314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29457192)
1. Influence of orthodontic appliance-derived artifacts on 3-T MRI movies.
Ozawa E; Honda EI; Parakonthun KN; Ohmori H; Shimazaki K; Kurabayashi T; Ono T
Prog Orthod; 2018 Feb; 19(1):7. PubMed ID: 29457192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of orthodontic appliances on the quality of craniofacial anatomical magnetic resonance imaging and real-time speech imaging.
Wylezinska M; Pinkstone M; Hay N; Scott AD; Birch MJ; Miquel ME
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Dec; 37(6):610-7. PubMed ID: 25667040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MRI compatibility of orthodontic brackets and wires: systematic review article.
Dobai A; Dembrovszky F; Vízkelety T; Barsi P; Juhász F; Dobó-Nagy C
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Jul; 22(1):298. PubMed ID: 35854295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Induced magnetic moment in stainless steel components of orthodontic appliances in 1.5 T MRI scanners.
Wang ZJ; Rollins NK; Liang H; Park YJ
Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5871-8. PubMed ID: 26429261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of orthodontic appliances on the diagnostic quality of magnetic resonance images of the head.
Zhylich D; Krishnan P; Muthusami P; Rayner T; Shroff M; Doria A; Tompson B; Lou W; Suri S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Mar; 151(3):484-499. PubMed ID: 28257733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts and fixed orthodontic attachments.
Beau A; Bossard D; Gebeile-Chauty S
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 24997025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictability of magnetic susceptibility artifacts from metallic orthodontic appliances in magnetic resonance imaging.
Blankenstein F; Truong BT; Thomas A; Thieme N; Zachriat C
J Orofac Orthop; 2015 Jan; 76(1):14-29. PubMed ID: 25420942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts and fixed orthodontic attachments].
Beau A; Bossard D; Gebeile-Chauty S
Orthod Fr; 2017 Jun; 88(2):131-138. PubMed ID: 28597834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of orthodontic appliances on the diagnostic capability of magnetic resonance imaging in the head and neck region: A systematic review.
Hasanin M; Kaplan SEF; Hohlen B; Lai C; Nagshabandi R; Zhu X; Al-Jewair T
Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):403-414. PubMed ID: 31285157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Its Effects on Metallic Brackets and Wires: Does It Alter the Temperature and Bonding Efficacy of Orthodontic Devices?
Sfondrini MF; Preda L; Calliada F; Carbone L; Lungarotti L; Bernardinelli L; Gandini P; Scribante A
Materials (Basel); 2019 Nov; 12(23):. PubMed ID: 31801202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MRI with intraoral orthodontic appliance-a comparative in vitro and in vivo study of image artefacts at 1.5 T.
Zachriat C; Asbach P; Blankenstein KI; Peroz I; Blankenstein FH
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(6):20140416. PubMed ID: 25734243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The benefits of aesthetic orthodontic brackets in patients requiring multiple MRI scanning.
Harris TM; Faridrad MR; Dickson JA
J Orthod; 2006 Jun; 33(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 16751430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of the temporomandibular joint in patients with orthodontic appliances.
Okano Y; Yamashiro M; Kaneda T; Kasai K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Feb; 95(2):255-63. PubMed ID: 12582369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. FIXED OR REMOVABLE APPLIANCE FOR EARLY ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT OF FUNCTIONAL ANTERIOR CROSSBITE.
Wiedel AP
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2015; (238):10-72. PubMed ID: 26939312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of orthodontic appliance design on employment hiring preferences.
Didier VF; Almeida-Pedrin RR; Pedron Oltramari PV; Freire Fernandes TM; Lima Dos Santos L; Cláudia de Castro Ferreira Conti A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Dec; 156(6):758-766. PubMed ID: 31784009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of orthodontic brackets and permanent retainers on the diagnostic image quality of MRI scans: A preliminary study.
Neela PK; Tatikonda VK; Syed MW; Mamillapalli PK; Sesham VM; Keesara S
Dent Med Probl; 2021; 58(4):499-508. PubMed ID: 34905303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Orthodontic appliances and MR image artefacts: An exploratory in vitro and in vivo study using 1.5-T and 3-T scanners.
Sonesson M; Al-Qabandi F; Månsson S; Abdulraheem S; Bondemark L; Hellén-Halme K
Imaging Sci Dent; 2021 Mar; 51(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 33828963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Artifacts in brain magnetic resonance imaging due to metallic dental objects.
Costa AL; Appenzeller S; Yasuda CL; Pereira FR; Zanardi VA; Cendes F
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2009 Jun; 14(6):E278-82. PubMed ID: 19300375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic permeability as a predictor of the artefact size caused by orthodontic appliances at 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging.
Blankenstein FH; Asbach P; Beuer F; Glienke J; Mayer S; Zachriat C
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jan; 21(1):281-289. PubMed ID: 26984824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ceramic brackets and low friction : A possible synergy in patients requiring multiple MRI scanning.
Camporesi M; Bulhoes Galvão M; Tortamano A; Dominguez GC; Defraia N; Defraia E; Franchi L
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 May; 77(3):214-23. PubMed ID: 27098639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
