173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29459256)
1. Evaluation of data quality at the National Cancer Registry of Ukraine.
Ryzhov A; Bray F; Ferlay J; Fedorenko Z; Goulak L; Gorokh Y; Soumkina O; Znaor A
Cancer Epidemiol; 2018 Apr; 53():156-165. PubMed ID: 29459256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Data quality at the Bulgarian National Cancer Registry: An overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness.
Dimitrova N; Parkin DM
Cancer Epidemiol; 2015 Jun; 39(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 25914137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality measures of the population-based Finnish Cancer Registry indicate sound data quality for solid malignant tumours.
Leinonen MK; Miettinen J; Heikkinen S; Pitkäniemi J; Malila N
Eur J Cancer; 2017 May; 77():31-39. PubMed ID: 28350996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Data quality at the Cancer Registry of Norway: an overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness.
Larsen IK; Småstuen M; Johannesen TB; Langmark F; Parkin DM; Bray F; Møller B
Eur J Cancer; 2009 May; 45(7):1218-1231. PubMed ID: 19091545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of Data Quality of Four New Population Based Cancer Registries (PBCRs) in Chandigarh and Punjab, North India- A Quality Control Study.
Bashar MA; Thakur JS; Budukh A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2021 May; 22(5):1421-1433. PubMed ID: 34048170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Data quality at the Singapore Cancer Registry: An overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness.
Fung JW; Lim SB; Zheng H; Ho WY; Lee BG; Chow KY; Lee HP
Cancer Epidemiol; 2016 Aug; 43():76-86. PubMed ID: 27399312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Italian cancer figures, report 2012: Cancer in children and adolescents.
; ;
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(1 Suppl 1):1-225. PubMed ID: 23585445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Italian cancer figures--Report 2015: The burden of rare cancers in Italy.
; Busco S; Buzzoni C; Mallone S; Trama A; Castaing M; Bella F; Amodio R; Bizzoco S; Cassetti T; Cirilli C; Cusimano R; De Angelis R; Fusco M; Gatta G; Gennaro V; Giacomin A; Giorgi Rossi P; Mangone L; Mannino S; Rossi S; Pierannunzio D; Tavilla A; Tognazzo S; Tumino R; Vicentini M; Vitale MF; Crocetti E; Dal Maso L
Epidemiol Prev; 2016; 40(1 Suppl 2):1-120. PubMed ID: 26951748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recent cancer incidence trends in Ukraine and short-term predictions to 2022.
Ryzhov A; Bray F; Ferlay J; Fedorenko Z; Goulak L; Gorokh Y; Soumkina O; Michailovich Y; Znaor A
Cancer Epidemiol; 2020 Apr; 65():101663. PubMed ID: 31882366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Data quality at the Icelandic Cancer Registry: comparability, validity, timeliness and completeness.
Sigurdardottir LG; Jonasson JG; Stefansdottir S; Jonsdottir A; Olafsdottir GH; Olafsdottir EJ; Tryggvadottir L
Acta Oncol; 2012 Sep; 51(7):880-9. PubMed ID: 22974093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Indicators of Data Quality at the Cancer Registry Zurich and Zug in Switzerland.
Wanner M; Matthes KL; Korol D; Dehler S; Rohrmann S
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():7656197. PubMed ID: 30009174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods Part II. Completeness.
Parkin DM; Bray F
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(5):756-64. PubMed ID: 19128954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of data quality at the Hungarian National Cancer Registry, 2000-2019.
Wéber A; Mery L; Nagy P; Polgár C; Bray F; Kenessey I
Cancer Epidemiol; 2023 Feb; 82():102306. PubMed ID: 36521336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality assessment and improvement of cancer registration system in Kamrup Urban District: A report.
Sharma A; Sharma JD; Kataki AC; Barman D; Lahon R; Deka BR; Misra C; Kalita M
Indian J Cancer; 2017; 54(3):560-565. PubMed ID: 29798959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparability, diagnostic validity and completeness of Nigerian cancer registries.
al-Haddad BJ; Jedy-Agba E; Oga E; Ezeome ER; Obiorah CC; Okobia M; Ogunbiyi JO; Ukah CO; Omonisi A; Nwofor AM; Igbinoba F; Adebamowo C
Cancer Epidemiol; 2015 Jun; 39(3):456-64. PubMed ID: 25863982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Lymphomas and leukemias in population-related cancer registries in Germany].
Lehnert M; Baumgardt-Elms C; Stegmaier C; Liese A; Krieg V; Mattauch V; Hense HW
Gesundheitswesen; 1999 Apr; 61(4):161-7. PubMed ID: 10408142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The incidence and mortality of major cancers in China, 2012.
Chen W; Zheng R; Zeng H; Zhang S
Chin J Cancer; 2016 Aug; 35(1):73. PubMed ID: 27484217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods. Part I: comparability, validity and timeliness.
Bray F; Parkin DM
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(5):747-55. PubMed ID: 19117750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry: an overview of completeness, timeliness, comparability and validity.
Moberger P; Sköldberg F; Birgisson H
Acta Oncol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):1611-1621. PubMed ID: 30477372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Completeness and timeliness: Cancer registries could/should improve their performance.
Zanetti R; Schmidtmann I; Sacchetto L; Binder-Foucard F; Bordoni A; Coza D; Ferretti S; Galceran J; Gavin A; Larranaga N; Robinson D; Tryggvadottir L; Van Eycken E; Zadnik V; Coebergh JW; Rosso S
Eur J Cancer; 2015 Jun; 51(9):1091-8. PubMed ID: 24393522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
