193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29460101)
1. Pulse-echo ultrasound method for detection of post-menopausal women with osteoporotic BMD.
Karjalainen JP; Riekkinen O; Kröger H
Osteoporos Int; 2018 May; 29(5):1193-1199. PubMed ID: 29460101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New method for point-of-care osteoporosis screening and diagnostics.
Karjalainen JP; Riekkinen O; Töyräs J; Jurvelin JS; Kröger H
Osteoporos Int; 2016 Mar; 27(3):971-977. PubMed ID: 26556741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of hip osteoporosis by DXA using a novel pulse-echo ultrasound device.
Schousboe JT; Riekkinen O; Karjalainen J
Osteoporos Int; 2017 Jan; 28(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 27492435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multi-site bone ultrasound measurements in elderly women with and without previous hip fractures.
Karjalainen JP; Riekkinen O; Töyräs J; Hakulinen M; Kröger H; Rikkonen T; Salovaara K; Jurvelin JS
Osteoporos Int; 2012 Apr; 23(4):1287-95. PubMed ID: 21656263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can the WHO criteria for diagnosing osteoporosis be applied to calcaneal quantitative ultrasound?
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 10928222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can the WHO definition of osteoporosis be applied to multi-site axial transmission quantitative ultrasound?
Knapp KM; Blake GM; Spector TD; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 2004 May; 15(5):367-74. PubMed ID: 14685652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification.
Grampp S; Genant HK; Mathur A; Lang P; Jergas M; Takada M; Glüer CC; Lu Y; Chavez M
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 May; 12(5):697-711. PubMed ID: 9144335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Discrimination of fractures by low-frequency axial transmission ultrasound in postmenopausal females.
Moilanen P; Määttä M; Kilappa V; Xu L; Nicholson PH; Alén M; Timonen J; Jämsä T; Cheng S
Osteoporos Int; 2013 Feb; 24(2):723-30. PubMed ID: 22638711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of low bone mass and prediction of fracture risk using metacarpal radiogrammetry method: a comparative study with DXA and X-ray phantom.
Ashok Kumar D; Anburajan M; Snekhalatha U
Int J Rheum Dis; 2018 Jul; 21(7):1350-1371. PubMed ID: 29968333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproducibility and diagnostic sensitivity of ultrasonometry of the phalanges to assess osteoporosis.
Reginster JY; Dethor M; Pirenne H; Dewe W; Albert A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1998 Oct; 63(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 9849707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interest of a prescreening questionnaire to reduce the cost of bone densitometry.
Ben Sedrine W; Broers P; Devogelaer JP; Depresseux G; Kaufman JM; Goemaere S; Reginster JY
Osteoporos Int; 2002 May; 13(5):434-42. PubMed ID: 12086356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. US Preventative Services Task Force FRAX threshold has a low sensitivity to detect osteoporosis in women ages 50-64 years.
Bansal S; Pecina JL; Merry SP; Kennel KA; Maxson J; Quigg S; Thacher TD
Osteoporos Int; 2015 Apr; 26(4):1429-33. PubMed ID: 25614141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of hip and chest radiographs in osteoporotic evaluation among south Indian women population: a comparative scenario with DXA.
Kumar DA; Anburajan M
J Endocrinol Invest; 2014 May; 37(5):429-40. PubMed ID: 24737214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pulse-echo Ultrasound Identifies Caucasian and Hispanic Women at Risk for Osteoporosis.
Lewiecki EM
J Clin Densitom; 2021; 24(2):175-182. PubMed ID: 32527649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can radial bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound measurements reduce the number of women who need axial density skeletal assessment?
Damilakis J; Papadokostakis G; Perisinakis K; Hadjipavlou A; Gourtsoyiannis N
Osteoporos Int; 2003 Aug; 14(8):688-93. PubMed ID: 12897977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening for osteoporosis using easily obtainable biometrical data: diagnostic accuracy of measured, self-reported and recalled BMI, and related costs of bone mineral density measurements.
van der Voort DJ; Brandon S; Dinant GJ; van Wersch JW
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 10824239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bone mineral density referral for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry using quantitative ultrasound as a prescreening tool in postmenopausal women from the general population: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Marín F; López-Bastida J; Díez-Pérez A; Sacristán JA;
Calcif Tissue Int; 2004 Mar; 74(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 14708042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [OsteoLaus: prediction of osteoporotic fractures by clinical risk factors and DXA, IVA and TBS].
Lamy O; Metzger M; Krieg MA; Aubry-Rozier B; Stoll D; Hans D
Rev Med Suisse; 2011 Nov; 7(315):2130, 2132-4, 2136. PubMed ID: 22187782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of a new quantitative ultrasound calcaneus measurement: precision and discrimination of hip fractures in elderly women compared with dual X-ray absorptiometry.
He YQ; Fan B; Hans D; Li J; Wu CY; Njeh CF; Zhao S; Lu Y; Tsuda-Futami E; Fuerst T; Genant HK
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(4):354-60. PubMed ID: 10928226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultrasound transmission speed and ultrasound bone profile score (UBPS) of the phalanges in normal women and women with osteoporosis.
Soballa T; Wüster C; Schlegel J; Cadossi R; Isani R; Battista S; Heilmann P; Ziegler R
Horm Metab Res; 1998 Aug; 30(8):536-41. PubMed ID: 9761387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
