These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29461716)

  • 21. Probability error in diagnosis: the conjunction fallacy among beginning medical students.
    Rao G
    Fam Med; 2009 Apr; 41(4):262-5. PubMed ID: 19343556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Natural sample spaces and uncertain belief.
    Gavanski I; Hui C
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1992 Nov; 63(5):766-80. PubMed ID: 1447692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Broken Physics: A Conjunction-Fallacy Effect in Intuitive Physical Reasoning.
    Ludwin-Peery E; Bramley NR; Davis E; Gureckis TM
    Psychol Sci; 2020 Dec; 31(12):1602-1611. PubMed ID: 33137265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Typicality and reasoning fallacies.
    Shafir EB; Smith EE; Osherson DN
    Mem Cognit; 1990 May; 18(3):229-39. PubMed ID: 2355854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Random variation and systematic biases in probability estimation.
    Howe R; Costello F
    Cogn Psychol; 2020 Dec; 123():101306. PubMed ID: 33189032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Influence of Effortful Thought and Cognitive Proficiencies on the Conjunction Fallacy: Implications for Dual-Process Theories of Reasoning and Judgment.
    Scherer LD; Yates JF; Baker SG; Valentine KD
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2017 Jun; 43(6):874-887. PubMed ID: 28903676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparability effects in probability judgments.
    Pleskac TJ
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Aug; 23(8):848-54. PubMed ID: 22825358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Asymmetries in predictive and diagnostic reasoning.
    Fernbach PM; Darlow A; Sloman SA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 May; 140(2):168-85. PubMed ID: 21219081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Frequency, probability, and prediction: easy solutions to cognitive illusions?
    Griffin D; Buehler R
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Feb; 38(1):48-78. PubMed ID: 10090798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Linda is not a bearded lady: configural weighting and adding as the cause of extension errors.
    Nilsson H; Winman A; Juslin P; Hansson G
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Nov; 138(4):517-34. PubMed ID: 19883134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Representativeness and conjoint probability.
    Gavanski I; Roskos-Ewoldsen DR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1991 Aug; 61(2):181-94. PubMed ID: 1920061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The conjunction effect: new evidence for robustness.
    Stolarz-Fantino S; Fantino E; Zizzo DJ; Wen J
    Am J Psychol; 2003; 116(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 12710220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An associative framework for probability judgment: an application to biases.
    Cobos PL; Almaraz J; García-Madruga JA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Jan; 29(1):80-96. PubMed ID: 12549585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An account of subjective probability judgment for joint events: Conjunctive and disjunctive.
    Fisk JE; Marshall DA; Rogers P; Stock R
    Scand J Psychol; 2019 Oct; 60(5):405-420. PubMed ID: 31242534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Disentangling the order effect from the context effect: analogies, homologies, and quantum probability.
    Khalil EL
    Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):293-4. PubMed ID: 23673039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Inferring conjunctive probabilities from noisy samples: evidence for the configural weighted average model.
    Jenny MA; Rieskamp J; Nilsson H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):203-17. PubMed ID: 24128388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The conjunction fallacy?
    Wolford G; Taylor HA; Beck JR
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 2314227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Corrigendum: Is There a Conjunction Fallacy in Legal Probabilistic Decision Making?
    Wojciechowski BW; Pothos EM
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2281. PubMed ID: 30542306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Conjunction and Disjunction Fallacies: Explanations of the Linda Problem by the Equate-to-Differentiate Model.
    Lu Y
    Integr Psychol Behav Sci; 2016 Sep; 50(3):507-31. PubMed ID: 26077336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quantum probability and conceptual combination in conjunctions.
    Hampton JA
    Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):290-1. PubMed ID: 23673036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.