BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29454846)

  • 1. Comparison of reporting phase III randomized controlled trials of antibiotic treatment for common bacterial infections in ClinicalTrials.gov and matched publications.
    Shepshelovich D; Yelin D; Gafter-Gvili A; Goldman S; Avni T; Yahav D
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2018 Nov; 24(11):1211.e9-1211.e14. PubMed ID: 29454846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of reporting phase I trial results in ClinicalTrials.gov and matched publications.
    Shepshelovich D; Goldvaser H; Wang L; Abdul Razak AR; Bedard PL
    Invest New Drugs; 2017 Dec; 35(6):827-833. PubMed ID: 28905282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is Mandatory Prospective Trial Registration Working to Prevent Publication of Unregistered Trials and Selective Outcome Reporting? An Observational Study of Five Psychiatry Journals That Mandate Prospective Clinical Trial Registration.
    Scott A; Rucklidge JJ; Mulder RT
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0133718. PubMed ID: 26287998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical controversies in clinical research: comparison of primary outcomes in protocols, public clinical-trial registries and publications: the example of oncology trials.
    Perlmutter AS; Tran VT; Dechartres A; Ravaud P
    Ann Oncol; 2017 Apr; 28(4):688-695. PubMed ID: 28011448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do Published Data in Trials Assessing Cancer Drugs Reflect the Real Picture of Efficacy and Safety?
    Lv JW; Chen YP; Zhou GQ; Liu X; Guo Y; Mao YP; Ma J; Sun Y
    J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2017 Nov; 15(11):1363-1371. PubMed ID: 29118228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The fate of prospective spine studies registered on www.ClinicalTrials.gov.
    Ohnmeiss DD
    Spine J; 2015 Mar; 15(3):487-91. PubMed ID: 25315132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trial publication after registration in ClinicalTrials.Gov: a cross-sectional analysis.
    Ross JS; Mulvey GK; Hines EM; Nissen SE; Krumholz HM
    PLoS Med; 2009 Sep; 6(9):e1000144. PubMed ID: 19901971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characteristics of randomised trials on diseases in the digestive system registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: a retrospective analysis.
    Wildt S; Krag A; Gluud L
    BMJ Open; 2011 Jan; 1(2):e000309. PubMed ID: 22080540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Public availability of results of observational studies evaluating an intervention registered at ClinicalTrials.gov.
    Baudart M; Ravaud P; Baron G; Dechartres A; Haneef R; Boutron I
    BMC Med; 2016 Jan; 14():7. PubMed ID: 26819213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between publicly accessible publications, registries, and protocols of phase III trials indicated persistence of selective outcome reporting.
    Zhang S; Liang F; Li W
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Nov; 91():87-94. PubMed ID: 28757260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Timing and completeness of trial results posted at ClinicalTrials.gov and published in journals.
    Riveros C; Dechartres A; Perrodeau E; Haneef R; Boutron I; Ravaud P
    PLoS Med; 2013 Dec; 10(12):e1001566; discussion e1001566. PubMed ID: 24311990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of Consistency Between Peer-Reviewed Publications and Clinical Trial Registries.
    Sun LW; Lee DJ; Collins JA; Carll TC; Ramahi K; Sandy SJ; Unteriner JG; Weinberg DV
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 137(5):552-556. PubMed ID: 30946427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trial registration, publication rate and characteristics in the research field of otology: A cross-sectional study.
    van Heteren JAA; van Beurden I; Peters JPM; Smit AL; Stegeman I
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219458. PubMed ID: 31291350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Empirical evidence for outcome reporting bias in randomized clinical trials of acupuncture: comparison of registered records and subsequent publications.
    Su CX; Han M; Ren J; Li WY; Yue SJ; Hao YF; Liu JP
    Trials; 2015 Jan; 16():28. PubMed ID: 25626862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of serious adverse events posted at ClinicalTrials.gov and published in corresponding journal articles.
    Tang E; Ravaud P; Riveros C; Perrodeau E; Dechartres A
    BMC Med; 2015 Aug; 13():189. PubMed ID: 26269118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of arthroplasty trial publications after registration in ClinicalTrials.gov.
    Smith HN; Bhandari M; Mahomed NN; Jan M; Gandhi R
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Aug; 27(7):1283-8. PubMed ID: 22226609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Publication status of contemporary oncology randomised controlled trials worldwide.
    Chen YP; Liu X; Lv JW; Li WF; Zhang Y; Guo Y; Lin AH; Sun Y; Mao YP; Ma J
    Eur J Cancer; 2016 Oct; 66():17-25. PubMed ID: 27522246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reporting of the safety from allergic rhinitis trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and in publications: An observational study.
    Paladin I; Pranić SM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Oct; 22(1):262. PubMed ID: 36199040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes to registration elements and results in a cohort of Clinicaltrials.gov trials were not reflected in published articles.
    Pranić S; Marušić A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():26-37. PubMed ID: 26226103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reporting discrepancies between the ClinicalTrials.gov results database and peer-reviewed publications.
    Hartung DM; Zarin DA; Guise JM; McDonagh M; Paynter R; Helfand M
    Ann Intern Med; 2014 Apr; 160(7):477-83. PubMed ID: 24687070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.