BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29468734)

  • 1. In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with rotational atherectomy radial access is safer and as efficient as femoral access.
    Kübler P; Zimoch W; Kosowski M; Tomasiewicz B; Telichowski A; Reczuch K
    J Interv Cardiol; 2018 Aug; 31(4):471-477. PubMed ID: 29468734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radial Versus Femoral Access for Rotational Atherectomy: A UK Observational Study of 8622 Patients.
    Watt J; Austin D; Mackay D; Nolan J; Oldroyd KG
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 29246910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transradial Versus Transfemoral Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Bajaj A; Pancholy S; Sothwal A; Nawaz Y; Boruah P
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Sep; 20(9):790-798. PubMed ID: 30442537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safety and efficacy of radial versus femoral access for rotational Atherectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Khan AA; Panchal HB; Zaidi SIM; Papireddy MR; Mukherjee D; Cohen MG; Banerjee S; Rao SV; Pancholy S; Paul TK
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Mar; 20(3):241-247. PubMed ID: 30030065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transradial versus trans-femoral access site in high-speed rotational atherectomy in Sweden.
    Desta L; Jurga J; Völz S; Omerovic E; Ulvenstam A; Zwackman S; Pagonis C; Calle F; Olivecrona GK; Persson J; Venetsanos D
    Int J Cardiol; 2022 Apr; 352():45-51. PubMed ID: 35074496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Full conversion from transfemoral to transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions results in a similar success rate and a rapid reduction of in-hospital cardiac and vascular major events.
    Dangoisse V; Guédès A; Gabriel L; Jamart J; Chenu P; Marchandise B; Schroeder E
    EuroIntervention; 2013 Jul; 9(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 23872649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Transradial Approach of Cardiac Catheterization for Patients on Dialysis.
    Kuno T; Hirano K; Imaeda S; Hashimoto K; Ryuzaki T; Saito T; Yamazaki H; Tabei R; Kodaira M; Numasawa Y
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Jun; 30(6):212-217. PubMed ID: 29335385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rotational atherectomy for left main coronary artery disease in octogenarians: transradial approach in a tertiary center and literature review.
    Dahdouh Z; Roule V; Dugué AE; Sabatier R; Lognoné T; Grollier G
    J Interv Cardiol; 2013 Apr; 26(2):173-82. PubMed ID: 23557587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radial Versus Femoral Approach for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: MACE Outcomes at Long-Term Follow-up.
    Campelo-Parada F; Carrié D; Bartorelli AL; Namiki A; Hovasse T; Kimura T; Serra-Peñaranda A; Varenne O; Lalmand J; Kadota K; Ikari Y; Tobaru T; Fujii K; Nakamura S; Saito S; Wijns W;
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Jul; 30(7):262-268. PubMed ID: 29958176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Operator learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary interventions: implications for the initiation of a transradial access program in contemporary US practice.
    Barbash IM; Minha S; Gallino R; Lager R; Badr S; Loh JP; Kitabata H; Pendyala LK; Torguson R; Satler LF; Pichard AD; Waksman R
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Jun; 15(4):195-9. PubMed ID: 24746598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Rise of Transradial Artery Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes in Australia.
    Ocsan RJ; Doost A; Marley P; Farshid A
    J Interv Cardiol; 2020; 2020():4397697. PubMed ID: 33312077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Left main percutaneous coronary intervention-Radial versus femoral access: A systematic analysis.
    Goel S; Pasam RT; Raheja H; Gotesman J; Gidwani U; Ahuja KR; Reed G; Puri R; Khatri JK; Kapadia SR
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jun; 95(7):E201-E213. PubMed ID: 31430040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of arterial access site selection on outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: are the results of randomized trials achievable in clinical practice?
    Mamas MA; Ratib K; Routledge H; Neyses L; Fraser DG; de Belder M; Ludman PF; Nolan J;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 6(7):698-706. PubMed ID: 23769648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of Access Site Practice on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Following Thrombolysis for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United Kingdom: An Insight From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Dataset.
    Rashid M; Rushton CA; Kwok CS; Kinnaird T; Kontopantelis E; Olier I; Ludman P; De Belder MA; Nolan J; Mamas MA
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov; 10(22):2258-2265. PubMed ID: 29169494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radial versus femoral approach for high-speed rotational atherectomy.
    Watt J; Oldroyd KG
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Oct; 74(4):550-4. PubMed ID: 19434605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative Efficacy of Transradial Versus Transfemoral Approach for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Schussler JM; Vasudevan A; von Bose LJ; Won JI; McCullough PA
    Am J Cardiol; 2016 Aug; 118(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 27378143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approach in treatment of chronic total occlusions with similar lesion characteristics.
    Huyut MA; Yamaç AH
    Anatol J Cardiol; 2018 May; 19(5):319-325. PubMed ID: 29724974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transradial access in a cath lab with moderate procedural volume: a single operator's experience.
    Rigattieri S; Ferraiuolo G; Loschiavo P
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2007 Jun; 55(3):303-9. PubMed ID: 17534248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of Sex on Comparative Outcomes of Radial Versus Femoral Access in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Invasive Management: Data From the Randomized MATRIX-Access Trial.
    Gargiulo G; Ariotti S; Vranckx P; Leonardi S; Frigoli E; Ciociano N; Tumscitz C; Tomassini F; Calabrò P; Garducci S; Crimi G; Andò G; Ferrario M; Limbruno U; Cortese B; Sganzerla P; Lupi A; Russo F; Garbo R; Ausiello A; Zavalloni D; Sardella G; Esposito G; Santarelli A; Tresoldi S; Nazzaro MS; Zingarelli A; Petronio AS; Windecker S; da Costa BR; Valgimigli M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jan; 11(1):36-50. PubMed ID: 29301646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transfemoral approach with systematic use of FemoSeal™ closure device compared to transradial approach in primary angioplasty.
    Alonzo A; Rigattieri S; Giovannelli F; Di Russo C; Sciahbasi A; Berni A; Volpe M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):849-54. PubMed ID: 26104978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.