These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2945899)

  • 1. The unattended speech effect: perception or memory?
    Baddeley A; Salamé P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1986 Oct; 12(4):525-9. PubMed ID: 2945899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detrimental effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall of visual items are reflected in reduced visual N1 and reduced theta activity.
    Weisz N; Schlittmeier SJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2006 Aug; 16(8):1097-105. PubMed ID: 16221927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Irrelevant sound disrupts speech production: exploring the relationship between short-term memory and experimentally induced slips of the tongue.
    Saito S; Baddeley A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Oct; 57(7):1309-40. PubMed ID: 15513248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bimodal format effects in working memory.
    Goolkasian P; Foos PW
    Am J Psychol; 2005; 118(1):61-77. PubMed ID: 15822610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of Foreign Accent on Immediate Serial Recall.
    Chan KY; Chiu MM; Dailey BA; Jalil DM
    Exp Psychol; 2019 Jan; 66(1):40-57. PubMed ID: 30777508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Properties of memory for unattended spoken syllables.
    Cowan N; Lichty W; Grove TR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Mar; 16(2):258-69. PubMed ID: 2137865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory and temporal factors in the modality effect.
    Crowder RG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1986 Apr; 12(2):268-78. PubMed ID: 2939183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Artificially induced valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall.
    Buchner A; Mehl B; Rothermund K; Wentura D
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1055-62. PubMed ID: 17128604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Disruption of short-term memory by distractor speech: does content matter?
    Bell R; Mund I; Buchner A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jan; 64(1):146-68. PubMed ID: 20544562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In a Concurrent Memory and Auditory Perception Task, the Pupil Dilation Response Is More Sensitive to Memory Load Than to Auditory Stimulus Characteristics.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Rönnberg J; Rudner M
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):272-286. PubMed ID: 29923867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why do participants initiate free recall of short lists of words with the first list item? Toward a general episodic memory explanation.
    Spurgeon J; Ward G; Matthews WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1551-67. PubMed ID: 24933695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Irrelevant speech and serial recall: implications for theories of attention and working memory.
    Jones D; Morris N
    Scand J Psychol; 1992 Sep; 33(3):212-29. PubMed ID: 1488646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Synchronized brain activity during rehearsal and short-term memory disruption by irrelevant speech is affected by recall mode.
    Kopp F; Schröger E; Lipka S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):188-203. PubMed ID: 16298003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Habituation to irrelevant speech: effects on a visual short-term memory task.
    Morris N; Jones DM
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Mar; 47(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 2326151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Influence of attention on an auditory-verbal learning test in schizophrenic patients].
    Huguelet P; Nicastro R; Zanello A
    Encephale; 2002; 28(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 12232538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved segregation of simultaneous talkers differentially affects perceptual and cognitive capacity demands for recognizing speech in competing speech.
    Francis AL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):501-16. PubMed ID: 20139463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inverting the modality effect in serial recall.
    Beaman CP
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):371-89. PubMed ID: 12047050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reduction and elimination of format effects on recall.
    Goolkasian P; Foos PW; Krusemark DC
    Am J Psychol; 2008; 121(3):377-94. PubMed ID: 18792716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual implicit memory requires attentional encoding.
    Crabb BT; Dark VJ
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Mar; 27(2):267-75. PubMed ID: 10226437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory attentional capture during serial recall: violations at encoding of an algorithm-based neural model?
    Hughes RW; Vachon F; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):736-49. PubMed ID: 16060777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.