These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Node self-connections in network metrics. Saura S Ecol Lett; 2018 Feb; 21(2):319-320. PubMed ID: 29194935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Local connections and the larval competency strongly influence marine metapopulation persistence. Cecino G; Treml EA Ecol Appl; 2021 Jun; 31(4):e02302. PubMed ID: 33565673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spatially structured metapopulation models: global and local assessment of metapopulation capacity. Ovaskainen O; Hanski I Theor Popul Biol; 2001 Dec; 60(4):281-302. PubMed ID: 11878830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Hanski I; Ovaskainen O Nature; 2000 Apr; 404(6779):755-8. PubMed ID: 10783887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Metapopulation modelling of riparian tree species persistence in river networks under climate change. Van Looy K; Piffady J J Environ Manage; 2017 Nov; 202(Pt 2):437-446. PubMed ID: 27889364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Extinction dynamics in experimental metapopulations. Molofsky J; Ferdy JB Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2005 Mar; 102(10):3726-31. PubMed ID: 15738405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Developing metapopulation connectivity criteria from genetic and habitat data to recover the endangered Mexican wolf. Carroll C; Fredrickson RJ; Lacy RC Conserv Biol; 2014 Feb; 28(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 24112074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Metapopulation dynamics: Does it help to have more of the same? Hanski I Trends Ecol Evol; 1989 Apr; 4(4):113-4. PubMed ID: 21227332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term persistence of species and the SLOSS problem. Ovaskainen O J Theor Biol; 2002 Oct; 218(4):419-33. PubMed ID: 12384046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Geometric indicators of population persistence in branching continuous-space networks. Sarhad J; Manifold S; Anderson KE J Math Biol; 2017 Mar; 74(4):981-1009. PubMed ID: 27544197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Species-level persistence probabilities for recovery and conservation status assessment. Che-Castaldo JP; Neel MC Conserv Biol; 2016 Dec; 30(6):1297-1306. PubMed ID: 27030933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Local epiphyte establishment and future metapopulation dynamics in landscapes with different spatiotemporal properties. Belinchón R; Harrison PJ; Mair L; Várkonyi G; Snäll T Ecology; 2017 Mar; 98(3):741-750. PubMed ID: 27984632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How does intraspecific density regulation influence metapopulation synchrony and persistence? Münkemüller T; Johst K J Theor Biol; 2007 Apr; 245(3):553-63. PubMed ID: 17174981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prioritizing Urban Habitats for Connectivity Conservation: Integrating Centrality and Ecological Metrics. Poodat F; Arrowsmith C; Fraser D; Gordon A Environ Manage; 2015 Sep; 56(3):664-74. PubMed ID: 25924790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does colonization asymmetry matter in metapopulations? Vuilleumier S; Possingham HP Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Jul; 273(1594):1637-42. PubMed ID: 16769635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new method for conservation planning for the persistence of multiple species. Nicholson E; Westphal MI; Frank K; Rochester WA; Pressey RL; Lindenmayer DB; Possingham HP Ecol Lett; 2006 Sep; 9(9):1049-60. PubMed ID: 16925654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]