These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29460082)
1. Testing Hypotheses on Risk Factors for Scientific Misconduct via Matched-Control Analysis of Papers Containing Problematic Image Duplications. Fanelli D; Costas R; Fang FC; Casadevall A; Bik EM Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Jun; 25(3):771-789. PubMed ID: 29460082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Do individual and institutional predictors of misconduct vary by country? Results of a matched-control analysis of problematic image duplications. Fanelli D; Schleicher M; Fang FC; Casadevall A; Bik EM PLoS One; 2022; 17(3):e0255334. PubMed ID: 35235555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity. Fanelli D; Costas R; Larivière V PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0127556. PubMed ID: 26083381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What Crisis? Management Researchers' Experiences with and Views of Scholarly Misconduct. Hopp C; Hoover GA Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Oct; 25(5):1549-1588. PubMed ID: 30604353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud? Steen RG J Med Ethics; 2011 Feb; 37(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 21081306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving biomedical journals' ethical policies: the case of research misconduct. Bosch X J Med Ethics; 2014 Sep; 40(9):644-6. PubMed ID: 24505117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis and Correction of Inappropriate Image Duplication: the Bik EM; Fang FC; Kullas AL; Davis RJ; Casadevall A Mol Cell Biol; 2018 Oct; 38(20):. PubMed ID: 30037982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific misconduct as a dilemma for nursing. Hawley DJ; Jeffers JM Image J Nurs Sch; 1992; 24(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 1541472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prevalence of scientific misconduct among a group of researchers in Nigeria. Okonta P; Rossouw T Dev World Bioeth; 2013 Dec; 13(3):149-57. PubMed ID: 22994914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: a systematic, retrospective study. Stretton S; Bramich NJ; Keys JR; Monk JA; Ely JA; Haley C; Woolley MJ; Woolley KL Curr Med Res Opin; 2012 Oct; 28(10):1575-83. PubMed ID: 22978774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? Steen RG J Med Ethics; 2011 Apr; 37(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 21186208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ethical aspects in medical publishing in Belgium. Moreels TG Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2018; 81(1):45-48. PubMed ID: 29562377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Research Misconduct in the Croatian Scientific Community: A Survey Assessing the Forms and Characteristics of Research Misconduct. Pupovac V; Prijić-Samaržija S; Petrovečki M Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Feb; 23(1):165-181. PubMed ID: 26940319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Criminalization of scientific misconduct. Bülow W; Helgesson G Med Health Care Philos; 2019 Jun; 22(2):245-252. PubMed ID: 30155851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Scientific Misconduct. Gross C Annu Rev Psychol; 2016; 67():693-711. PubMed ID: 26273897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands. Gopalakrishna G; Ter Riet G; Vink G; Stoop I; Wicherts JM; Bouter LM PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0263023. PubMed ID: 35171921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An international study of research misconduct policies. Resnik DB; Rasmussen LM; Kissling GE Account Res; 2015; 22(5):249-66. PubMed ID: 25928177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]