These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29456288)

  • 1. Distributional learning of subcategories in an artificial grammar: Category generalization and subcategory restrictions.
    Reeder PA; Newport EL; Aslin RN
    J Mem Lang; 2017 Dec; 97():17-29. PubMed ID: 29456288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. From shared contexts to syntactic categories: the role of distributional information in learning linguistic form-classes.
    Reeder PA; Newport EL; Aslin RN
    Cogn Psychol; 2013 Feb; 66(1):30-54. PubMed ID: 23089290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Word categorization from distributional information: frames confer more than the sum of their (Bigram) parts.
    Mintz TH; Wang FH; Li J
    Cogn Psychol; 2014 Dec; 75():1-27. PubMed ID: 25164244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distributional Language Learning: Mechanisms and Models of ategory Formation.
    Aslin RN; Newport EL
    Lang Learn; 2014 Sep; 64(Suppl 2):86-105. PubMed ID: 26855443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of Zipfian frequency variations on category formation in adult artificial language learning.
    Schuler KD; Reeder PA; Newport EL; Aslin RN
    Lang Learn Dev; 2017; 13(4):357-374. PubMed ID: 30405323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Infants can use distributional cues to form syntactic categories.
    Gerken L; Wilson R; Lewis W
    J Child Lang; 2005 May; 32(2):249-68. PubMed ID: 16045250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lexical distributional cues, but not situational cues, are readily used to learn abstract locative verb-structure associations.
    Twomey KE; Chang F; Ambridge B
    Cognition; 2016 Aug; 153():124-39. PubMed ID: 27183399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Category induction from distributional cues in an artificial language.
    Mintz TH
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jul; 30(5):678-86. PubMed ID: 12219885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acquiring and processing verb argument structure: distributional learning in a miniature language.
    Wonnacott E; Newport EL; Tanenhaus MK
    Cogn Psychol; 2008 May; 56(3):165-209. PubMed ID: 17662707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Input Variability Facilitates Unguided Subcategory Learning in Adults.
    Eidsvåg SS; Austad M; Plante E; Asbjørnsen AE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 58(3):826-39. PubMed ID: 25680081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distributional learning aids linguistic category formation in school-age children.
    Hall J; Owen VAN Horne A; Farmer T
    J Child Lang; 2018 May; 45(3):717-735. PubMed ID: 29125090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What's in the input? Frequent frames in child-directed speech offer distributional cues to grammatical categories in Spanish and English.
    Weisleder A; Waxman SR
    J Child Lang; 2010 Nov; 37(5):1089-108. PubMed ID: 19698207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Semantic Coherence Facilitates Distributional Learning.
    Ouyang L; Boroditsky L; Frank MC
    Cogn Sci; 2017 Apr; 41 Suppl 4():855-884. PubMed ID: 26988338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The differential role of phonological and distributional cues in grammatical categorisation.
    Monaghan P; Chater N; Christiansen MH
    Cognition; 2005 Jun; 96(2):143-82. PubMed ID: 15925574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early grammar-building in French-speaking deaf children with cochlear implants: A follow-up corpus study.
    Le Normand MT; Thai-Van H
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2023; 58(4):1204-1222. PubMed ID: 36740971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Granularity and the acquisition of grammatical gender: how order-of-acquisition affects what gets learned.
    Arnon I; Ramscar M
    Cognition; 2012 Mar; 122(3):292-305. PubMed ID: 22169657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Revise and resubmit: how real-time parsing limitations influence grammar acquisition.
    Pozzan L; Trueswell JC
    Cogn Psychol; 2015 Aug; 80():73-108. PubMed ID: 26026607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The phonological-distributional coherence hypothesis: cross-linguistic evidence in language acquisition.
    Monaghan P; Christiansen MH; Chater N
    Cogn Psychol; 2007 Dec; 55(4):259-305. PubMed ID: 17291481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distributional structure in language: contributions to noun-verb difficulty differences in infant word recognition.
    Willits JA; Seidenberg MS; Saffran JR
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):429-36. PubMed ID: 24908342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Revisiting Masculine and Feminine Grammatical Gender in Spanish: Linguistic, Psycholinguistic, and Neurolinguistic Evidence.
    Beatty-Martínez AL; Dussias PE
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():751. PubMed ID: 31024394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.