These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

630 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29466265)

  • 1. Characteristics of Real-World Signal to Noise Ratios and Speech Listening Situations of Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Chipara O; Hasan SS; Welhaven A; Oleson J
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):293-304. PubMed ID: 29466265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sound localization in noise by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
    Kerber S; Seeber BU
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):445-57. PubMed ID: 22588270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effect of Signal to Noise Ratio on Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials Elicited to Speech Stimuli in Infants and Adults With Normal Hearing.
    Small SA; Sharma M; Bradford M; Mandikal Vasuki PR
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):305-317. PubMed ID: 28863034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effect of Signal-to-Noise Ratio on Linguistic Processing in a Semantic Judgment Task: An Aging Study.
    Stanley N; Davis T; Estis J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Mar; 28(3):209-221. PubMed ID: 28277212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of Signal-to-Noise Ratios in Realistic Sound Scenarios.
    Smeds K; Wolters F; Rung M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):183-96. PubMed ID: 25690777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults.
    Neuman AC; Wroblewski M; Hajicek J; Rubinstein A
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 20215967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acceptable Noise Levels and Preferred Signal-to-noise Ratios for Speech and Music.
    Lee D; Lewis JD; Johnstone PM; Plyler PN
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(3):1013-1022. PubMed ID: 34759206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech understanding and listening effort in cochlear implant users - microphone beamformers lead to significant improvements in noisy environments.
    Büchner A; Schwebs M; Lenarz T
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Jan; 21(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 31590612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Construct Validity of the Ecological Momentary Assessment in Audiology Research.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Zhang X; Bentler RA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015; 26(10):872-84. PubMed ID: 26554491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychometric Functions of Dual-Task Paradigms for Measuring Listening Effort.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Zhang X; Perkins J; Eilers E
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):660-670. PubMed ID: 27438866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Norwegian Hearing in Noise Test for Children.
    Myhrum M; Tvete OE; Heldahl MG; Moen I; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):80-92. PubMed ID: 26462169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hearing Loss in Children With Otitis Media With Effusion: Actual and Simulated Effects on Speech Perception.
    Cai T; McPherson B; Li C; Yang F
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):645-655. PubMed ID: 29176394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Effects of Signal to Noise Ratio, T60 , Wide-Dynamic Range Compression Speed, and Digital Noise Reduction in a Virtual Restaurant Setting.
    Ellis GM; Crukley J; Souza PE
    Ear Hear; 2024 May-Jun 01; 45(3):760-774. PubMed ID: 38254265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hearing Aid Noise Reduction Lowers the Sustained Listening Effort During Continuous Speech in Noise-A Combined Pupillometry and EEG Study.
    Fiedler L; Seifi Ala T; Graversen C; Alickovic E; Lunner T; Wendt D
    Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1590-1601. PubMed ID: 33950865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Listening Effort Measured With Pupillometry in Cochlear Implant Users Depends on Sound Level, But Not on the Signal to Noise Ratio When Using the Matrix Test.
    Stronks HC; Tops AL; Quach KW; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM
    Ear Hear; 2024 Nov-Dec 01; 45(6):1461-1473. PubMed ID: 38886888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Challenge of Listening at Home: Speech and Noise Levels in Homes of Young Children With Hearing Loss.
    Benítez-Barrera CR; Grantham DW; Hornsby BWY
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(6):1575-1585. PubMed ID: 33136633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech reception thresholds in noise and self-reported hearing disability in a general adult population.
    Smits C; Kramer SE; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 16957503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
    Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unique patterns of hearing loss and cognition in older adults' neural responses to cues for speech recognition difficulty.
    Eckert MA; Teubner-Rhodes S; Vaden KI; Ahlstrom JB; McClaskey CM; Dubno JR
    Brain Struct Funct; 2022 Jan; 227(1):203-218. PubMed ID: 34632538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.