170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29457682)
21. Assessing the reliability of ecotoxicological studies: An overview of current needs and approaches.
Moermond C; Beasley A; Breton R; Junghans M; Laskowski R; Solomon K; Zahner H
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):640-651. PubMed ID: 27869364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. How to Evaluate the Quality of Toxicokinetic-Toxicodynamic Models in the Context of Environmental Risk Assessment.
Jager T; Ashauer R
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2018 Sep; 14(5):604-614. PubMed ID: 29573552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Joining the dots between omics and environmental management.
Leung KM
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2018 Mar; 14(2):169-173. PubMed ID: 29171160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Ecological Recovery and Resilience in Environmental Risk Assessments at the European Food Safety Authority.
Brock T; Bigler F; Frampton G; Hogstrand C; Luttik R; Martin-Laurent F; Topping CJ; van der Werf W; Rortais A
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2018 Sep; 14(5):586-591. PubMed ID: 30489025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. New approach to weight-of-evidence assessment of ecotoxicological effects in regulatory decision-making.
Hall AT; Belanger SE; Guiney PD; Galay-Burgos M; Maack G; Stubblefield W; Martin O
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):573-579. PubMed ID: 28383801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. What are the roadblocks to using population models in ecotoxicology studies?
O'Brien AL
Mar Pollut Bull; 2017 Nov; 124(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 28844454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Developing Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCR) for shampoos: The basis for comparable life cycle assessment.
Golsteijn L; Lessard L; Campion JF; Capelli A; D'Enfert V; King H; Kremer J; Krugman M; Orliac H; Furnemont SR; Schuh W; Stalmans M; O'Hanlon NW; Coroama M
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2018 Sep; 14(5):649-659. PubMed ID: 29870121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Bayesian Networks in Environmental Risk Assessment: A Review.
Kaikkonen L; Parviainen T; Rahikainen M; Uusitalo L; Lehikoinen A
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2021 Jan; 17(1):62-78. PubMed ID: 32841493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. How to use mechanistic effect models in environmental risk assessment of pesticides: Case studies and recommendations from the SETAC workshop MODELINK.
Hommen U; Forbes V; Grimm V; Preuss TG; Thorbek P; Ducrot V
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2016 Jan; 12(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 26437629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Understanding the Science Surrounding Environmental Consequences and Rehabilitation Actions Stemming from Brazil's Fundão Tailing Dam Rupture.
Smith REW; Val AL
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2020 Sep; 16(5):569-571. PubMed ID: 32691915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The Nexus between ecological risk assessment and natural resource damage assessment under CERCLA: introduction to a Society of Environmental Toxicology and ChemistryTechnical Workshop.
Stahl RG; Gouguet R; Charters D; Clements W; Gala W; Haddad R; Helm R; Landis W; Maki A; Munns WR; Young D
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Oct; 5(4):496-9. PubMed ID: 19545185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Challenges in assigning endocrine-specific modes of action: Recommendations for researchers and regulators.
Mihaich EM; Schäfers C; Dreier DA; Hecker M; Ortego L; Kawashima Y; Dang ZC; Solomon K
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Mar; 13(2):280-292. PubMed ID: 27976826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A quantitative screening-level approach to incorporate chemical exposure and risk into alternative assessment evaluations.
Arnold SM; Greggs B; Goyak KO; Landenberger BD; Mason AM; Howard B; Zaleski RT
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Nov; 13(6):1007-1022. PubMed ID: 28294522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Advancing the Omics in aquatic toxicology: SETAC North America 31st Annual Meeting.
Denslow ND; Griffitt RJ; Martyniuk CJ
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2012 Feb; 76(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 22114953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Developing ecological scenarios for the prospective aquatic risk assessment of pesticides.
Rico A; Van den Brink PJ; Gylstra R; Focks A; Brock TC
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2016 Jul; 12(3):510-21. PubMed ID: 26437690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Factors Affecting the Perception of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) in the Ecotoxicology Community.
Mondou M; Hickey GM; Rahman HT; Maguire S; Pain G; Crump D; Hecker M; Basu N
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2020 Mar; 16(2):269-281. PubMed ID: 31944596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. How TK-TD and population models for aquatic macrophytes could support the risk assessment for plant protection products.
Hommen U; Schmitt W; Heine S; Brock TC; Duquesne S; Manson P; Meregalli G; Ochoa-Acuña H; van Vliet P; Arts G
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2016 Jan; 12(1):82-95. PubMed ID: 26420056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prioritization of pharmaceuticals based on risks to aquatic environments in Kazakhstan.
Aubakirova B; Beisenova R; Boxall AB
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Sep; 13(5):832-839. PubMed ID: 28120523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Integrating Exposure and Effect Distributions with the Ecotoxicity Risk Calculator: Case Studies with Crop Protection Products.
Dreier DA; Rodney SI; Moore DR; Grant SL; Chen W; Valenti TW; Brain RA
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2021 Mar; 17(2):321-330. PubMed ID: 32949192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Population-relevant endpoints in the evaluation of endocrine-active substances (EAS) for ecotoxicological hazard and risk assessment.
Marty MS; Blankinship A; Chambers J; Constantine L; Kloas W; Kumar A; Lagadic L; Meador J; Pickford D; Schwarz T; Verslycke T
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Mar; 13(2):317-330. PubMed ID: 28052490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
