286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29458900)
1. Inter-observer variability in fetal biometric measurements.
Kilani R; Aleyadeh W; Atieleh LA; Al Suleimat AM; Khadra M; Hawamdeh HM
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 57(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 29458900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of fetal biometry.
Perni SC; Chervenak FA; Kalish RB; Magherini-Rothe S; Predanic M; Streltzoff J; Skupski DW
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Nov; 24(6):654-8. PubMed ID: 15476300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of maternal body mass index on interobserver variability of fetal ultrasound biometry and amniotic-fluid assessment in late pregnancy.
Martins JG; Kawakita T; Gurganus M; Baraki D; Jain P; Papageorghiou AT; Abuhamad AZ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Dec; 58(6):892-899. PubMed ID: 33836119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Volumetric (3D) imaging reduces inter- and intraobserver variation of fetal biometry measurements.
Chan LW; Fung TY; Leung TY; Sahota DS; Lau TK
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Apr; 33(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 19277977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Expected-value bias in routine third-trimester growth scans.
Drukker L; Droste R; Chatelain P; Noble JA; Papageorghiou AT
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 55(3):375-382. PubMed ID: 31763735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fetal biometry: how well can offline measurements from three-dimensional volumes substitute real-time two-dimensional measurements?
Sarris I; Ohuma E; Ioannou C; Sande J; Altman DG; Papageorghiou AT;
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Nov; 42(5):560-70. PubMed ID: 23335102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fetal biometry by an inexperienced operator using two- and three-dimensional ultrasound.
Yang F; Leung KY; Lee YP; Chan HY; Tang MH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 May; 35(5):566-71. PubMed ID: 20183864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility study of early fetal growth parameters.
Verburg BO; Mulder PG; Hofman A; Jaddoe VW; Witteman JC; Steegers EA
Prenat Diagn; 2008 Apr; 28(4):323-31. PubMed ID: 18324617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality control of ultrasound for fetal biometry: results from the INTERGROWTH-21
Cavallaro A; Ash ST; Napolitano R; Wanyonyi S; Ohuma EO; Molloholli M; Sande J; Sarris I; Ioannou C; Norris T; Donadono V; Carvalho M; Purwar M; Barros FC; Jaffer YA; Bertino E; Pang R; Gravett MG; Salomon LJ; Noble JA; Altman DG; Papageorghiou AT
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Sep; 52(3):332-339. PubMed ID: 28718938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intra- and interobserver variability in fetal ultrasound measurements.
Sarris I; Ioannou C; Chamberlain P; Ohuma E; Roseman F; Hoch L; Altman DG; Papageorghiou AT;
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 39(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 22535628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective assessment of reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound for fetal biometry.
Ambroise Grandjean G; Berveiller P; Hossu G; Noble P; Chamagne M; Morel O
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020; 101(7-8):481-487. PubMed ID: 32241702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Obstetric ultrasound scanning by local health workers in a refugee camp on the Thai-Burmese border.
Rijken MJ; Lee SJ; Boel ME; Papageorghiou AT; Visser GH; Dwell SL; Kennedy SH; Singhasivanon P; White NJ; Nosten F; McGready R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 34(4):395-403. PubMed ID: 19790099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of automated tool for two-dimensional fetal biometry.
Salim I; Cavallaro A; Ciofolo-Veit C; Rouet L; Raynaud C; Mory B; Collet Billon A; Harrison G; Roundhill D; Papageorghiou AT
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 54(5):650-654. PubMed ID: 30478919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fetal biometry in ethnic Chinese: biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length.
Leung TN; Pang MW; Daljit SS; Leung TY; Poon CF; Wong SM; Lau TK
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 31(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 18241086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of focus point for plane acquisition to improve reproducibility in fetal biometry.
Vignola S; Donadono V; Cavalli C; Azzaretto V; Casagrandi D; Pandya P; Napolitano R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Feb; 63(2):237-242. PubMed ID: 37519218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automated ultrasonographic measurement of basic fetal growth parameters.
Pashaj S; Merz E; Petrela E
Ultraschall Med; 2013 Apr; 34(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 23129519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measurement error for ultrasound fetal biometry performed by paramedics in rural Bangladesh.
Neufeld LM; Wagatsuma Y; Hussain R; Begum M; Frongillo EA
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 34(4):387-94. PubMed ID: 19504627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biometry and fetal weight estimation by two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasonography: an intraobserver and interobserver reliability and agreement study.
Lima JC; Miyague AH; Filho FM; Nastri CO; Martins WP
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Aug; 40(2):186-93. PubMed ID: 22102507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of maternal weight on the intra-observer and inter-observer reproducibility of fetal ultrasonography measurements in the third trimester.
Policiano C; Mendes JM; Fonseca A; Barros J; Martins D; Reis I; Clode N; Graça LM
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2018 Jan; 140(1):53-59. PubMed ID: 28960294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. First-Trimester Abdominal Circumference (Versus Crown Rump Length) Improves Precision in Inter- and Intraobserver Variability.
Afshar Y; Gutkin R; Krakow D; Cuckle H; Silverman NS; Platt LD
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Aug; 38(8):2161-2167. PubMed ID: 30593696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
