BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29462839)

  • 1. Sensitivity analysis for unobserved confounding of direct and indirect effects using uncertainty intervals.
    Lindmark A; de Luna X; Eriksson M
    Stat Med; 2018 May; 37(10):1744-1762. PubMed ID: 29462839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Causal inference accounting for unobserved confounding after outcome regression and doubly robust estimation.
    Genbäck M; de Luna X
    Biometrics; 2019 Jun; 75(2):506-515. PubMed ID: 30430543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A principal stratification approach for evaluating natural direct and indirect effects in the presence of treatment-induced intermediate confounding.
    Taguri M; Chiba Y
    Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(1):131-44. PubMed ID: 25312003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two-step estimation in ratio-of-mediator-probability weighted causal mediation analysis.
    Bein E; Deutsch J; Hong G; Porter KE; Qin X; Yang C
    Stat Med; 2018 Apr; 37(8):1304-1324. PubMed ID: 29322536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Socioeconomic status and survival after stroke - using mediation and sensitivity analyses to assess the effect of stroke severity and unmeasured confounding.
    Lindmark A; Norrving B; Eriksson M
    BMC Public Health; 2020 Apr; 20(1):554. PubMed ID: 32334556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing moderated mediation in linear models requires fewer confounding assumptions than assessing mediation.
    Loeys T; Talloen W; Goubert L; Moerkerke B; Vansteelandt S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):352-374. PubMed ID: 27711981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bias Formulas for Estimating Direct and Indirect Effects When Unmeasured Confounding Is Present.
    le Cessie S
    Epidemiology; 2016 Jan; 27(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 26426943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in causal mediation analysis.
    McCandless LC; Somers JM
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Feb; 28(2):515-531. PubMed ID: 28882092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. G-computation demonstration in causal mediation analysis.
    Wang A; Arah OA
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1119-27. PubMed ID: 26537707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mediation analysis in epidemiology: methods, interpretation and bias.
    Richiardi L; Bellocco R; Zugna D
    Int J Epidemiol; 2013 Oct; 42(5):1511-9. PubMed ID: 24019424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of Natural Indirect Effects Robust to Unmeasured Confounding and Mediator Measurement Error.
    Fulcher IR; Shi X; Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ
    Epidemiology; 2019 Nov; 30(6):825-834. PubMed ID: 31478915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Causal mediation analysis on failure time outcome without sequential ignorability.
    Zheng C; Zhou XH
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2017 Oct; 23(4):533-559. PubMed ID: 27464958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification and robust estimation of swapped direct and indirect effects: Mediation analysis with unmeasured mediator-outcome confounding and intermediate confounding.
    Tai AS; Lin SH
    Stat Med; 2022 Sep; 41(21):4143-4158. PubMed ID: 35716042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How do unobserved confounding mediators and measurement error impact estimated mediation effects and corresponding statistical inferences? Introducing the R package ConMed for sensitivity analysis.
    Lin Q; Nuttall AK; Zhang Q; Frank KA
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Apr; 28(2):339-358. PubMed ID: 37166933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distribution-free mediation analysis for nonlinear models with confounding.
    Albert JM
    Epidemiology; 2012 Nov; 23(6):879-88. PubMed ID: 23007042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Examining the role of unmeasured confounding in mediation analysis with genetic and genomic applications.
    Lutz SM; Thwing A; Schmiege S; Kroehl M; Baker CD; Starling AP; Hokanson JE; Ghosh D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jul; 18(1):344. PubMed ID: 28724417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Confounding of indirect effects: a sensitivity analysis exploring the range of bias due to a cause common to both the mediator and the outcome.
    Hafeman DM
    Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 174(6):710-7. PubMed ID: 21652602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Causal Mediation Analysis in the Presence of Post-treatment Confounding Variables: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study.
    Kisbu-Sakarya Y; MacKinnon DP; Valente MJ; Çetinkaya E
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():2067. PubMed ID: 32922345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Joint mixed-effects models for causal inference with longitudinal data.
    Shardell M; Ferrucci L
    Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(5):829-846. PubMed ID: 29205454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A review of causal estimation of effects in mediation analyses.
    Ten Have TR; Joffe MM
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2012 Feb; 21(1):77-107. PubMed ID: 21163849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.