These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29459059)

  • 1. A brief overview of decommissioning and environmental remediation over the last 20 years.
    Monken-Fernandes H; Michal V
    J Environ Radioact; 2019 Jan; 196():150-152. PubMed ID: 29459059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Applying and adapting the Swedish regulatory system for decommissioning to nuclear power reactors - The regulator's perspective.
    Amft M; Leisvik M; Carroll S
    J Environ Radioact; 2019 Jan; 196():181-186. PubMed ID: 28318653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modelling of nuclear power plant decommissioning financing.
    Bemš J; Knápek J; Králík T; Hejhal M; Kubančák J; Vašíček J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jun; 164(4):519-22. PubMed ID: 25979740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Strategic considerations for the sustainable remediation of nuclear installations.
    Mobbs S; Orr P; Weber I
    J Environ Radioact; 2019 Jan; 196():153-163. PubMed ID: 28789811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Societal constraints related to environmental remediation and decommissioning programmes.
    Perko T; Monken-Fernandes H; Martell M; Zeleznik N; O'Sullivan P
    J Environ Radioact; 2019 Jan; 196():171-180. PubMed ID: 28645583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Decommissioning strategy for liquid low-level radioactive waste surface storage water reservoir.
    Utkin SS; Linge II
    J Environ Radioact; 2019 Jan; 196():164-170. PubMed ID: 27887973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Current significant challenges in the decommissioning and environmental remediation of radioactive facilities: A perspective from outside the nuclear industry.
    Gil-Cerezo V; Domínguez-Vilches E; González-Barrios AJ
    J Environ Radioact; 2017 May; 171():200-211. PubMed ID: 28273600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nuclear power. The trouble with tritium.
    Normile D
    Science; 2014 Dec; 346(6215):1278. PubMed ID: 25504695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Environmental problems associated with decommissioning the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Cooling Pond.
    Oskolkov BY; Bondarkov MD; Gaschak SP; Maksymenko AM; Maksymenko VM; Martynenko VI; Farfán EB; Jannik GT; Marra JC
    Health Phys; 2010 Nov; 99(5):639-48. PubMed ID: 20938234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimisation of the management and regulatory supervision of nuclear decommissioning, legacy sites and radioactively contaminated land.
    Sneve M; Shandala N; Worthington P
    J Radiol Prot; 2021 Aug; 41(3):. PubMed ID: 34426562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk valuation of ecological resources at contaminated deactivation and decommissioning facilities: methodology and a case study at the Department of Energy's Hanford site.
    Burger J; Gochfeld M; Jeitner C
    Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Jul; 190(8):478. PubMed ID: 30030638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Remediation of radiocesium-contaminated liquid waste, soil, and ash: a mini review since the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident.
    Ding D; Zhang Z; Lei Z; Yang Y; Cai T
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Feb; 23(3):2249-63. PubMed ID: 26604196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mobile laboratories: An innovative and efficient solution for radiological characterization of sites under or after decommissioning.
    Goudeau V; Daniel B; Dubot D
    J Environ Radioact; 2019 Jan; 196():194-198. PubMed ID: 28438425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does protecting humans protect the environment? A crude examination for UK nuclear power plants and the marine environment using information in the public domain.
    Brownless GP
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Dec; 28(4):525-38. PubMed ID: 19029588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Topsoil radiological characterisation of L-54M reactor surroundings preliminary to decommissioning operations.
    Mossini E; Codispoti L; Giola M; Castelli L; Macerata E; Porta A; Campi F; Mariani M
    J Environ Radioact; 2019 Jan; 196():187-193. PubMed ID: 29187289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. After Fukushima: managing the consequences of a radiological release.
    Fitzgerald J; Wollner SB; Adalja AA; Morhard R; Cicero A; Inglesby TV
    Biosecur Bioterror; 2012 Jun; 10(2):228-36. PubMed ID: 22578018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. DEVELOPMENT OF DATABASE STRUCTURES AND DATA EXCHANGE PRINCIPLES FOR NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING PLANNING.
    Daniška D; Vrban B; Nečas V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2022 Aug; 198(9-11):740-746. PubMed ID: 36005997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of AN On-site, Rapid, Environmental Radiation-distribution Monitoring System for Decision Making during a Radiation Emergency.
    Lee U; Kim HR
    Health Phys; 2018 Oct; 115(4):422-431. PubMed ID: 30148808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ecosystem-based assessment indices of restoration for Daya Bay near a nuclear power plant in South China.
    Chen X; Gao H; Yao X; Fang H; Chen Z; Xu Z
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Oct; 44(19):7589-95. PubMed ID: 20806960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. AMS assessment of U-contamination of structural materials of the Garigliano NPP under decommissioning.
    Terrasi F; Buompane R; D'Onofrio A; Esposito A; Gialanella L; Marzaioli F; Petraglia A; Porzio G; Sabbarese C; Scolamacchia F; Sirignano C
    J Environ Radioact; 2018 Jul; 187():144-150. PubMed ID: 29402476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.