These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29467465)
1. Development and validation of a clinical prediction model for patient-reported pain and function after primary total knee replacement surgery. Sanchez-Santos MT; Garriga C; Judge A; Batra RN; Price AJ; Liddle AD; Javaid MK; Cooper C; Murray DW; Arden NK Sci Rep; 2018 Feb; 8(1):3381. PubMed ID: 29467465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictors of outcomes of total knee replacement surgery. Judge A; Arden NK; Cooper C; Kassim Javaid M; Carr AJ; Field RE; Dieppe PA Rheumatology (Oxford); 2012 Oct; 51(10):1804-13. PubMed ID: 22532699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diabetes does not influence the early outcome of total knee replacement: a prospective study assessing the Oxford knee score, short form 12, and patient satisfaction. Clement ND; MacDonald D; Burnett R; Breusch SJ Knee; 2013 Dec; 20(6):437-41. PubMed ID: 23993274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predicting self-reported functional improvement one year after primary total knee arthroplasty using pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measures. Vissers LCM; van Hove RP; van der Zwaard BC Knee; 2020 Jun; 27(3):683-689. PubMed ID: 32563423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcome of revision UKR to TKR when compared to a matched group of TKR of same total arthroplasty lifespan. Jonas SC; Jermin P; Howells N; Porteous A; Murray J; Robinson J Knee; 2019 Mar; 26(2):400-404. PubMed ID: 30792107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Range of movement correlates with the Oxford knee score after total knee replacement: A prediction model and validation. Maempel JF; Clement ND; Brenkel IJ; Walmsley PJ Knee; 2016 Jun; 23(3):511-6. PubMed ID: 26875051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term results of total knee arthroplasty after failed high tibial osteotomy. Paredes-Carnero X; Leyes M; Forriol F; Fernández-Cortiñas AB; Escobar J; Babé JG Int Orthop; 2018 Sep; 42(9):2087-2096. PubMed ID: 29464372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Staged bilateral total knee replacement: changes in expectations and outcomes between the first and second operations. Scott CE; Murray RC; MacDonald DJ; Biant LC Bone Joint J; 2014 Jun; 96-B(6):752-8. PubMed ID: 24891574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multiple joint involvement in total knee replacement for osteoarthritis: Effects on patient-reported outcomes. Perruccio AV; Power JD; Evans HM; Mahomed SR; Gandhi R; Mahomed NN; Davis AM Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken); 2012 Jun; 64(6):838-46. PubMed ID: 22570306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prosthetic alignment after total knee replacement is not associated with dissatisfaction or change in Oxford Knee Score: A multivariable regression analysis. Huijbregts HJ; Khan RJ; Fick DP; Jarrett OM; Haebich S Knee; 2016 Jun; 23(3):535-9. PubMed ID: 26826945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of a model predicting non-satisfaction 1 year after primary total knee replacement in the UK and transportation to Switzerland. Garriga C; Sanchez-Santos MT; Judge A; Perneger T; Hannouche D; Lübbeke A; Arden NK Sci Rep; 2018 Feb; 8(1):3380. PubMed ID: 29467402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variability in long-term pain and function trajectories after total knee replacement: A cohort study. Wylde V; Penfold C; Rose A; Blom AW Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Nov; 105(7):1345-1350. PubMed ID: 31594730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Socioeconomic status affects the Oxford knee score and short-form 12 score following total knee replacement. Clement ND; Jenkins PJ; MacDonald D; Nie YX; Patton JT; Breusch SJ; Howie CR; Biant LC Bone Joint J; 2013 Jan; 95-B(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 23307673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of a prediction model that allows direct comparison of the Oxford Knee Score and American Knee Society clinical rating system. Maempel JF; Clement ND; Brenkel IJ; Walmsley PJ Bone Joint J; 2015 Apr; 97-B(4):503-9. PubMed ID: 25820889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty in patients under 55 years of age. Scott CE; Oliver WM; MacDonald D; Wade FA; Moran M; Breusch SJ Bone Joint J; 2016 Dec; 98-B(12):1625-1634. PubMed ID: 27909124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Total knee replacement in patients with concomitant back pain results in a worse functional outcome and a lower rate of satisfaction. Clement ND; MacDonald D; Simpson AH; Burnett R Bone Joint J; 2013 Dec; 95-B(12):1632-9. PubMed ID: 24293592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prediction model for length of stay after total and unicompartmental knee replacement. Ong PH; Pua YH Bone Joint J; 2013 Nov; 95-B(11):1490-6. PubMed ID: 24151268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CAPAbility: comparison of the JOURNEY II Bi-Cruciate Stabilised and GENESIS II total knee arthroplasty in performance and functional ability: protocol of a randomised controlled trial. Clarke C; Pomeroy V; Clark A; Creelman G; Hancock N; Horton S; Killett A; Mann C; Payerne E; Toms A; Roberts G; Smith T; Swart AM; McNamara I Trials; 2020 Feb; 21(1):222. PubMed ID: 32093769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting individual knee range of motion, knee pain, and walking limitation outcomes following total knee arthroplasty. Pua YH; Poon CL; Seah FJ; Thumboo J; Clark RA; Tan MH; Chong HC; Tan JW; Chew ES; Yeo SJ Acta Orthop; 2019 Apr; 90(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30973090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlations between patient-perceived outcome and objectively-measured biomechanical change following Total Knee Replacement. Biggs PR; Whatling GM; Wilson C; Holt CA Gait Posture; 2019 May; 70():65-70. PubMed ID: 30826689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]