These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29462656)

  • 21. Evoked activity and EEG phase resetting in the genesis of auditory Go/NoGo ERPs.
    Barry RJ
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Mar; 80(3):292-9. PubMed ID: 19028546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Using principal components analysis to examine resting state EEG in relation to task performance.
    Karamacoska D; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Psychophysiology; 2019 May; 56(5):e13327. PubMed ID: 30613986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sex differences in equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: effects on N2 and P3.
    Melynyte S; Ruksenas O; Griskova-Bulanova I
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 May; 235(5):1565-1574. PubMed ID: 28258436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Auditory stimulus- and response-locked ERP components and behavior.
    Fogarty JS; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Psychophysiology; 2020 May; 57(5):e13538. PubMed ID: 32010995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prestimulus alpha and beta contributions to equiprobable Go/NoGo processing in healthy ageing.
    De Blasio FM; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Sep; 155():32-40. PubMed ID: 32479772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dynamics of narrow-band EEG phase effects in the passive auditory oddball task.
    Barry RJ; Rushby JA; Smith JL; Clarke AR; Croft RJ
    Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Jul; 24(1):291-304. PubMed ID: 16882025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Preferred pre-stimulus EEG states affect cognitive event-related potentials.
    Barry RJ
    Suppl Clin Neurophysiol; 2013; 62():55-65. PubMed ID: 24053031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. EEG frequency PCA in EEG-ERP dynamics.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
    Psychophysiology; 2018 May; 55(5):e13042. PubMed ID: 29226962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. ERP Go/NoGo condition effects are better detected with separate PCAs.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Fogarty JS; Karamacoska D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Aug; 106():50-64. PubMed ID: 27289050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Child sex differences in the auditory equiprobable Go/NoGo task.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Cave AE
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2022 Jul; 177():148-158. PubMed ID: 35605691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sequential processing in young and older adults in the equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Cave AE
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 May; 127(5):2273-85. PubMed ID: 27072100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Event-related potentials to response production and inhibition in go/nogo task. I. Topographical characteristics to different visual stimulus sequences].
    Kaga Y; Iwadare Y; Noguchi S; Tando T; Aihara M
    No To Hattatsu; 2008 Jan; 40(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 18210859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Nontarget-to-nontarget interval determines the nontarget P300 in an auditory equiprobable Go/NoGo task.
    Steiner GZ; Barry RJ; Gonsalvez CJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Jun; 92(3):113-21. PubMed ID: 24681026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Response competition and response inhibition during different choice-discrimination tasks: evidence from ERP measured inside MRI scanner.
    Gonzalez-Rosa JJ; Inuggi A; Blasi V; Cursi M; Annovazzi P; Comi G; Falini A; Leocani L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 23664841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Resting state intrinsic EEG impacts on go stimulus-response processes.
    Karamacoska D; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Jun; 54(6):894-903. PubMed ID: 28258583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
    Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The First 250 ms of Auditory Processing: No Evidence of Early Processing Negativity in the Go/NoGo Task.
    Fogarty JS; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):4041. PubMed ID: 32132630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Event-related potentials in the auditory oddball as a function of EEG alpha phase at stimulus onset.
    Barry RJ; Rushby JA; Johnstone SJ; Clarke AR; Croft RJ; Lawrence CA
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 115(11):2593-601. PubMed ID: 15465449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Caffeine effects on ERPs and performance in an auditory Go/NoGo task.
    Barry RJ; Johnstone SJ; Clarke AR; Rushby JA; Brown CR; McKenzie DN
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Dec; 118(12):2692-9. PubMed ID: 17905651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. On the use of event-related potentials to auditory stimuli in the Go/NoGo task.
    Smith JL; Douglas KM
    Psychiatry Res; 2011 Sep; 193(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 21764566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.