These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29458906)

  • 1. Comparative cosmetic outcome of surgical incisions created by the PEAK Plasma Blade and a scalpel after cesarean section by Patient and Observer Assessment Scale (POSAS): A randomized double blind study.
    Ekin M; Dagdeviren H; Caypinar SS; Erdogan B; Ayag ME; Cengiz H; Yasar L; Helvacioglu Ç
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 57(1):68-70. PubMed ID: 29458906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomized double-blind trial comparing the cosmetic outcome of cutting diathermy versus scalpel for skin incisions.
    Aird LN; Bristol SG; Phang PT; Raval MJ; Brown CJ
    Br J Surg; 2015 Apr; 102(5):489-94. PubMed ID: 25692789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome in a randomized study of cesarean skin closure.
    Fleisher J; Khalifeh A; Pettker C; Berghella V; Dabbish N; Mackeen AD
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Nov; 32(22):3830-3835. PubMed ID: 29739243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surgical outcome of cutting diathermy versus scalpel skin incisions in uncomplicated appendectomy: A comparative study.
    Okereke CE; Katung AI; Adesunkanmi AK; Alatise OI
    Niger Postgrad Med J; 2019; 26(2):100-105. PubMed ID: 31187749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Suture Closure versus Non-Closure of Subcutaneous Fat and Cosmetic Outcome after Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Husslein H; Gutschi M; Leipold H; Herbst C; Franz M; Worda C
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e114730. PubMed ID: 25494177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cosmetic outcomes of various skin closure methods following cesarean delivery: a randomized trial.
    Cromi A; Ghezzi F; Gottardi A; Cherubino M; Uccella S; Valdatta L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jul; 203(1):36.e1-8. PubMed ID: 20417924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Different ways of subcutaneous tissue and skin closure at cesarean section: a randomized clinical trial on the long-term cosmetic outcome.
    Huppelschoten AG; van Ginderen JC; van den Broek KC; Bouwma AE; Oosterbaan HP
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Aug; 92(8):916-24. PubMed ID: 23530837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fractional CO
    Karmisholt KE; Taudorf EH; Wulff CB; Wenande E; Philipsen PA; Haedersdal M
    Lasers Surg Med; 2017 Feb; 49(2):189-197. PubMed ID: 27862066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The prophylactic use of a topical scar gel containing extract of Allium cepae, allantoin, and heparin improves symptoms and appearance of cesarean-section scars compared with untreated scars.
    Ocampo-Candiani J; Vázquez-Martínez OT; Iglesias Benavides JL; Buske K; Lehn A; Acker C
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2014 Feb; 13(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 24509969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cosmetic outcomes of skin closure with tissue adhesive or staples in repeated cesarean section: A randomized controlled trial.
    Cromi A; Laganà AS; Ghezzi F; Valdatta L; Casarin J; Cherubino M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Apr; 271():112-116. PubMed ID: 35183000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scalpel versus diathermy skin incision in Caesarean section.
    AbdElaal NK; Ellakwa HE; Elhalaby AF; Shaheen AE; Aish AH
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Apr; 39(3):340-344. PubMed ID: 30634889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Bowen double-bladed scalpel for the reconstruction of scars.
    Bowen ML; Charnock FM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Mar; 83(3):476-7. PubMed ID: 8127547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cautery versus scalpel for abdominal skin incisions: a double blind, randomized crossover trial of scar cosmesis.
    Stupart DA; Sim FW; Chan ZH; Guest GD; Watters DA
    ANZ J Surg; 2016 Apr; 86(4):303-6. PubMed ID: 24165306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Post-skin incision scar tissue assessment using patient and observer scar assessment scales: A randomised controlled trial.
    Oley MH; Oley MC; Kepel BJ; Manginstar C; Rawung R; Langi FLFG; Barends D; Aling DMR; Wagiu AMJ; Faruk M
    Ann Med Surg (Lond); 2021 Nov; 71():103006. PubMed ID: 34840756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Techniques for wound closure at caesarean section: a randomized clinical trial.
    de Graaf IM; Oude Rengerink K; Wiersma IC; Donker ME; Mol BW; Pajkrt E
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Nov; 165(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 22910336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Effect of Tranilast 8% Liposomal Gel Versus Placebo on Post-Cesarean Surgical Scars: A Prospective Double-Blind Split-Scar Study.
    Kohavi L; Sprecher E; Zur E; Artzi O
    Dermatol Surg; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1157-1163. PubMed ID: 28825957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Steel scalpel versus electrocautery blade: comparison of cosmetic and patient satisfaction outcomes of different incision methods.
    Chau JK; Dzigielewski P; Mlynarek A; Cote DW; Allen H; Harris JR; Seikaly HR
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Aug; 38(4):427-33. PubMed ID: 19755082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Autologous fat transplantation for the treatment of abdominal wall scar adhesions after cesarean section.
    Li SH; Wu YD; Wu YY; Liao X; Cheung PN; Wan T; Xiao LL; Song JX; Huang HL; Liu HW
    J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2021 Aug; 55(4):210-215. PubMed ID: 33530846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative healing of surgical incisions created by the PEAK PlasmaBlade, conventional electrosurgery, and a scalpel.
    Loh SA; Carlson GA; Chang EI; Huang E; Palanker D; Gurtner GC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Dec; 124(6):1849-1859. PubMed ID: 19952641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictive validity of short term scar quality on final burn scar outcome using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in patients with minor to moderate burn severity.
    Goei H; van der Vlies CH; Tuinebreijer WE; van Zuijlen PPM; Middelkoop E; van Baar ME
    Burns; 2017 Jun; 43(4):715-723. PubMed ID: 28040371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.