These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29454643)

  • 1. Proprioceptive stimuli and habit formation: Interresponse time mediated behavior in CD-1 mice.
    Cleaveland JM; Roselle A; Fischer DK
    Behav Processes; 2018 May; 150():29-35. PubMed ID: 29454643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantifying the molecular structure of behavior: separate effects of caffeine, cocaine, and adenosine agonists on interresponse times and lever-press durations.
    Newland MC
    Behav Pharmacol; 1997 Feb; 8(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 9832996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. IRT-stimulus contingencies in chained schedules: implications for the concept of conditioned reinforcement.
    Bejarano R; Hackenberg TD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2007 Sep; 88(2):215-27. PubMed ID: 17970416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. About bouts: A heterogeneous tandem schedule of reinforcement reveals dissociable components of operant behavior in Fischer rats.
    Daniels CW; Sanabria F
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(3):280-294. PubMed ID: 29120215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interresponse-time sensitivity during discrete-trial and free-operant concurrent variable-interval schedules.
    Cleaveland JM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1999 Nov; 72(3):317-39. PubMed ID: 10605102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The distribution of interresponse times in the pigeon during variable-interval reinforcement.
    Blough PM; Blough DS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 Jan; 11(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 5636852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Probability of response and probability of reinforcement in a response-defined analogue of an interval schedule.
    Millenson JR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1966 Mar; 9(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 5907831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interresponse time changes as a function of water deprivation and amphetamine.
    Brown BM; Seiden LS
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1975 May; 193(2):701-12. PubMed ID: 1142113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preference as a function of active interresponse times: a test of the active time model.
    Misak P; Cleaveland JM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Sep; 96(2):215-25. PubMed ID: 21909165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parametric manipulation of interresponse-time contingency independent of reinforcement rate.
    Galbicka G; Platt JR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1986 Oct; 12(4):371-80. PubMed ID: 3772301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Human instrumental performance in ratio and interval contingencies: A challenge for associative theory.
    Pérez OD; Aitken MR; Zhukovsky P; Soto FA; Urcelay GP; Dickinson A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):311-321. PubMed ID: 27894212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Discriminated interresponse times: role of autoshaped responses.
    Palmer DC; Donahoe JW; Crowley MA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1985 Nov; 44(3):301-13. PubMed ID: 4086973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Longer operant lever-press duration requirements induce fewer but longer response bouts in rats.
    Brackney RJ; Garcia R; Sanabria F
    Learn Behav; 2021 Sep; 49(3):330-342. PubMed ID: 33629243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the primacy of molecular processes in determining response rates under variable-ratio and variable-interval schedules.
    Tanno T; Sakagami T
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 Jan; 89(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 18338672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pausing as an operant: choice and discriminated responding.
    Craig AR; Lattal KA; Hall EG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Mar; 101(2):230-45. PubMed ID: 24436113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Task parameters influence operant response variability in mice.
    Follman EG; Chevée M; Kim CJ; Johnson AR; Tat J; Leonard MZ; Calipari ES
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2023 Jan; 240(1):213-225. PubMed ID: 36572717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The reinforcement of short interresponse times.
    Shimp CP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1967 Sep; 10(5):425-34. PubMed ID: 6050054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Change in the relative contributions of habit and working memory facilitates serial reversal learning expertise in rhesus monkeys.
    Hassett TC; Hampton RR
    Anim Cogn; 2017 May; 20(3):485-497. PubMed ID: 28185097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of contingent auditory stimuli on concurrent schedule performance: an alternative punisher to electric shock.
    Reed P; Yoshino T
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jul; 78(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 18406078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Operant behavior and the galvanic skin potential under DRL schedule.
    Meurice E; Weiner H; Sloboda W
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1966 Mar; 9(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 5907823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.