These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29464666)

  • 1. Application of Discrete-Choice Experiment Methods in Tobacco Control: A Systematic Review.
    Regmi K; Kaphle D; Timilsina S; Tuha NAA
    Pharmacoecon Open; 2018 Mar; 2(1):5-17. PubMed ID: 29464666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The application of discrete choice experiments eliciting young peoples' preferences for healthcare: a systematic literature review.
    Williams G; Kinchin I
    Eur J Health Econ; 2023 Aug; 24(6):987-998. PubMed ID: 36169764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk as an attribute in discrete choice experiments: a systematic review of the literature.
    Harrison M; Rigby D; Vass C; Flynn T; Louviere J; Payne K
    Patient; 2014; 7(2):151-70. PubMed ID: 24566923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discrete choice experiments in pharmacy: a review of the literature.
    Naik-Panvelkar P; Armour C; Saini B
    Int J Pharm Pract; 2013 Feb; 21(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 23301529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methods for Conducting Stated Preference Research with Children and Adolescents in Health: A Scoping Review of the Application of Discrete Choice Experiments.
    Michaels-Igbokwe C; Currie GR; Kennedy BL; MacDonald KV; Marshall DA
    Patient; 2021 Nov; 14(6):741-758. PubMed ID: 34008164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accounting for Scale Heterogeneity in Healthcare-Related Discrete Choice Experiments when Comparing Stated Preferences: A Systematic Review.
    Wright SJ; Vass CM; Sim G; Burton M; Fiebig DG; Payne K
    Patient; 2018 Oct; 11(5):475-488. PubMed ID: 29492903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do patients and health care providers have discordant preferences about which aspects of treatments matter most? Evidence from a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
    Harrison M; Milbers K; Hudson M; Bansback N
    BMJ Open; 2017 May; 7(5):e014719. PubMed ID: 28515194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.
    Clark MD; Determann D; Petrou S; Moro D; de Bekker-Grob EW
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2014 Sep; 32(9):883-902. PubMed ID: 25005924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) Questionnaire to Understand Veterans' Preferences for Tobacco Treatment in Primary Care.
    Katz DA; Stewart KR; Paez M; Vander Weg MW; Grant KM; Hamlin C; Gaeth G
    Patient; 2018 Dec; 11(6):649-663. PubMed ID: 29855976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A novel design process for selection of attributes for inclusion in discrete choice experiments: case study exploring variation in clinical decision-making about thrombolysis in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke.
    De Brún A; Flynn D; Ternent L; Price CI; Rodgers H; Ford GA; Rudd M; Lancsar E; Simpson S; Teah J; Thomson RG
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Jun; 18(1):483. PubMed ID: 29929523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user's guide.
    Lancsar E; Louviere J
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2008; 26(8):661-77. PubMed ID: 18620460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A systematic review of discrete choice experiments in stroke rehabilitation.
    Jolliffe L; Christie LJ; Fearn N; Nohrenberg M; Liu R; Williams JF; Parsons MW; Pearce AM
    Top Stroke Rehabil; 2024 Sep; 31(6):632-643. PubMed ID: 38372124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discrete choice experiments to generate utility values for multi-attribute utility instruments: a systematic review of methods.
    Bahrampour M; Byrnes J; Norman R; Scuffham PA; Downes M
    Eur J Health Econ; 2020 Sep; 21(7):983-992. PubMed ID: 32367379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Respondent Understanding in Discrete Choice Experiments: A Scoping Review.
    Pearce A; Harrison M; Watson V; Street DJ; Howard K; Bansback N; Bryan S
    Patient; 2021 Jan; 14(1):17-53. PubMed ID: 33141359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Systematic and Critical Review of Discrete Choice Experiments in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
    Collacott H; Zhang D; Heidenreich S; Tervonen T
    Patient; 2022 Jan; 15(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 34250574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What attributes should be included in a discrete choice experiment related to health technologies? A systematic literature review.
    Trapero-Bertran M; Rodríguez-Martín B; López-Bastida J
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219905. PubMed ID: 31318926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Heterogeneity in preferences for smoking cessation.
    Paterson RW; Boyle KJ; Parmeter CF; Neumann JE; De Civita P
    Health Econ; 2008 Dec; 17(12):1363-77. PubMed ID: 18189227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Veterans' preferences for tobacco treatment in primary care: A discrete choice experiment.
    Katz DA; Hamlin C; Vander Weg MW; Grant KM; Stewart Steffensmeier KR; Paez M; Hawley ST; Gaeth G
    Patient Educ Couns; 2020 Mar; 103(3):652-660. PubMed ID: 31629558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methodology to derive preference for health screening programmes using discrete choice experiments: a scoping review.
    Brain D; Jadambaa A; Kularatna S
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Aug; 22(1):1079. PubMed ID: 36002895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.