These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2946806)
1. The category effect with rating scales: number of categories, number of stimuli, and method of presentation. Parducci A; Wedell DH J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1986 Nov; 12(4):496-516. PubMed ID: 2946806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The category effect in social judgment: experimental ratings of happiness. Wedell DH; Parducci A J Pers Soc Psychol; 1988 Sep; 55(3):341-56. PubMed ID: 3171911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Loci of contextual effects in judgment. Mellers BA; Birnbaum MH J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Aug; 8(4):582-601. PubMed ID: 6214609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Two-stimulus--two choice paradigm for psychophysics: range-frequency model and adaptation level theory in comparison]. Sander K; Sarris V Z Exp Psychol; 1997; 44(3):431-46. PubMed ID: 9522678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A similarity-based range-frequency model for two-category rating data. Wedell DH Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Jun; 15(3):638-43. PubMed ID: 18567267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating stimuli from contrasting categories: truncation due to boundaries. Huttenlocher J; Hedges LV; Lourenco SF; Crawford LE; Corrigan B J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):502-19. PubMed ID: 17696696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [What is the origin of the frequency effect in absolute judgment? A contribution to the theory of judgment]. Haubensak G Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1994; 41(3):378-97. PubMed ID: 7801647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Higher order sequential effects in psychophysical judgments. Petzold P; Haubensak G Percept Psychophys; 2001 Aug; 63(6):969-78. PubMed ID: 11578058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Judgment error in category vs magnitude scales. Eyman RK; Kim PJ; Call T Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Apr; 40(2):415-23. PubMed ID: 1178306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Primacy effects in psychophysical judgements]. Haubensak G Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1989; 36(1):42-56. PubMed ID: 2728539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast and assimilation in categorization and exemplar production. Zotov V; Jones MN; Mewhort DJ Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):621-39. PubMed ID: 21264728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of category membership of stimuli on sequential effects in magnitude judgment. Petzold P; Haubensak G Percept Psychophys; 2004 May; 66(4):665-78. PubMed ID: 15311665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modeling judgment of sequentially presented categories using weighting and sampling without replacement. Kusev P; Tsaneva-Atanasova K; van Schaik P; Chater N Behav Res Methods; 2012 Dec; 44(4):1129-34. PubMed ID: 22821378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relative judgment and knowledge of the category structure. Stewart N; Matthews WJ Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Jun; 16(3):594-9. PubMed ID: 19451390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison is not just subtraction: effects of time- and space-order on subjective stimulus difference. Hellström A Percept Psychophys; 2003 Oct; 65(7):1161-77. PubMed ID: 14674641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Category effects on stimulus estimation: shifting and skewed frequency distributions. Duffy S; Huttenlocher J; Hedges LV; Crawford LE Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Apr; 17(2):224-30. PubMed ID: 20382924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Category rating is based on prototypes and not instances: evidence from feedback-dependent context effects. Petrov AA J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Apr; 37(2):336-56. PubMed ID: 21463082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]