141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29455000)
21. Higher risk for adverse obstetric outcomes among immigrants of African and Asian descent: a comparison study at a low-risk maternity hospital in Norway.
Bakken KS; Skjeldal OH; Stray-Pedersen B
Birth; 2015 Jun; 42(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 25847218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Maternal and perinatal consequences of antepartum haemorrhage of unknown origin.
Bhandari S; Raja EA; Shetty A; Bhattacharya S
BJOG; 2014 Jan; 121(1):44-50; discussion 50-2. PubMed ID: 24125550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Breech delivery and foetal outcome: a review of 291 cases.
Mekbib TA
Ethiop Med J; 1995 Jul; 33(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 7588656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Planned home and hospital births in South Australia, 1991-2006: differences in outcomes.
Kennare RM; Keirse MJ; Tucker GR; Chan AC
Med J Aust; 2010 Jan; 192(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 20078406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Macrosomia: mode of delivery and pregnancy outcome.
Bjørstad AR; Irgens-Hansen K; Daltveit AK; Irgens LM
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 May; 89(5):664-9. PubMed ID: 20235897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Influence of Fetal Birth Weight on Caesarean Section Rate and Fetal Outcome After Induction of Labor.
Temerinac D; Chen XI; Sütterlin M; Kehl S
In Vivo; 2015; 29(5):519-24. PubMed ID: 26359408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Obstetric interventions for low-risk pregnant women in France: do maternity unit characteristics make a difference?
Coulm B; Le Ray C; Lelong N; Drewniak N; Zeitlin J; Blondel B
Birth; 2012 Sep; 39(3):183-91. PubMed ID: 23281900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Maternal and neonatal outcome in pregnant women undergone induction of labor at Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.
Jaiswal S; Kyejo W; Kilewo C
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2024 May; 24(1):387. PubMed ID: 38789941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Outcomes of term vaginal breech delivery.
Doyle NM; Riggs JW; Ramin SM; Sosa MA; Gilstrap LC
Am J Perinatol; 2005 Aug; 22(6):325-8. PubMed ID: 16118722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Is time of birth a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome? A hospital-based cross-sectional study in a low-resource setting, Tanzania.
Mgaya A; Hinju J; Kidanto H
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jun; 17(1):184. PubMed ID: 28606111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The association between persistent occiput posterior position and neonatal outcomes.
Cheng YW; Shaffer BL; Caughey AB
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 107(4):837-44. PubMed ID: 16582120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Twin births: cesarean section or vaginal delivery?
Hoffmann E; Oldenburg A; Rode L; Tabor A; Rasmussen S; Skibsted L
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Apr; 91(4):463-9. PubMed ID: 22432546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of teenage pregnancies in Thailand.
Thaithae S; Thato R
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2011 Dec; 24(6):342-6. PubMed ID: 22099731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Do all hospitals need cesarean delivery capability? An outcomes study of maternity care in a rural hospital without on-site cesarean capability.
Leeman L; Leeman R
J Fam Pract; 2002 Feb; 51(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 11978210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Maternal and neonatal consequences induced by the French recommendations for episiotomy practice. Monocentric study about 5409 vaginal deliveries].
Koskas M; Caillod AL; Fauconnier A; Bader G
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2009 Sep; 37(9):697-702. PubMed ID: 19682940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Grand multiparity and the possible risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes: a dilemma to be deciphered.
Al-Shaikh GK; Ibrahim GH; Fayed AA; Al-Mandeel H
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Sep; 17(1):310. PubMed ID: 28927391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A retrospective comparison of water births and conventional vaginal deliveries.
Otigbah CM; Dhanjal MK; Harmsworth G; Chard T
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2000 Jul; 91(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 10817872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Duration of the second stage of labor in multiparous women: maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Cheng YW; Hopkins LM; Laros RK; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 196(6):585.e1-6. PubMed ID: 17547906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Association between obstetrician forceps volume and maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Miller ES; Barber EL; McDonald KD; Gossett DR
Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Feb; 123(2 Pt 1):248-254. PubMed ID: 24402600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluating the impact of the laborist model of obstetric care on maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Srinivas SK; Small DS; Macheras M; Hsu JY; Caldwell D; Lorch S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 215(6):770.e1-770.e9. PubMed ID: 27530491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
