These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29460955)

  • 1. A pilot study: Can the UFOV assessment be used as a repeated measure to determine timing of on-road assessment in stroke?
    McNamara A; John Barr C; Bond MJ; George S
    Aust Occup Ther J; 2019 Feb; 66(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 29460955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Establishing criterion validity of the Useful Field of View assessment and Stroke Drivers' Screening Assessment: comparison to the result of on-road assessment.
    George S; Crotty M
    Am J Occup Ther; 2010; 64(1):114-22. PubMed ID: 20131571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting older driver on-road performance by means of the useful field of view and trail making test part B.
    Classen S; Wang Y; Crizzle AM; Winter SM; Lanford DN
    Am J Occup Ther; 2013; 67(5):574-82. PubMed ID: 23968796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical Tests Predicting On-Road Performance in Older Drivers with Cognitive Impairment.
    Krasniuk S; Crizzle AM; Toxopeus R; Mychael D; Prince N
    Can J Occup Ther; 2023 Mar; 90(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 35950229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Useful field of view predicts driving in the presence of distracters.
    Wood JM; Chaparro A; Lacherez P; Hickson L
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Apr; 89(4):373-81. PubMed ID: 22366710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Driving Characteristics of Older Drivers and Their Relationship to the Useful Field of View Test.
    Dukic Willstrand T; Broberg T; Selander H
    Gerontology; 2017; 63(2):180-188. PubMed ID: 27764828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Older drivers: On-road and off-road test results.
    Selander H; Lee HC; Johansson K; Falkmer T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 Jul; 43(4):1348-54. PubMed ID: 21545864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of the UFOV to evaluate and retrain visual attention skills in clients with stroke: a pilot study.
    Mazer BL; Sofer S; Korner-Bitensky N; Gelinas I
    Am J Occup Ther; 2001; 55(5):552-7. PubMed ID: 14601816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive prerequisites for fitness to drive: Norm values for the TMT, UFOV and NorSDSA tests.
    Selander H; Wressle E; Samuelsson K
    Scand J Occup Ther; 2020 Apr; 27(3):231-239. PubMed ID: 31088186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of the Visual Recognition Slide Test with stroke: a component of the New South Wales occupational therapy off-road driver rehabilitation program.
    George S; Clark M; Crotty M
    Aust Occup Ther J; 2008 Sep; 55(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 20887459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Usefulness of screening tools for predicting driving performance in people with Parkinson's disease.
    Classen S; Witter DP; Lanford DN; Okun MS; Rodriguez RL; Romrell J; Malaty I; Fernandez HH
    Am J Occup Ther; 2011; 65(5):579-88. PubMed ID: 22026326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploring the relationship between self-awareness of driving efficacy and that of a proxy when determining fitness to drive after stroke.
    Stapleton T; Connolly D; O'Neill D
    Aust Occup Ther J; 2012 Feb; 59(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 22272884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retraining moderately impaired stroke survivors in driving-related visual attention skills.
    Akinwuntan AE; Devos H; Verheyden G; Baten G; Kiekens C; Feys H; De Weerdt W
    Top Stroke Rehabil; 2010; 17(5):328-36. PubMed ID: 21131257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retrospective analysis of factors that affect driving assessment outcomes after stroke.
    Chua M; McCluskey A; Smead JM
    Aust Occup Ther J; 2012 Apr; 59(2):121-30. PubMed ID: 22448992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The useful field of view assessment predicts simulated commercial motor vehicle driving safety.
    McManus B; Heaton K; Vance DE; Stavrinos D
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Oct; 17(7):763-9. PubMed ID: 26890935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting Motor Vehicle Collisions in a Driving Simulator in Young Adults Using the Useful Field of View Assessment.
    McManus B; Cox MK; Vance DE; Stavrinos D
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(8):818-23. PubMed ID: 25794266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the road again after traumatic brain injury: driver safety and behaviour following on-road assessment and rehabilitation.
    Ross P; Ponsford JL; Di Stefano M; Charlton J; Spitz G
    Disabil Rehabil; 2016; 38(10):994-1005. PubMed ID: 26312651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation of the capacity to drive in patients diagnosed of mild cognitive impairment and dementia].
    Badenes Guia D; Casas Hernanz L; Cejudo Bolivar JC; Aguilar Barberà M
    Neurologia; 2008 Nov; 23(9):575-82. PubMed ID: 18307055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Occupational therapy practice in predriving assessment post stroke in the Irish context: findings from a nominal group technique meeting.
    Stapleton T; Connelly D
    Top Stroke Rehabil; 2010; 17(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 20410013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. UFOV performance and driving ability following traumatic brain injury.
    Novack TA; Baños JH; Alderson AL; Schneider JJ; Weed W; Blankenship J; Salisbury D
    Brain Inj; 2006 May; 20(5):455-61. PubMed ID: 16716991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.