These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29465174)

  • 1. ERISA Preemptions in Health Plans.
    Benefits Q; 2016; 32(3):47-49. PubMed ID: 29465174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Supreme Court limits lawsuits against managed care organizations.
    Jost TS
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2004; Suppl Web Exclusives():W4-417-26. PubMed ID: 15451950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. U.S. Supreme Court clarifies that owner-employees are protected by ERISA.
    Meadors GM
    J Med Pract Manage; 2004; 20(1):52-4. PubMed ID: 15500025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. U.S. Supreme Court wades into ERISA one more time.
    Roeder KH; Rees JS
    GHA Today; 2004 Aug; 48(7):3, 9. PubMed ID: 15500273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subrogation or subterfuge: the myth of ERISA health benefit plans.
    Murphy GF
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2002; 19(1):309-33. PubMed ID: 12733230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Health plan liability and ERISA: the expanding scope of state legislation.
    Hellinger FJ; Young GJ
    Am J Public Health; 2005 Feb; 95(2):217-23. PubMed ID: 15671453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Who is a fiduciary?--implications of Supreme Court rulings.
    Mitzner IR; Mehler CV
    Empl Benefits J; 2001 Sep; 26(3):33-7. PubMed ID: 11534220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implications of ERISA for health benefits and the number of self-funded ERISA plans.
    Copeland C; Pierron B
    EBRI Issue Brief; 1998 Jan; (193):1-26. PubMed ID: 10177290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Supreme Court sheds a very narrow light on ERISA.
    Steele CJ
    Bus Health; 1995 Jun; 13(6):79, 83. PubMed ID: 10164761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Will the Supreme Court finally eliminate ERISA preemption?
    Trueman DL
    Ann Health Law; 2004; 13(2):427-64, table of contents. PubMed ID: 15281484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Supreme Court clarifies the breadth of ERISA preemption.
    Hershey N
    Hosp Law Newsl; 2004 Oct; 21(12):1-7. PubMed ID: 15495741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.
    Ryland BK
    Manag Care Interface; 2004 Oct; 17(10):55-8. PubMed ID: 15535079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 'MetLife V. Glenn': the Court addresses a conflict over conflicts in ERISA benefit administration.
    Jost TS
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2008; 27(5):w430-40. PubMed ID: 18768537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Supreme Court strikes down state regulation of health plan coverage decisions.
    Meadors GM
    J Med Pract Manage; 2004; 20(3):154-5. PubMed ID: 15672906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The battle over self-insured health plans, or "one good loophole deserves another".
    Korobkin R
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):89-136. PubMed ID: 15742576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Workers of the world, panic!
    Parloff R
    Fortune; 2004 Jul; 150(1):36, 38. PubMed ID: 15270460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Courts continue to wrestle with ERISA preemption.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 2005 May; 22(7):1-5. PubMed ID: 15875752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What is an employee benefit plan?: ERISA preemption of "any willing provider" laws after Pegram.
    Goodyear J
    Columbia Law Rev; 2001 Jun; 101(5):1107-39. PubMed ID: 11942337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The states, Congress, or the courts: who will be first to reform ERISA remedies?
    Rooney CD
    Ann Health Law; 1998; 7():73-106. PubMed ID: 10187382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of delegation on standard of review. Geddes v. United Staffing, 469 F.3d 919 (10th Cir. 2006).
    Benefits Q; 2009; 25(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 19408446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.