These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29466561)

  • 1. Comment on Hall et al. (2017), "How to Choose Between Measures of Tinnitus Loudness for Clinical Research? A Report on the Reliability and Validity of an Investigator-Administered Test and a Patient-Reported Measure Using Baseline Data Collected in a Phase IIa Drug Trial".
    Sabour S
    Am J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 27(1):167-168. PubMed ID: 29466561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Author Response to Sabour (2018), "Comment on Hall et al. (2017), 'How to Choose Between Measures of Tinnitus Loudness for Clinical Research? A Report on the Reliability and Validity of an Investigator-Administered Test and a Patient-Reported Measure Using Baseline Data Collected in a Phase IIa Drug Trial'".
    Hall DA; Mehta RL; Fackrell K
    Am J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 27(1):169-170. PubMed ID: 29466545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How to Choose Between Measures of Tinnitus Loudness for Clinical Research? A Report on the Reliability and Validity of an Investigator-Administered Test and a Patient-Reported Measure Using Baseline Data Collected in a Phase IIa Drug Trial.
    Hall DA; Mehta RL; Fackrell K
    Am J Audiol; 2017 Sep; 26(3):338-346. PubMed ID: 28841725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual Reliability of the Standard Clinical Method vs Patient-Centered Tinnitus Likeness Rating for Assessment of Tinnitus Pitch and Loudness Matching.
    Hébert S
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Dec; 144(12):1136-1144. PubMed ID: 30267085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The development and test-retest reliability of a method for matching perceived location of tinnitus.
    Searchfield GD; Kobayashi K; Proudfoot K; Tevoitdale H; Irving S
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Dec; 256():1-8. PubMed ID: 26306658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity and reliability study of three tinnitus self-assessment scales: loudness, annoyance and change.
    Zenner HP; De Maddalena H
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Nov; 125(11):1184-8. PubMed ID: 16353397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring tinnitus parameters: loudness, pitch, and maskability.
    Mitchell CR; Vernon JA; Creedon TA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 May; 4(3):139-51. PubMed ID: 8318704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The superiority of the Goodwin procedure over the traditional procedure in measuring the loudness level of tinnitus.
    Risey J; Briner W; Guth PS; Norris CH
    Ear Hear; 1989 Oct; 10(5):318-22. PubMed ID: 2792585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of iPod-Based Automated Tinnitus Pitch Matching.
    Wunderlich R; Stein A; Engell A; Lau P; Waasem L; Shaykevich A; Rudack C; Pantev C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 25690779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A re-evaluation of tinnitus reliability testing.
    Jacobson GP; Henderson JA; McCaslin DL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2000 Mar; 11(3):156-61. PubMed ID: 10755811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychometric evaluation of visual analog scale for the assessment of chronic tinnitus.
    Adamchic I; Langguth B; Hauptmann C; Tass PA
    Am J Audiol; 2012 Dec; 21(2):215-25. PubMed ID: 22846637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tinnitus Assessment and Management: A Survey of Practicing Audiologists in the United States and Canada.
    Sheppard A; Ishida I; Holder T; Stocking C; Qian J; Sun W
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Feb; 33(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 36049753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Tinnitus Loudness Measures: Matching, Rating, and Scaling.
    Manning C; Grush L; Thielman E; Roberts L; Henry JA
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Mar; 28(1):137-143. PubMed ID: 30938558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimates of loudness, loudness discomfort, and the auditory dynamic range: normative estimates, comparison of procedures, and test-retest reliability.
    Sherlock LP; Formby C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Feb; 16(2):85-100. PubMed ID: 15807048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychoacoustic assessment to improve tinnitus diagnosis.
    Basile CÉ; Fournier P; Hutchins S; Hébert S
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e82995. PubMed ID: 24349414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tinnitus loudness matchings in relation to annoyance and grading of severity.
    Andersson G
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2003 May; 30(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 12753982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measuring tinnitus in pharmaceutical clinical trials.
    Jin IK; Tyler RS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Dec; 152(6):3843. PubMed ID: 36586833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer-automated tinnitus assessment: noise-band matching, maskability, and residual inhibition.
    Henry JA; Roberts LE; Ellingson RM; Thielman EJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):486-504. PubMed ID: 23886426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Missed hearing loss in tinnitus patients with normal audiograms.
    Xiong B; Liu Z; Liu Q; Peng Y; Wu H; Lin Y; Zhao X; Sun W
    Hear Res; 2019 Dec; 384():107826. PubMed ID: 31683074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationship Between Tinnitus Loudness Measure by Visual Analogue Scale and Psychoacoustic Matching of Tinnitus Loudness.
    Raj-Koziak D; Gos E; Świerniak W; Karpiesz L; Niedziałek I; Włodarczyk E; Skarżyński H; Skarżyński PH
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jan; 40(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 30540695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.