These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29456772)

  • 1. Multidimensional Analysis of Curved Root Canal Preparation Using Continuous or Reciprocating Nickel-titanium Instruments.
    Mamede-Neto I; Borges ÁH; Alencar AHG; Duarte MAH; Sousa Neto MD; Estrela C
    Open Dent J; 2018; 12():32-45. PubMed ID: 29456772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative Evaluation of Root Canal Centering Ability of ProTaper, Mtwo, WaveOne, and Reciproc Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography:
    Remya M; Singh P; Varughese A; Joseph A; Chandran P; Subramanian D; Kumar SV
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Sep; 23(6):589-592. PubMed ID: 36259296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Root Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments in Mandibular Premolars Assessed Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
    Mamede-Neto I; Borges AH; Guedes OA; de Oliveira D; Pedro FL; Estrela C
    Open Dent J; 2017; 11():71-78. PubMed ID: 28357000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A micro-computed tomography-based comparison of the canal transportation and centering ability of ProTaper Universal rotary and WaveOne reciprocating files.
    McRay B; Cox TC; Cohenca N; Johnson JD; Paranjpe A
    Quintessence Int; 2014 Feb; 45(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 24389561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cone-beam computed tomographic analysis of apical transportation and centering ratio of ProTaper and XP-endo Shaper NiTi rotary systems in curved canals: an in vitro study.
    Karkehabadi H; Siahvashi Z; Shokri A; Haji Hasani N
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 May; 21(1):277. PubMed ID: 34034735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.
    Capar ID; Ertas H; Ok E; Arslan H; Ertas ET
    J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):852-6. PubMed ID: 24862716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of Single-file Systems.
    Hasheminia SM; Farhad A; Sheikhi M; Soltani P; Hendi SS; Ahmadi M
    J Endod; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1788-1791. PubMed ID: 30390970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Comparison of Apical Transportation in Severely Curved Canals Induced by Reciproc and BioRaCe Systems.
    Nabavizadeh M; Abbaszadegan A; Khojastepour L; Amirhosseini M; Kiani E
    Iran Endod J; 2014; 9(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 24688580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of canal transportation instrumented by different kinematics rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
    Gergi R; Arbab-Chirani R; Osta N; Naaman A
    J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1223-7. PubMed ID: 25069937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Centering and transportation: in vitro evaluation of continuous and reciprocating systems in curved root canals.
    Navós BV; Hoppe CB; Mestieri LB; Böttcher DE; Só MV; Grecca FS
    J Conserv Dent; 2016; 19(5):478-81. PubMed ID: 27656071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
    Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative Evaluation of Canal-shaping Abilities of RaceEvo, R-Motion, Reciproc Blue, and ProTaper Gold NiTi Rotary File Systems: A CBCT Study.
    Mustafa M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Dec; 22(12):1406-1412. PubMed ID: 35656678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal retreatment with several NiTi systems.
    Dincer AN; Er O; Canakci BC
    Int Endod J; 2015 Dec; 48(12):1194-8. PubMed ID: 25557631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of Different Glide Path Files on Apical Debris Extrusion in Curved Root Canals.
    Gunes B; Yesildal Yeter K
    J Endod; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1191-1194. PubMed ID: 29884338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shaping ability of BioRace, ProTaper NEXT and Genius nickel-titanium instruments in curved canals of mandibular molars: a MicroCT study.
    Drukteinis S; Peciuliene V; Dummer PMH; Hupp J
    Int Endod J; 2019 Jan; 52(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 29858500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Assessment of Canal Centering Ability and Transportation after Preparation with Twisted File and Bio RaCe Instrumentation.
    Honardar K; Assadian H; Shahab S; Jafari Z; Kazemi A; Nazarimoghaddam K; Kharrazifard MJ; Labbaf H
    J Dent (Tehran); 2014 Jul; 11(4):440-6. PubMed ID: 25584056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shaping ability of two nickel-titanium instruments activated by continuous rotation or adaptive motion: a micro-computed tomography study.
    Pedullà E; Plotino G; Grande NM; Avarotti G; Gambarini G; Rapisarda E; Mannocci F
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Nov; 20(8):2227-2233. PubMed ID: 26876735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shaping ability of the conventional nickel-titanium and reciprocating nickel-titanium file systems: a comparative study using micro-computed tomography.
    Hwang YH; Bae KS; Baek SH; Kum KY; Lee W; Shon WJ; Chang SW
    J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1186-9. PubMed ID: 25069930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transportation and Centering Ability of Neoniti and ProTaper Instruments; A CBCT Assessment.
    Madani Z; Soleymani A; Bagheri T; Moudi E; Bijani A; Rakhshan V
    Iran Endod J; 2017; 12(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 28179923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Comparative SEM Investigation of Smear Layer Remaining on Dentinal Walls by Three Rotary NiTi Files with Different Cross Sectional Designs in Moderately Curved Canals.
    Sharma G; Kakkar P; Vats A
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Mar; 9(3):ZC43-7. PubMed ID: 25954704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.