207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29461409)
1. Repeatability of Monocular Acuity Testing in Adults with and without Down Syndrome.
Ravikumar A; Benoit JS; Morrison KB; Marsack JD; Anderson HA
Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Mar; 95(3):202-211. PubMed ID: 29461409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Randomized Trial of Objective Spectacle Prescriptions for Adults with Down Syndrome: Baseline Data and Methods.
Anderson HA; Benoit JS; Marsack JD; Manny RE; Ravikumar A; Fern KD; Trast KR
Optom Vis Sci; 2021 Jan; 98(1):88-99. PubMed ID: 33394936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual acuity results in school-aged children and adults: Lea Symbols chart versus Bailey-Lovie chart.
Dobson V; Maguire M; Orel-Bixler D; Quinn G; Ying GS;
Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Sep; 80(9):650-4. PubMed ID: 14502046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do picture-based charts overestimate visual acuity? Comparison of Kay Pictures, Lea Symbols, HOTV and Keeler logMAR charts with Sloan letters in adults and children.
Anstice NS; Jacobs RJ; Simkin SK; Thomson M; Thompson B; Collins AV
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0170839. PubMed ID: 28152076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Repeatability of ETDRS visual acuity in children.
Manny RE; Hussein M; Gwiazda J; Marsh-Tootle W;
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Aug; 44(8):3294-300. PubMed ID: 12882773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Normative visual acuity in infants and preschool-aged children in Sydney.
Leone JF; Mitchell P; Kifley A; Rose KA;
Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Nov; 92(7):e521-9. PubMed ID: 24606232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Repeatability of the Waterloo Four-Contrast LogMAR Visual Acuity chart and Near Vision Test card on a group of normal young adults.
Cho P; Woo GC
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Sep; 24(5):427-35. PubMed ID: 15315657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Low-contrast acuity measurement: does it add value in the visual assessment of down syndrome and cerebral palsy populations?
Little JA; McCullough S; McClelland J; Jackson AJ; Saunders KJ
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jan; 54(1):251-7. PubMed ID: 23233262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Repeatability of mesopic visual acuity measurements using high- and low-contrast ETDRS letter charts.
Barrio A; Antona B; Puell MC
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015 May; 253(5):791-5. PubMed ID: 25488572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the HOTV and Lea symbols visual acuity tests in patients with amblyopia.
Ruttum MS; Dahlgren M
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2006; 43(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 16761636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the amblyopia treatment study HOTV and electronic-early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity protocols in children aged 5 to 12 years.
Rice ML; Leske DA; Holmes JM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Feb; 137(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 14962417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Visual acuity testability and comparability in Australian preschool children: the Sydney Paediatric Eye Disease Study.
Leone JF; Gole GA; Mitchell P; Kifley A; Pai AS; Rose KA
Eye (Lond); 2012 Jul; 26(7):925-32. PubMed ID: 22498798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Should tumbling E go out of date in amblyopia screening? Evidence from a population-based sample normative in children aged 3-4 years.
Guimaraes S; Fernandes T; Costa P; Silva E
Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 102(6):761-766. PubMed ID: 28988161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is conversion of decimal visual acuity measurements to logMAR values reliable?
Mataftsi A; Koutsimpogeorgos D; Brazitikos P; Ziakas N; Haidich AB
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Jul; 257(7):1513-1517. PubMed ID: 31069515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Threshold visual acuity testing of preschool children using the crowded HOTV and Lea Symbols acuity tests.
Cyert L; Schmidt P; Maguire M; Moore B; Dobson V; Quinn G;
J AAPOS; 2003 Dec; 7(6):396-9. PubMed ID: 14730291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of visual acuity charts in young adults and patients with diabetic retinopathy.
Plainis S; Kontadakis G; Feloni E; Giannakopoulou T; Tsilimbaris MK; Pallikaris IG; Moschandreas J
Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Feb; 90(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 23314130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Visual Acuity Testing Using a Random Method Visual Acuity Application.
Rhiu S; Lee HJ; Goo YS; Cho K; Kim JH
Telemed J E Health; 2016 Mar; 22(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 26280910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feasibility and comparison of visual acuity testing methods in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 and/or optic pathway gliomas.
Avery RA; Bouffet E; Packer RJ; Reginald A
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Feb; 54(2):1034-8. PubMed ID: 23329671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differences in visual acuity between the eyes: determination of normal limits in a clinical population.
Brown B; Yap MK
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1995 May; 15(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 7659416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Repeatability of near visual acuity measurement at high and low contrast.
Lam AK; Tong C; Tse J; Yu M
Clin Exp Optom; 2008 Sep; 91(5):447-52. PubMed ID: 18761475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
