BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29455347)

  • 21. [Mid- and long-term effectiveness and failure causes analysis of large-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty].
    Li J; Zhou K; Chen Z; Wang D; Zhou Z; Kang P; Shen B; Yang J; Pei F
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 31(2):144-149. PubMed ID: 29786243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Are Females at Greater Risk for Revision Surgery After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty With the Articular Surface Replacement Prosthesis?
    Donahue GS; Lindgren V; Galea VP; Madanat R; Muratoglu O; Malchau H
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2257-65. PubMed ID: 27121872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Higher Prevalence of Mixed or Solid Pseudotumors in Metal-on-Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty Compared With Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty and Resurfacing Hip Arthroplasty.
    Hjorth MH; Mechlenburg I; Soballe K; Roemer L; Jakobsen SS; Stilling M
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jul; 33(7):2279-2286. PubMed ID: 29526334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Revisions of Modular Metal-on-metal THA Have a High Risk of Early Complications.
    Jennings JM; White S; Martin JR; Yang CC; Miner TM; Dennis DA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Feb; 477(2):344-350. PubMed ID: 30794222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision.
    Matharu GS; Pandit HG; Murray DW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):304-314. PubMed ID: 27188835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Short and mid-term outcomes and functional results in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty at 5 years follow-up: the Spanish experience.
    Pérez-Moro OS; Fernández-Cuadros ME; Neira-Borrajo I; Aranda-Izquierdo E; Albaladejo-Florin MJ; Llopis-Miró R
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Apr; 20(1):172. PubMed ID: 30992064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Same survival but higher rate of osteolysis for metal-on-metal Ultamet versus ceramic-on-ceramic in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty after 8 years of follow-up.
    Higuchi Y; Seki T; Takegami Y; Komatsu D; Morita D; Ishiguro N
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Dec; 104(8):1155-1161. PubMed ID: 30269967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. MRI findings, metal ion levels and clinical outcome of a complete series of large metal on metal THA: what's really going on?
    Marchica D; Gallazzi E; Materazzi G; Battaglia GA; Zagra L
    Hip Int; 2018 Nov; 28(2_suppl):48-53. PubMed ID: 30755111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared with 28-mm diameter metal-on-metal total hip replacement: a randomised study with six to nine years' follow-up.
    Vendittoli PA; Rivière C; Roy AG; Barry J; Lusignan D; Lavigne M
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Nov; 95-B(11):1464-73. PubMed ID: 24151264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Catastrophic failure of femoral stem modular junction when combined with metal-on-metal bearing in comparison to ceramic-on-ceramic: A retrospective cohort study.
    Beauchamp JE; Vendittoli PA; Barry J; Pelet S; Belzile EL
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2021 Feb; 107(1):102749. PubMed ID: 33316446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The use of dual mobility cups in revision total hip arthroplasty for failed large head metal-on-metal bearings.
    Meriem S; Antoniadis A; Palazzuolo M; Wegrzyn J
    Int Orthop; 2024 Mar; 48(3):719-727. PubMed ID: 37907694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. What Is the Natural History of Asymptomatic Pseudotumors in Metal-on-metal THAs at Mid-term Followup?
    Konan S; Duncan CP; Masri BS; Garbuz DS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):433-441. PubMed ID: 27444034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Adverse Tissue Reactions and Metal Ion Behavior After Small-Head Metasul Hip Arthroplasty: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study.
    Ishida T; Tateiwa T; Takahashi Y; Nishikawa Y; Shishido T; Masaoka T; Yamamoto K
    Orthop Surg; 2022 Feb; 14(2):264-273. PubMed ID: 34910382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reducing the failure rate of hip resurfacing in dysplasia patients: a retrospective analysis of 363 cases.
    Gaillard MD; Gross TP
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jun; 17():251. PubMed ID: 27267594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of Complications Following Revision of Metal-on-Metal Versus Metal-on-Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Nishio S; Fukunishi S; Yoshiya S; Sing DC; Hansen EN; Vail TP
    Orthopedics; 2017 Jan; 40(1):e164-e169. PubMed ID: 27783837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Despite higher revision rate, MoM large-head THA offers better clinical scores than HR: 14-year results from a randomized controlled trial involving 48 patients.
    Kostretzis L; Lavigne M; Kiss MO; Shahin M; Barry J; Vendittoli PA
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Apr; 22(1):400. PubMed ID: 33941155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Physical Activity Is Associated With the Level of Chromium but Not With Changes in Pseudotumor Size in Patients With Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty.
    Hjorth MH; Mechlenburg I; Soballe K; Jakobsen SS; Roemer L; Stilling M
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Sep; 33(9):2932-2939. PubMed ID: 29807790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Crowe Type I and II DDH managed by large diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.
    Yalcin N; Kilicarslan K; Cicek H; Kayaalp C; Yildirim H
    Hip Int; 2011; 21(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 21484734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Incidence of Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris From 28-mm Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasties With Minimum 10 Years of Follow-Up: Clinical, Laboratory, and Ultrasound Assessment of 44 Cases.
    Ayoub B; Putman S; Cholewinski P; Paris A; Migaud H; Girard J
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Apr; 32(4):1206-1210. PubMed ID: 27988181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Adverse reaction to metal debris after Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Junnila M; Seppänen M; Mokka J; Virolainen P; Pölönen T; Vahlberg T; Mattila K; Tuominen EK; Rantakokko J; Äärimaa V; Itälä A; Mäkelä KT
    Acta Orthop; 2015 Jun; 86(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 25582189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 57.