These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 294683)
1. Latency determination of the human auditory on- and off- potentials of the brainstem. Influence of stimulus envelope characteristics. Brinkmann RD; Scherg M Scand Audiol Suppl; 1979; (9):189-96. PubMed ID: 294683 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Auditory brainstem responses from human adults and infants: influence of stimulus onset. Folsom RC; Aurich CD Audiology; 1987; 26(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 3606471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Onset-offset effects of the human brainstem auditory-evoked response. Elfner LF; Barnes AR J Aud Res; 1983 Apr; 23(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 6679545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Auditory brain stem responses (ABR) in cat. Latency as a function of stimulus polarity, intensity and acoustic waveform. Tvete O; Haugsten P Scand Audiol Suppl; 1981; 13():35-8. PubMed ID: 6944776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Evaluation of the effect of auditory fatigue on the human ear based on the measurement of brain stem auditory potentials (ABR). II. Relation of temporary auditory threshold shift and changes in the latency of wave V]. Janczewski G; Kochanek K; Dawidowicz J; Dobrzyński P; Checiński P Med Pr; 1988; 39(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 3226285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Brainstem evoked responses specific to low-frequency region. Hoke M; Lütkenhöner B; Bappert E Scand Audiol Suppl; 1979 Mar; 11():105-14. PubMed ID: 299177 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [The influence of click polarity and stimulation rate on the auditory evoked response in relation to age]. Tarantino V; Stura M; Raspino M; Conrad E; Porcu A Pediatr Med Chir; 1989; 11(5):523-7. PubMed ID: 2631058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurements of adaption of brainstem responses. Tietze G; Gobsch H Scand Audiol Suppl; 1979 Mar; 11():91-6. PubMed ID: 299194 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of the position of recording electrode on the amplitude and latency of the auditory brain stem response. Petrek J Acta Univ Palacki Olomuc Fac Med; 1987; 116():97-113. PubMed ID: 2962468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Physiological mechanisms in auditory brainstem-evoked response. Borg E Scand Audiol Suppl; 1981; 13():11-22. PubMed ID: 6944767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Brain stem evoked potentials: comparison of the response to monaural stimulation and the response to binaural stimulation]. Barrasa Benito FJ; Soto Torres J Actas Luso Esp Neurol Psiquiatr Cienc Afines; 1982; 10(3):137-44. PubMed ID: 7148532 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [The auditory evoked potentials of the brain stem in the guinea pig]. Olszewski J Gegenbaurs Morphol Jahrb; 1988; 134(6):941-7. PubMed ID: 3229616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Short-latency evoked magnetic fields from the human auditory brainstem. Erné SN; Hoke M Adv Neurol; 1990; 54():167-76. PubMed ID: 2270802 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Auditory-evoked response in the clinically normal dog: early latency components. Sims MH; Moore RE Am J Vet Res; 1984 Oct; 45(10):2019-27. PubMed ID: 6497099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Auditory evoked potentials from the human cochlea and brainstem. Picton TW; Stapells DR; Campbell KB J Otolaryngol Suppl; 1981 Aug; 9():1-41. PubMed ID: 7026799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of stimulus polarity on far-field auditory-evoked electrical responses in the chick. Brown-Borg HM; Beck MM; Jones TA J Aud Res; 1986 Oct; 26(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 3436924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]