BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

440 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29465322)

  • 41. Individual differences in proprioception predict the extent of implicit sensorimotor adaptation.
    Tsay JS; Kim HE; Parvin DE; Stover AR; Ivry RB
    J Neurophysiol; 2021 Apr; 125(4):1307-1321. PubMed ID: 33656948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Proprioceptive recalibration in the right and left hands following abrupt visuomotor adaptation.
    Salomonczyk D; Henriques DY; Cressman EK
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Mar; 217(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 22198532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effect of visuomotor-map uncertainty on visuomotor adaptation.
    Saijo N; Gomi H
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Mar; 107(6):1576-85. PubMed ID: 22190631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Multisensory perception depends on the reliability of the type of judgment.
    Kayser C; Heuer H
    J Neurophysiol; 2024 Apr; 131(4):723-737. PubMed ID: 38416720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Position coding in a video-controlled pointing task with a rotated visual display: evidence for individual differences in visuo-proprioceptive interaction.
    Coello Y; Milleville-Pennel I; Orliaguet JP
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Oct; 369(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 15464267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Contributions of visual and proprioceptive information to travelled distance estimation during changing sensory congruencies.
    Campos JL; Butler JS; Bülthoff HH
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Oct; 232(10):3277-89. PubMed ID: 24961739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. How we perceive the width of grasped objects: Insights into the central processes that govern proprioceptive judgements.
    Héroux ME; Fisher G; Axelson LH; Butler AA; Gandevia SC
    J Physiol; 2024 Jun; 602(12):2899-2916. PubMed ID: 38734987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. When feeling is more important than seeing in sensorimotor adaptation.
    van Beers RJ; Wolpert DM; Haggard P
    Curr Biol; 2002 May; 12(10):834-7. PubMed ID: 12015120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The cerebellum is not necessary for visually driven recalibration of hand proprioception.
    Henriques DY; Filippopulos F; Straube A; Eggert T
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Nov; 64():195-204. PubMed ID: 25278133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Changing the size of a mirror-reflected hand moderates the experience of embodiment but not proprioceptive drift: a repeated measures study on healthy human participants.
    Wittkopf PG; Lloyd DM; Johnson MI
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 235(6):1933-1944. PubMed ID: 28315946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Force field adaptation can be learned using vision in the absence of proprioceptive error.
    Melendez-Calderon A; Masia L; Gassert R; Sandini G; Burdet E
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2011 Jun; 19(3):298-306. PubMed ID: 21652280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The visual encoding of purely proprioceptive intermanual tasks is due to the need of transforming joint signals, not to their interhemispheric transfer.
    Arnoux L; Fromentin S; Farotto D; Beraneck M; McIntyre J; Tagliabue M
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Sep; 118(3):1598-1608. PubMed ID: 28615330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Visuo-proprioceptive integration and recalibration with multiple visual stimuli.
    Debats NB; Heuer H; Kayser C
    Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):21640. PubMed ID: 34737371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Direction-dependent integration of vision and proprioception in reaching under the influence of the mirror illusion.
    Snijders HJ; Holmes NP; Spence C
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):496-505. PubMed ID: 16499935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Visual bias of unseen hand position with a mirror: spatial and temporal factors.
    Holmes NP; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 166(3-4):489-97. PubMed ID: 16032401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Body ownership and agency: task-dependent effects of the virtual hand illusion on proprioceptive drift.
    Shibuya S; Unenaka S; Ohki Y
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jan; 235(1):121-134. PubMed ID: 27651139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Artificial proprioception for myoelectric control.
    Pistohl T; Jackson A; Gowrishankar G; Joshi D; Nazarpour K
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():1595-8. PubMed ID: 24110007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Bodily illusions in young children: developmental change in visual and proprioceptive contributions to perceived hand position.
    Bremner AJ; Hill EL; Pratt M; Rigato S; Spence C
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e51887. PubMed ID: 23382813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Experiencing the Cross-Sensory Error Signal During Movement Leads to Proprioceptive Recalibration.
    Maksimovic S; Neville KM; Cressman EK
    J Mot Behav; 2020; 52(1):122-129. PubMed ID: 30761949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Integration of proprioceptive and visual feedback during online control of reaching.
    Kasuga S; Crevecoeur F; Cross KP; Balalaie P; Scott SH
    J Neurophysiol; 2022 Feb; 127(2):354-372. PubMed ID: 34907796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.