These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29461865)

  • 1. Validation of auditory detection response task method for assessing the attentional effects of cognitive load.
    Stojmenova K; Sodnik J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jul; 19(5):495-500. PubMed ID: 29461865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the selection of stimulus for the auditory variant of the detection response task method for driving experiments.
    Stojmenova K; Policardi F; Sodnik J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jan; 19(1):23-27. PubMed ID: 28594238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitivity evaluation of the visual, tactile, and auditory detection response task method while driving.
    Stojmenova K; Jakus G; Sodnik J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(4):431-436. PubMed ID: 27588336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An analysis of the suitability of a low-cost eye tracker for assessing the cognitive load of drivers.
    Čegovnik T; Stojmenova K; Jakus G; Sodnik J
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Apr; 68():1-11. PubMed ID: 29409621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modeling cognitive load effects of conversation between a passenger and driver.
    Tillman G; Strayer D; Eidels A; Heathcote A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Aug; 79(6):1795-1803. PubMed ID: 28537009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection-Response Task-Uses and Limitations.
    Stojmenova K; Sodnik J
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Feb; 18(2):. PubMed ID: 29443949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Broader Application of the Detection Response Task to Cognitive Tasks and Online Environments.
    Innes RJ; Evans NJ; Howard ZL; Eidels A; Brown SD
    Hum Factors; 2021 Aug; 63(5):896-909. PubMed ID: 32749155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the Cost of Detection Response Task Performance on Cognitive Load.
    Biondi FN; Balasingam B; Ayare P
    Hum Factors; 2021 Aug; 63(5):804-812. PubMed ID: 32552116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Effects of Cognitive and Visual Workload on Peripheral Detection in the Detection Response Task.
    van Winsum W
    Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):855-869. PubMed ID: 29791188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tactile Stimuli Increase Effects of Modality Compatibility in Task Switching.
    Stephan DN; Koch I
    Exp Psychol; 2015; 62(4):276-84. PubMed ID: 26421450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cognitive workload measurement and modeling under divided attention.
    Castro SC; Strayer DL; Matzke D; Heathcote A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jun; 45(6):826-839. PubMed ID: 30998070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of mental workload on involuntary attention: A somatosensory ERP study.
    Mun S; Whang M; Park S; Park MC
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Nov; 106():7-20. PubMed ID: 28827155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of age and auditory and visual dual tasks on closed-road driving performance.
    Chaparro A; Wood JM; Carberry T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Aug; 82(8):747-54. PubMed ID: 16127341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of cognitive load on susceptibility to audio.
    van der Heiden RMA; Janssen CP; Donker SF; Kenemans JL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Apr; 205():103058. PubMed ID: 32199246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrophysiological correlates of attentional monitoring during a complex driving simulation task.
    Gianfranchi E; Mento G; Duma GM; Chierchia C; Sarlo M; Tagliabue M
    Biol Psychol; 2020 Jul; 154():107918. PubMed ID: 32534108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Brain-based limitations in attention and secondary task engagement during high-fidelity driving simulation among young adults.
    Banz BC; Wu J; Camenga DR; Mayes LC; Crowley MJ; Vaca FE
    Neuroreport; 2020 May; 31(8):619-623. PubMed ID: 32366810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of task modality and stimulus frequency in paced serial addition tests on functional brain activity.
    Gielen J; Wiels W; Van Schependom J; Laton J; Van Hecke W; Parizel PM; D'hooghe MB; Nagels G
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0194388. PubMed ID: 29543871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dual-task interference and response strategies in simulated car driving: impact of first-task characteristics on the psychological refractory period effect.
    Bock O; Wechsler K; Koch I; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):568-576. PubMed ID: 31776662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Event-related potentials and secondary task performance during simulated driving.
    Wester AE; Böcker KB; Volkerts ER; Verster JC; Kenemans JL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jan; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 18215526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigating the influence of working memory capacity when driving behavior is combined with cognitive load: An LCT study of young novice drivers.
    Ross V; Jongen EM; Wang W; Brijs T; Brijs K; Ruiter RA; Wets G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jan; 62():377-87. PubMed ID: 23915472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.