These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

506 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29461746)

  • 1. Marginal and Internal Gap of Handmade, Milled and 3D Printed Additive Manufactured Patterns for Pressed Lithium Disilicate Onlay Restorations.
    Revilla-León M; Olea-Vielba M; Esteso-Saiz A; Martínez-Klemm I; Özcan M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2018 Mar; 26(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 29461746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated with milling, 3D printing, and conventional technologies.
    Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):783-790. PubMed ID: 28969918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of fit accuracy of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated from wax or resin patterns with conventional and CAD-CAM technologies.
    Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Oct; 120(4):530-536. PubMed ID: 30318049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effect of Different Wax Pattern Fabrication Techniques on the Marginal Fit of Customized Lithium Disilicate Implant Abutments.
    Taha D; Nour M; Zohdy M; El-Etreby A; Hamdy A; Salah T
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Dec; 28(9):1018-1023. PubMed ID: 31573716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fit of pressed crowns fabricated from two CAD-CAM wax pattern process plans: A comparative in vitro study.
    Shamseddine L; Mortada R; Rifai K; Chidiac JJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 28024815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fit Accuracy of Pressed and Milled Lithium Disilicate Inlays Fabricated From Conventional Impressions or a Laboratory-Based Digital Workflow.
    Homsy F; Bottin M; Özcan M; Majzoub Z
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2019 Feb; 27(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 30779496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal and internal fit of pressed ceramic crowns made from conventional and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing wax patterns: An in vitro comparison.
    Shamseddine L; Mortada R; Rifai K; Chidiac JJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 26948080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate veneers fabricated via a manual waxing technique versus a 3D printed technique.
    Guachetá L; Stevens CD; Tamayo Cardona JA; Murgueitio R
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jun; 34(4):715-720. PubMed ID: 33174306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marginal Fit of Lithium Disilicate Crowns Fabricated Using Conventional and Digital Methodology: A Three-Dimensional Analysis.
    Mostafa NZ; Ruse ND; Ford NL; Carvalho RM; Wyatt CCL
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 27(2):145-152. PubMed ID: 28833920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro.
    Schaefer O; Decker M; Wittstock F; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24508541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of inlay and onlay restorations based on 3D printing or milling technique - a pilot study.
    Ahlholm P; Sipilä K; Vallittu P; Kotiranta U; Lappalainen R
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2019 May; 27(2):56-64. PubMed ID: 31046209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate endocrowns fabricated using conventional, digital, and combination techniques.
    Abduljawad DE; Rayyan MR
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jun; 34(4):707-714. PubMed ID: 35294099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques.
    Keshvad A; Hooshmand T; Asefzadeh F; Khalilinejad F; Alihemmati M; Van Noort R
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 21806704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An in vitro comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of ultrathin occlusal veneers made of 3D-printed zirconia, milled zirconia, and heat-pressed lithium disilicate.
    Ioannidis A; Park JM; Hüsler J; Bomze D; Mühlemann S; Özcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):709-715. PubMed ID: 33741143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated from conventional and digital impressions assessed with micro-CT.
    Kim JH; Jeong JH; Lee JH; Cho HW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Oct; 116(4):551-557. PubMed ID: 27422237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
    Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal and internal fit of heat pressed versus CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic onlays after exposure to thermo-mechanical fatigue.
    Guess PC; Vagkopoulou T; Zhang Y; Wolkewitz M; Strub JR
    J Dent; 2014 Feb; 42(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 24161516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners.
    Abdel-Azim T; Rogers K; Elathamna E; Zandinejad A; Metz M; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 26100929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional evaluation of marginal and internal fit of 3D-printed interim restorations fabricated on different finish line designs.
    Alharbi N; Alharbi S; Cuijpers VMJI; Osman RB; Wismeijer D
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Apr; 62(2):218-226. PubMed ID: 29032176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.