimicrobial Stewardship Reduces Surgical Site Infection Rate, as well as Number and Severity of Pancreatic Fistulae after Pancreatoduodenectomy.
Cengiz TB; Jarrar A; Power C; Joyce D; Anzlovar N; Morris-Stiff G
Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2020 Apr; 21(3):212-217. PubMed ID: 31697194
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Which one is better? Laparoscopic versus robotic reconstruction in the remnant soft pancreas with a small pancreatic duct following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a multicenter study with propensity score matching analysis.
Jang JY; Kang CM; Kim H; Choi M; Lee JH; Choi SH
Surg Endosc; 2023 May; 37(5):4028-4039. PubMed ID: 36097095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours (LEOPARD-2): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial.
van Hilst J; de Rooij T; Bosscha K; Brinkman DJ; van Dieren S; Dijkgraaf MG; Gerhards MF; de Hingh IH; Karsten TM; Lips DJ; Luyer MD; Busch OR; Festen S; Besselink MG;
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Mar; 4(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 30685489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. National Pancreatic Fistula Rates after Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A NSQIP Analysis.
Panni RZ; Guerra J; Hawkins WG; Hall BL; Asbun HJ; Sanford DE
J Am Coll Surg; 2019 Aug; 229(2):192-199.e1. PubMed ID: 30797082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
